Cone beam computed tomography-assisted treatment planning concepts

Dental Clinics of North America

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 515-536

  Ganz, Scott D ^a,b  

^a RUTGERS SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Private Practice   (United States)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Cone beam computed tomography; Dental implants; Interactive treatment planning applications

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; CASE REPORT; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DECISION MAKING; DENTAL TECHNOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ANATOMY, CROSS-SECTIONAL; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DECISION MAKING; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RISK ASSESSMENT; TECHNOLOGY, DENTAL; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 79959900163     PISSN: 00118532     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2011.02.019     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Angelopoulos C., Aghaloo T. Imaging technology in implant diagnosis. Dent Clin North Am 2011, 55(1):141-158.
2. Berco M., Rigali P.H., Miner R.M., et al. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009, 136(1):17.e1-17.e9. [discussion 17-8].
3. Chan H.L., Misch K., Wang H.L. Dental imaging in implant treatment planning. Implant Dent 2010, 19(4):288-298.
4. Dreiseidler T., Mischkowski R.A., Neugebauer J., et al. Comparison of cone-beam imaging with orthopantomography and computerized tomography for assessment in presurgical implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009, 24(2):216-225.
5. Froum S., Casanova L., Byrne S., et al. Risk assessment before extraction for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a computerized tomographic scan study. J Periodontol 2011, 82(3):395-402.
6. Ganz S.D. CT scan technology-an evolving tool for predictable implant placement and restoration. International Magazine of Oral Implantology 2001, 1:6-13.
7. Ganz S.D. The triangle of bone-a formula for successful implant placement and restoration. Implant Soc 1995, 5(5):2-6.
8. Ganz S.D. Mandibular tori as a source for on-lay bone graft augmentation: a surgical procedure. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1997, 9(9):973-982. The Implant Report.
9. Ganz S.D. Use of stereolithographic models as diagnostic and restorative aids for predictable immediate loading of implants. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2003, 15(10):763-771.
10. Ganz S.D. Presurgical planning with CT-derived fabrication of surgical guides. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005, 63(9 Suppl 2):59-71.
11. Ganz S.D. The reality of anatomy and the triangle of bone. Inside Dent 2006, 2(5):72-77.
12. Ganz S.D. Techniques for the use of CT imaging for the fabrication of surgical guides. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2006, 14:75-97.
13. Ganz S.D. Using interactive technology: " in the zone with the triangle of bone." Dent Implantol Update 2008, 19(5):33-38. [quiz: p1].
14. Ganz S.D. Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing applications using CT and cone beam CT scan technology. Dent Clin North Am 2008, 52(4):777-808.
15. Ganz S.D. Restoratively driven implant dentistry utilizing advanced software and CBCT: realistic abutments and virtual teeth. Dent Today 2008, 27(7):122. 124, 126-7.
16. Ganz S.D. Advanced case planning with SimPlant. The art of computer-guided implantology 2009, 193-210. Quintessence, Chicago. P. Tardieu, A. Rosenfeld (Eds.).
17. Ganz SD. Case Report: CBCT-assisted treatment of the failing long span bridge with staged and immediate load implant restoration. DentalTown 2010, 11(11):82-86.
18. Ganz S.D. The use of CT/CBCT and interactive virtual treatment planning and the triangle of bone: defining new paradigms for assessment of implant receptor sites. Dental implants-the art and science 2010, 146-166. Saunders, Maryland Heights (MO). C. Babbush, J. Hahn, J. Krauser (Eds.).
19. Ganz S.D. Implant complications associated with two- and three dimensional diagnostic imaging technologies. Dental implant complications-etiology, prevention, and treatment 2010, 71-99. Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex (UK). S.J. Froum (Ed.).
20. Greenstein G., Tarnow D. The mental foramen and nerve: clinical and anatomical factors related to dental implant placement: a literature review. J Periodontol 2006, 77(12):1933-1943.
21. Guerrero M.E., Jacobs R., Loubele M., et al. State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement. Clin Oral Investig 2006, 10(1):1-7.
22. Hassan B., Couto Souza P., Jacobs R., et al. Influence of scanning and reconstruction parameters on quality of three-dimensional surface models of the dental arches from cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig 2010, 14(3):303-310.
23. Hassan B., van derStelt P., Sanderink G. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis: influence of patient scanning position. Eur J Orthod 2009, 31(2):129-134.
24. Hatcher D.C., Dial C., Mayorga C. Cone beam CT for pre-surgical assessment of implant sites. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003, 31(11):825-833.
25. Howard-Swirzinski K., Edwards P.C., Saini T.S., et al. Length and geometric patterns of the greater palatine canal observed in cone beam computed tomography. Int J Dent 2010, Article ID: 292753.
