Imaging Technology in Implant Diagnosis

Dental Clinics of North America

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 141-158

  Angelopoulos, Christos ^a   Aghaloo, Tara ^b  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b UCLA SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Cone beam; Dental implant; Radiography

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; JAW; METHODOLOGY; ORAL SURGERY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; RADIOGRAPHY; REVIEW; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; JAW; ORAL SURGICAL PROCEDURES, PREPROSTHETIC; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL;

EID: 78649393190     PISSN: 00118532     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2010.08.001     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. White S.C., Pharoah M.J. Oral radiology: principles and interpretation 2009, Mosby, St Louis (MO), p. 597. 6th edition.
2. Reiskin A.B. Implant imaging: status, controversies and new developments. Dent Clin North Am 1998, 42(1):47-56.
3. Misch C.E. Contemporary implant dentistry 1999, Mosby, St Louis (MO). 2nd edition.
4. Goaz P.W., White S.C. Oral radiology: principles and interpretation 1994, Mosby, St. Louis (MO). 3rd edition.
5. Bean L.R. Comparison of bisecting angle and paralleling methods of intraoral radiology. J Dent Educ 1969, 33(4):441-445.
6. Manson-Hing L.R. On the evaluation of radiographic techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1969, 27(5):631-634.
7. Wuehrmann A.H. The long cone technique. Pract Dent Monogr 1957, 1-30.
8. Miles D.A., Van Dis M.L. Implant radiology. Dent Clin North Am 1993, 37(4):645-668.
9. Brooks R.A. Medical physics of CT and ultrasound: tissue imaging and characterization. Medical physics monograph no 6 1980, American Institute of Physics, New York.
10. Som P.M., Curtin H.D. Head and neck imaging. 3rd edition 1996, vol. 1. Mosby, St Louis (MO).
11. Scarfe W.C., Farman A.G., Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 2006, 72(1):75-80.
12. Lascala C.A., Panella J., Marques M.M. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004, 33(5):291-294.
13. Hashimoto K., Kawashima S., Araki M., et al. Comparison of image performance between cone-beam computed tomography for dental use and four-row multidetector helical CT. J Oral Sci 2006, 48(1):27-34.
14. Hashimoto K., Kawashima S., Kameoka S., et al. Comparison of image validity between cone beam computed tomography for dental use and multidetector row helical computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007, 36(8):465-471.
15. Tyndall D.A., Brooks S.L. Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the american academy of oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000, 89(5):630-637.
16. Stella J.P., Tharanon W. A precise radiographic method to determine the location of the inferior alveolar canal in the posterior edentulous mandible: implications for dental implants. part 1: technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990, 5(1):15-22.
17. Angelopoulos C., Thomas S.L., Hechler S., et al. Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008, 66(10):2130-2135.
18. Norton M.R., Gamble C. Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001, 12(1):79-84.
19. Hatcher D.C., Dial C., Mayorga C. Cone beam CT for pre-surgical assessment of implant sites. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003, 31(11):825-833.
20. Ganz S.D. Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing applications using CT and cone beam CT scanning technology. Dent Clin North Am 2008, 52(4):777-808. vii.
21. Ganz S.D. Presurgical planning with CT-derived fabrication of surgical guides. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005, 63(9 Suppl 2):59-71.
22. Bedrossian E. Laboratory and prosthetic considerations in computer-guided surgery and immediate loading. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007, 65(Suppl 1):47-52.
23. Roos J., Sennerby L., Lekholm U., et al. A qualitative and quantitative method for evaluating implant success: a 5-year retrospective analysis of the Brånemark implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997, 12(4):504-514.
24. Schwartz-Arad D., Herzberg R., Levin L. Evaluation of long-term implant success. J Periodontol 2005, 76(10):1623-1628.