The use of 3 different imaging methods for the localization of the mandibular canal in dental implant planning

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 463-470

  Peker, Ilkay ^a   Alkurt, Meryem Toraman ^a   Mihcioglu, Tansev ^a  

^a GAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Dental implant; Imaging methods; Mandibular canal; Treatment planning

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CADAVER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MANDIBULAR NERVE; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TOMOGRAPHY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; CADAVER; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; HUMANS; MANDIBULAR NERVE; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 47249108969     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Wyatt CC, Pharoah MJ. Imaging techniques and image interpretation for dental implant treatment. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:442-452.
2. Iplikcioglu H, Akca K, Cehrell MC.The use of computerized tomography for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry. J Oral lmplantol 2002;28:29-36.
3. Engelman MJ, Sorensen JA, Moy P.Optimum placement of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:467-473.
4. Scaf G, Lurie AG, Mosier KM, Kantor ML, Ramsby GR, Freedman ML. Dosimetry and cost of imaging osseointegrated implants with film-based and computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;83:41-48.
5. Stella JP,Tharanon W. A precise radiographic method to determine the location of the inferior alveolar canal in the posterior edentulous mandible: Implications for dental implants, Part 1: Technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:15-22.
6. Frederiksen NL, Benson BW, Sokolowski TW. Effective dose and risk assessment from film tomography used for dental implant diagnostics. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994;23:123-127.
7. Reiskin AB. Implant imaging status, controversies and new developments. Dent Clin North Am 1998;42:47-56.
8. Sunden S, Grondahl K, Grondahl HG. Accuracy and precision in the radiographic diagnosis of clinical instability in Brånemark dental implants.Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:220-226.
9. Todd A, Gher M, Quintero G, Richardson A. Interpretation of linear and computed tomograms in the assessment of implant recipient sites. J Periodontol 1993 63; 1243-1249.
10. Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L. Impact of conventional tomography on the prediction of the appropriate implant size.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001; 92:458-463.
11. Bolin A, Eliasson S, von Beetzen M, Jansson L Radiographic evaluation of mandibular posterior implant sites: Correlation between panoramic and tomographic determinations. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:354-359.
12. Akdeniz BG, Oksan T, Kovanlikaya I, Gene I, Evaluation of bone height and bone density by computed tomography and panoramic radiography for implant recipient sites. J Oral lmplantol 2000;26:114-119.
13. Lindh C, Petersson A, Klinge B. Visualization of the mandibular canal by different radiographic techniques.Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:90-97.
14. Bou Serhal C, van Steenberghe D, Bosmans H, Sanderink GC, Quirynen M, Jacobs R. Organ radiation dose assessment for conventional spiral tomography: A human cadaver study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:85-90.
15. Preda L, Di Maggio EM, Dore R, et al. Use of spiral computed tomography for multiplanar dental reconstruction. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997;26:327-331.
16. Serhal CB,van Steenberghe D,Quirynen M,Jacobs R. Localisation of the mandibular canal using conventional spiral tomography: A human cadaver study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12:230-236.
17. Yang J,Cavalcanti MG, Ruprecht A, Vannier MW.2-D and 3-D reconstructions of spiral computed tomography in localisation of the inferior alveolar canal for dental implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;87: 369-374.
18. ten Bruggenkate CM, Krekeler G, Kraaijenhagen HA, Foitzik C, Nat P, Oosterbeek HS. Hemorrhage of the floor of the mouth resulting from lingual perforation during implant placement: A clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8: 329-334.
19. Naitoh M, Kawamata A, lida H, Ariji E. Cross-sectional imaging of the jaws for dental Implant treatment: Accuracy of linear tomography using a panoramic machine in comparison with reformatted computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:107-112.
20. Hanazawa T, Sano T, Seki K, OkanoT. Radiologic measurements of the mandible: A comparison between CT-reformatted and conventional tomographic images.Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:226-232.
21. Horton RA, Ludlow JB, Webber RL, Gates W, Nason RhJr, Reboussin D. Detection of peri-implant bone changes with axial tomosynthesis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;81:124-129.
22. Batenburg RH, Stelllngsma K, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A. Bone height measurements on panoramic radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;84:430-435.
23. ten Bruggenkate CM, van Der Linden LW, Oosterbeek HS. Parallelism of implants visualized on the orthopantomogram. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989;18:213-215.
24. Klinge B, Petersson A, Maly P. Location of the mandibular canal: A comparison of macroscopic findings, conventional radiography, and computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:327-332.
25. Sonick M, Abrahams J, Faiella RA. A comparison of accuracy of the periapical, panoramic, and computerized tomographic radiographs in locating the mandibular canal. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:455-460.
26. Lindh C, Petersson A, Klinge B. Measurements of distances related to the mandibular canal In radiographs, Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:96-103.
27. Tyndall DA, Brooks SL. Selection criteria for dental implant site Imaging: A position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;89:630-637.
28. Guerrero ME, Jacobs R, Loubele M, Schutyser F, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D. State of the art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement. Clin Oral Invest 2006;10:1-7.
29. Harris D, Buser D, Dula K, et al. E.A.O. Guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry, A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration in Trinity College Dublin. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13;566-570.
30. Peltola JS, Mattila M. Cross-sectional tomograms obtained with four panoramic radiographic units in the assessment of implant measurements. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33: 295-300.
31. Frei C, Buser D, Dula K. Study on the necessity for cross-section imaging of the posterior mandible for treatment planning of standard cases in implant dentistry.Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:490-497.
32. Naitoh M,Katsumata A, Kubota Y,Okumura S, Hayashi H, Ariji E.The role of objective plane angulation on the mandibular image using cross-sectional tomography.J Oral lmplantol 2006;32:117-121.
33. Jacobs R, Mralwa N, van Steenberghe D, Sanderlnk G, Quirynen M. Appearance of mandibular Incisive canal on panoramic radiographs.Surg Radiol Anat 2004;26:329-333.
34. Cavalcanti MG, Rocha SS, Vannier MW.Craniofacial measurements based on 3D-CT volume rendering: Implications for clinical applications. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:170-176.
35. Reddy MS, Mayfield-Donahoo T,Vanderven FJ, Jeffcoat MK. A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5: 229-238.
36. Greenstein G, Tarnow D.The mental foramen and nerve:Clinical and anatomical factors related to dental Implant placement: A literature review. J Periodontol 2006;77:1933-1943.
37. Beslmo C, Lambrecht JT, Guindy JS. Accuracy of Implant treatment planning utilizing template-guided reformatted computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000;29:46-51.
38. Sakakura CE, Loffredo Lde C, Scaf G. Diagnostic agreement of conventional and Inverted scanned panoramic radiographs in the detection of the mandibular canal and the mental foramen.J Oral lmplantol 2004;30:2-6.
39. Potter BJ, Shrout MK, Russell CM, Sharawy M. Implant site assessment using panoramic cross-sectional tomographic imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;84:436-442.
40. Petrikowski CG, Pharoah NJ, Schmitt A. Presurglcal radiographic assessment of implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:59-64.