26. Lau S.L., Chow J., Li W., et al. Classification of maxillary central incisors-implications for immediate implant in the esthetic zone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011, 69(1):142-153.
27. Ludlow J.B., Laster W.S., See M., et al. Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy in cone beam computed tomography images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007, 103(4):534-542.
28. Mandelaris G.A., Rosenfeld A.L. The expanding influence of computed tomography and the application of computer-guided implantology. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2008, 20(5):297-305. [quiz: 306].
29. Mol A., Balasundaram A. In vitro cone beam computed tomography imaging of periodontal bone. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008, 37(6):319-324.
30. Moreira C.R., Sales M.A., Lopes P.M., et al. Assessment of linear and angular measurements on three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographic images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009, 108(3):430-436.
31. Mraiwa N., Jacobs R., van Steenberghe D., et al. Clinical assessment and surgical implications of anatomic challenges in the anterior mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003, 5(4):219-225.
32. Naitoh M., Nabeshima H., Hayashi H., et al. Postoperative assessment of incisor dental implants using cone-beam computed tomography. J Oral Implantol 2010, 36(5):377-384.
33. Nevins M., Nevins M.L., Camelo M., et al. Human histologic evidence of a connective tissue attachment to a dental implant. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008, 28(2):111-121.
34. Nevins M., Kim D.M., Jun S.H., et al. Histologic evidence of a connective tissue attachment to laser microgrooved abutments: a canine study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010, 30(3):245-255.
35. Orentlicher G., Goldsmith D., Horowitz A. Applications of 3-dimensional virtual computerized tomography technology in oral and maxillofacial surgery: current therapy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010, 68(8):1933-1959.
36. Ozan O., Turkyilmaz I., Ersoy A.E., et al. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009, 67(2):394-401.
37. Pecora G.E., Ceccarelli R., Bonelli M., et al. Clinical evaluation of laser microtexturing for soft tissue and bone attachment to dental implants. Implant Dent 2009, 18(1):57-66.
38. Razavi T., Palmer R.M., Davies J., et al. Accuracy of measuring the cortical bone thickness adjacent to dental implants using cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010, 21(7):718-725.
39. Rosenfeld A., Mandelaris G., Tardieu P. Prosthetically directed placement using computer software to insure precise placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part 1: diagnostics, imaging, and collaborative accountability. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006, 26:215-221.
40. Rosenfeld A.L., Mandelaris G.A., Tardieu P.B. Prosthetically directed implant placement using computer software to ensure precise placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part 2: rapid-prototype medical modeling and stereolithographic drilling guides requiring bone exposure. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006, 26(4):347-353.
41. Rosenfeld A.L., Mandelaris G.A., Tardieu P.B. Prosthetically directed implant placement using computer software to ensure precise placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part 3: stereolithographic drilling guides that do not require bone exposure and the immediate delivery of teeth. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006, 26(5):493-499.
42. Rothman, Stephen L.G. Computerized tomography of the enhanced alveolar ridge. Dental applications of computerized tomography 1998, 87-112. Quintessence Publishing, Chicago. C. Anderson-Wiedenbeck (Ed.).
43. Sarment D.P., Shammari K., Kazor C.E. Stereolithographic surgical templates for placement of dental implants in complex cases. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003, 23:287-295.
44. Schulze R.K., Berndt D., d'Hoedt B. On cone-beam computed tomography artifacts induced by titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010, 21(1):100-107.
45. Shapoff C.A., Lahey B., Wasserlauf P.A., et al. Radiographic analysis of crestal bone levels around Laser-Lok collar dental implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010, 30(2):129-137.
46. tenBruggenkate C.M., Krekeler G., Kraaijenhagen H.A., et al. Hemorrhage of the floor of the mouth resulting from lingual perforation during implant placement: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993, 8(3):329-334.
47. Thomas S.L., Angelopoulos C. Contemporary dental and maxillofacial imaging. Dent Clin North Am 2008, 52(4).
48. Uchida Y., Noguchi N., Goto M., et al. Measurement of anterior loop length for the mandibular canal and diameter of the mandibular incisive canal to avoid nerve damage when installing endosseous implants in the interforaminal region: a second attempt introducing cone beam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009, 67(4):744-750.
49. Valente F., Schiroli G., Sbrenna A. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009, 24(2):234-242.
50. Weiner S., Simon J., Ehrenberg D.S., et al. The effects of laser microtextured collars upon crestal bone levels of dental implants. Implant Dent 2008, 17(2):217-228.
51. Worthington P., Rubenstein J., Hatcher D.C. The role of cone-beam computed tomography in the planning and placement of implants. J Am Dent Assoc 2010, 141(Suppl 3):19S-24S.