Evaluation of maxillary sinus anatomy by cone-beam CT prior to sinus floor elevation

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 258-265

  Neugebauer, Joerg ^a   Ritter, Lutz ^a   Mischkowski, Robert A ^a   Dreiseidler, Timo ^a   Scherer, Philipp ^a   Ketterle, Matthias ^a   Rothamel, Daniel ^a   Zöller, Joachim E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Antral septa; Cone beam computed tomography; Dental implants; Dental radiography; Sinus floor elevation; Sinus membrane

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CANINE TOOTH; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; MAXILLA; MAXILLARY SINUS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR TOOTH; ORAL SURGERY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEX DIFFERENCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH ARCH;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALVEOLAR RIDGE AUGMENTATION; BICUSPID; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CUSPID; DENTAL ARCH; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MAXILLA; MAXILLARY SINUS; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR; MOLAR, THIRD; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEX FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77953263461     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Tan WC, Lang NP, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. Part II: Transalveolar technique. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:241-254.
2. Del Fabbro M, Rosano G, Taschieri S. Implant survival rates after maxillary sinus augmentation. Eur J Oral Sci 2008;116:497-506.
3. Lawson W, Patel ZM, Lin FY. The development and pathologic processes that influence maxillary sinus pneumatization. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2008;291:1554-1563.
4. Sharan A, Madjar D. Maxillary sinus pneumatization following extractions: A radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:48-56.
5. Farhat FF, Kinaia B, Gross HB. Sinus bone augmentation: A review of the common techniques. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2008;29:388-392,394-387.
6. Garg AK. Augmentation grafting of the maxillary sinus for placement of dental implants: Anatomy, physiology, and procedures. Implant Dent 1999;8:36-46.
7. Smiler DG. The sinus lift graft: Vasic technique and variations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1997;9:885-893.
8. Tatum OH Jr, Lebowitz MS, Tatum CA, Borgner RA. Sinus augmentation. Rationale, development, long-term results. N Y State Dent J 1993;59:43-48.
9. Jensen OT, Shulman LB, Block MS, Iacono VJ. Report of the Sinus Consensus Conference of 1996. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13(suppl):11-45.
10. Ulm CW, Solar P, Krennmair G, Matejka M, Watzek G. Incidence and suggested surgical management of septa in sinus-lift procedures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:462-465.
11. Krennmair G, Ulm C, Lugmayr H. Maxillary sinus septa: Incidence, morphology and clinical implications. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1997;25:261-265.
12. Zijderveld SA, van den Bergh JP, Schulten EA, ten Bruggenkate CM. Anatomical and surgical findings and complications in 100 consecutive maxillary sinus floor elevation procedures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66:1426-1438.
13. Betts NJ, Miloro M. Modification of the sinus lift procedure for septa in the maxillary antrum. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;52:332-333.
14. Katranji A, Fotek P, Wang HL. Sinus augmentation complications:Etiology and treatment. Implant Dent 2008;17:339-349.
15. Underwood AS. An inquiry into the anatomy and pathology of the maxillary sinus. J Anat Physiol 1910;44:354-369.
16. Lugmayr H, Krennmair G, Holzer H. Morphologie und Inzidenz von Kieferhohlensepten [The morphology and incidence of maxillary sinus septa]. Rofo 1996;165:452-454.
17. Krennmair G, Ulm CW, Lugmayr H, Solar P. The incidence, location, and height of maxillary sinus septa in the edentulous and dentate maxilla. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;57:667-671.
18. Velasquez-Plata D, Hovey LR, Peach CC, Alder ME. Maxillary sinus septa: A 3-dimensional computerized tomographic scan analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:854-860.
19. Shibli JA, Faveri M, Ferrari DS, et al. Prevalence of maxillary sinus septa in 1024 subjects with edentulous upper jaws: A retrospective study. J Oral Implantol 2007;33:293-296.
20. Selcuk A, Ozcan KM, Akdogan O, Bilal N, Dere H. Variations of maxillary sinus and accompanying anatomical and pathological structures. J Craniofac Surg 2008;19:159-164.
