Interactive CT Diagnostics, Planning and Preparation for Dental Implants

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 19-25

  Kraut, Richard A ^a,b  

^a MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone density; Bone volume; Implant placement; Interactive radiography; Reformatted computerization

Indexed keywords

BONE DENSITY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; JAW; METHODOLOGY; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; RADIOGRAPHY; REVIEW; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

BONE DENSITY; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; HUMANS; JAW; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0031617299     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00008505-199804000-00002     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Abrahams JJ, Arjun K. Dental implants and dental CT software programs. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI. 1995;16:468-486.
2. Mariano JE, Arenal AA, Ceballos AP, Vazquez JPF, Diaz GI. Fabrication of an implant radiologic-surgical stent for the partially edentulous patient. Quintessence Int. 1995;26:111-114.
3. Block MS, Kent JN. Endosseous Implants for Maxillofacial Reconstruction. W.B. Saunders Company, 1995.
4. Tan KBC. The use of multiplanar reformatted computerized tomography in the surgical-prosthodontic planning of implant placement. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1995;24:68-75.
5. Kraut RA. Utilization of 3D/Dental software for precise implant site selection: Clinical reports. Implant Dent. 1992;1: 134-139.
6. Kraut RA. Effective uses of radiographs for implant placements - panographs, cephalograms, CT scans (interview). Dent Implantol Update. 1993;4:29-33.
7. Lima-Verde MAR, Morgano M. A dual-purpose stent for the implant-supported prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent. 1993; 69:276-280.
8. Kraut RA. Interactive radiologic diagnosis and case planning for implants. Dent Implantol Update. 1994;5:49-55.
9. Basten CHJ. The use of radiopaque templates for predictable implant placement. Quintessence Int. 1995; 26:609-612.
10. Borrow JW, Smith JP. Stent marker materials for computer tomograph - assisted implant planning. Int J Periodont Rest Dent. 1996;16:61-67.
11. Lam EWN, Rupecht A, Yang J. Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computer tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;74:42-46.
12. Kraut RA. Radiologic planning for dental implants. Endosseous Implants for Maxillofacial Reconstruction, W. B. Saunders, 1995;113-133.
13. Dharmar S. Locating the mandibular canal in panoramic radiographs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997;12:113-117.
14. Todd AD, Gher ME, Quintero G, Richardson AC. Interpretation of linear and computer tomograms in the assessment of implant recipient sites. J Periodontol. 1993;64:1243-1249.
15. Abrahmas JJ. The role of diagnostic imaging in dental implantology. Radiol Clin North Am. 1993;31:163-180.
16. Verstreken K, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Marchal G, Naert I, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D. Computer-assisted planning of oral implant surgery: A three-dimensional approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11:806-810.
17. Stellino G, Morgano SM, and Imbelloni A. A dual-purpose, implant stent made from a provisional fixed partial denture. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;74:212-214.
18. Klein M, Cranin AN, Sirakian A. A computerized tomography (CT) scan appliance for optimal presurgical and preprosthetic planning of the implant patient. PP&A. 1993; 33-39.
19. Fredholm U, Bolin A, Andersson L. Preimplant radiographic assessment of available maxillary bone support. Comparison of tomographic and panoramic technique. Swed Dent J. 1993;17:103-109.
20. Duckmanton NA, Austin BW, Lechner SK, Klineberg IJ. Imaging for predictable maxillary implants. Int J Prosthodont. 1994;7:77-80.
21. Scher ELC. Use of the incisive canal as a recipient site for root form implants: Preliminary clinical reports. Implant Dent. 1994;3:38-41.
22. Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone. J Periodont. 1991;62:2-4.
23. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Branemark PI, Jemt T. A long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990; 5:347-359.
24. Kohavi D, Bar-Ziv J. Atypical incisive nerve: Clinical report. Implant Dent. 1996;5:281-283.
25. Balshi TJ, Ekfeldt A, Stenberg T, Vrielinck L. Three-year evaluation of Branemark implants connected to angulated abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997;12:52-58.
26. Higginbottom FL, Wilson TG. Three-dimensional templates for placement of root form dental implants: A technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11:787-793.
27. Reddy MS, Mayfield-Donahoo T, Vanderven FJJ, Jeffcoat MK. A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computer tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1994;5:229-238.
28. Weinberg LA: CT scan as a radiologic data base for optimum implant orientation. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69:381-385.