Comparison of linear tomography and direct ridge mapping for the determination of edentulous ridge dimensions in human cadavers

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology

Volumn 99, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 748-754

  Perez, Luis A ^a   Brooks, Sharon L ^b   Wang, Hom Lay ^c   Eber, Robert M ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN FLINT   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALVEOLAR BONE; ARTICLE; CADAVER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DRILL; EDENTULOUSNESS; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JAW RADIOGRAPHY; MANDIBLE; OSTEOMETRY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STENT; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ALVEOLAR PROCESS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CADAVER; CEPHALOMETRY; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MANDIBLE; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STENTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY;

EID: 19344369451     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.10.023     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. L.T. Kircos, and C.E. Misch Diagnostic imaging and techniques C.E. Misch Contemporary implant dentistry 1999 Mosby St Louis 73 87
2. D.J. Wilson Ridge mapping for determination of alveolar ridge width Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 4 1989 41 43
3. K. Dula, R. Mini, P.F. van der Stelt, and D. Buser The radiographic assessment of implant patients: decision-making criteria Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 16 2001 80 89
4. M. Traxler, C. Ulm, P. Solar, and W. Lill Sonographic measurement versus mapping for determination of residual ridge width J Prosthet Dent 67 1992 358 361
5. C.M. ten Bruggenkate, T.B. de Rijcke, H.A. Kraaijenhagen, and H.S. Oosterbeek Ridge mapping Implant Dent 3 1994 179 182
6. W. Sumnig [Determining the alveolar ridge width in planning treatment with endosseous implants] Stomatol DDR 40 1990 120 121 German
7. F. Allen, and D.G. Smith An assessment of the accuracy of ridge-mapping in planning implant therapy for the anterior maxilla Clin Oral Implants Res 11 2000 34 38
8. Y.H. Ismail, M. Azarbal, and S.F. Kapa Conventional linear tomography: protocol for assessing endosseous implant sites J Prosthet Dent 73 1995 153 157
9. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Tomography The New Encyclopaedia Britannica 11 1998 Encyclopaedia Britannica Chicago 837
10. K.J. Butterfield, M. Dagenais, and C. Clokie Linear tomography's clinical accuracy and validity for presurgical dental implant analysis Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 84 1997 203 209
11. A. Bolin, S. Eliasson, M. von Beetzen, and L. Jansson Radiographic evaluation of mandibular posterior implant sites: correlation between panoramic and tomographic determinations Clin Oral Implants Res 7 1996 354 359
12. L. Schropp, A. Wenzel, and L. Kostopoulos Impact of conventional tomography on prediction of the appropriate implant size Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 92 2001 458 463
13. T.L. Mayfield-Donahoo, E.M. Stokely, and M.K. Jeffcoat Blur reduction of conventional film-based tomograms for pre-surgical evaluation of potential mandibular implant sites J Periodontol 68 1997 362 368
14. D.M. Almog, and R. Sanchez Correlation between planned prosthetic and residual bone trajectories in dental implants J Prosthet Dent 81 1999 562 567
15. A.D. Todd, M.E. Gher, G. Quintero, and A.C. Richardson Interpretation of linear and computed tomograms in the assessment of implant recipient sites J Periodontol 64 1993 1243 1249
16. J.G. Zosky In-office linear tomography: a new technology for definitive preplanning of endosteal implant sites Int J Dent Symp 3 1995 26 29
17. D.K. Kassebaum, P.V. Nummikoski, R.G. Triplett, and R.P. Langlais Cross-sectional radiography for implant site assessment Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 70 1990 674 678
18. B. Klinge, A. Petersson, and P. Maly Location of the mandibular canal: comparison of macroscopic findings, conventional radiography, and computed tomography Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 4 1989 327 332