21. Kasabah S, Slezak R, Simunek A, Krug J, Lecaro MC. Evaluation of the accuracy of panoramic radiograph in the definition of maxillary sinus septa. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove) 2002;45:173-175.
22. Jensen OT, Greer R. Immediate placement of osseointegrating implants into the maxillary sinus augmented with mineralized cancellous allograft and Gore-Tex: Second-stage surgical and histologic findings. In: Laney WR, Tolman DE (eds). Tissue Integration in Oral Orthopedic and Maxillofacial Reconstruction. Chicago: Quintessence, 1992:321-333.
23. Kim MJ, Jung UW, Kim CS, et al. Maxillary sinus septa: Prevalence, height, location, and morphology. A reformatted computed tomography scan analysis. J Periodontol 2006;77:903-908.
24. Gonzalez-Santana H, Penarrocha-Diago M, Guarinos-Carbo J, Sorni-Broker M. A study of the septa in the maxillary sinuses and the subantral alveolar processes in 30 patients. J Oral Implantol 2007;33:340-343.
25. Ella B, Noble Rda C, Lauverjat Y, et al. Septa within the sinus:Effect on elevation of the sinus floor. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;46:464-467.
26. Sukovic P. Cone-beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res 2003;6(suppl 1):31-36.
27. Tischler M. In-office cone beam computerized tomography:Technology review and clinical examples. Dent Today 2008; 27:102,104,106.
28. Mischkowski RA, Ritter L, Neugebauer J, Dreiseidler T, Keeve E, Zoller JE. Diagnostic quality of panoramic views obtained by a newly developed digital volume tomography device for maxillofacial imaging. Quintessence Int 2007;38:763-772.
29. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:106-114.
30. Mischkowski RA, Pulsfort R, Ritter L, et al. Geometric accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam device for maxillofacial imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104:551-559.
31. Mischkowski RA, Scherer P, Ritter L, Neugebauer J, Keeve E, Zoller JE. Diagnostic quality of multiplanar reformations obtained with a newly developed cone beam device for maxillofacial imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:1-9.
32. Wood RM, Moore DL. Grafting of the maxillary sinus with intraorally harvested autogenous bone prior to implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:209-214.
33. Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980;38:613-616.
34. Tatum H Jr. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am 1986;30:207-229.
35. Renouard F, Nisand D. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17(suppl 2):35-51.
36. Raghoebar GM, Timmenga NM, Reintsema H, Stegenga B, Vissink A. Maxillary bone grafting for insertion of endosseous implants: Results after 12-124 months. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:279-286.
37. Raghoebar GM, Batenburg RH, Timmenga NM, Vissink A, Reint - sema H. Morbidity and complications of bone grafting of the floor of the maxillary sinus for the placement of endos seous implants. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 1999;3(suppl 1):S65-S69.
38. Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Rimondini L. Dental implants placed in grafted maxillary sinuses: A retrospective analysis of clinical outcome according to the initial clinical situation and a proposal of defect classification. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:416-428.
39. Neukam FW, Flemmig TF. Local and systemic conditions potentially compromising osseointegration. Consensus report of working group 3. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17(suppl 2):160-162.
40. Hernandez-Alfaro F, Torradeflot MM, Marti C. Prevalence and management of Schneiderian membrane perforations during sinus-lift procedures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:91-98.
41. Zimbler MS, Lebowitz RA, Glickman R, Brecht LE, Jacobs JB. Antral augmentation, osseointegration, and sinusitis: The otolaryngologist’s perspective. Am J Rhinol 1998;12:311-316.
42. Potter BJ, Shrout MK, Russell CM, Sharawy M. Implant site assessment using panoramic cross-sectional tomographic imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;84:436-442.
43. Sharan A, Madjar D. Correlation between maxillary sinus floor topography and related root position of posterior teeth using panoramic and cross-sectional computed tomography imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;102:375-381.
44. Perez CA, Farman AG. Diagnostic radiology of maxillary sinus defects. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1988;66:507-512.
45. Hirsch E, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Silva MA. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:268-273.
46. Anavi Y, Allon DM, Avishai G, Calderon S. Complications of maxillary sinus augmentations in a selective series of patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:34-38.