Erratum (DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.021);Comparison Between Digital Panoramic Radiography and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for the Identification of the Mandibular Canal as Part of Presurgical Dental Implant Assessment

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 66, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 2130-2135

  Angelopoulos, Christos ^a   Thomas, Stephen ^b   Hechler, Stephen ^b   Parissis, Nikos ^c   Hlavacek, Matt ^b  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b Aristotle University ^*

^c ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MANDIBLE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

EID: 51449097789     PISSN: 02782391     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.10.003     Document Type: Erratum

References (15)

1. van der Stelt P.F. Principles of digital imaging. Dent Clin North Am 44 (2000) 237
2. Farman A.G., and Farman T.T. Extraoral and panoramic systems. Dent Clin North Am 44 (2000) 257
3. Angelopoulos C., Bedard A.M., Katz J.O., et al. Digital panoramic radiography: An overview. Semin Orthod 10 (2004) 194
4. Hildebolt C.F., Coutoure R.A., and Whiting B.R. Dental photostimulable phosphor radiography. Dent Clin North Am 44 (2000) 273
5. Parks E.T., and Williamson G.F. Digital radiography: An overview. J Contemp Dent Pract 3 (2002) 23
6. Scarfe W.S., Farman A.G., and Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 72 (2006) 75
7. Sukovic P. Cone beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res 6 Suppl 1 (2003) 31
8. Ziegler C.M., Woertche R., Brief J., et al. Clinical indications for digital volume tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 31 (2002) 126
9. Danforth R.A., Dus I., and Mah J. 3-D volume imaging for dentistry: A new dimension. Can Dent Assoc J 31 (2003) 817
10. Carter R.B., and Keen E.N. Intramandibular course of the inferior alveolar nerve. J Anat 108 (1970) 433
11. Werhmann A.H., and Manson-Hing L.R. Dental Radiology. (ed 5) (1981), Mosby, St. Louis
12. Stella J.P., and Tharanon W. A precise radiographic method to determine the location of the inferior alveolar canal in the posterior edentulous mandible: Implications for dental implants. Part I: Technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 5 (1990) 15
13. Pawelzik J., Cobnen M., Willers R., et al. : A comparison of conventional panoramic radiographs with volumetric computed tomography images in the preoperative assessment of impacted third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60 (2002) 979
14. Benediktsdottir I.S., Hintze H., Petersen J.K., et al. Image quality of 2 solid state and 3 photostimulable phosphor plate digital panoramic systems, and treatment planning of mandibular third molar removal. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 32 (2003) 39
15. Ludlow J.B., Davies-Ludlow L.E., and Brooks S.L. Dosimetry of two extra-oral direct digital imaging devices: Newton cone beam CT and Orthophos PlusDS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 32 (2003) 229