Comparison of cone-beam imaging with orthopantomography and computerized tomography for assessment in presurgical implant dentistry

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 216-225

  Dreiseidler, Timo ^a   Mischkowski, Robert A ^a   Neugebauer, Jörg ^a   Ritter, Lutz ^a   Zöller, Joachim E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Computerized tomography; Cone beam imaging; Dental implants; Digital volume tomography; Panoramic tomography; Three dimensional imaging

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOGRAPHY; REFERENCE VALUE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; REFERENCE VALUES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 69849107148     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Sakakura CE, Morais JA, Loffredo LC, Scaf G. A survey of radiographic prescription in dental implant assessment. Dento- maxillofac Radiol 2003;32:397-400.
2. Lam EW, Ruprecht A, Yang J. Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning. J Prosthet Dent 1995,74:42-46.
3. Freisfeld M, Dahl IA, Jager A, Drescher D, Schuller H. X-ray diagnosis of impacted upper canines in panoramic radiographs and computed tomographs. J Orofac Orthop 1999;60:177-184.
4. White SC, Heslop EW, Hohender LG, Mosier KM, Ruprecht A, Shrout MK. Parameters of radiologic care: An official report of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;91: 498-511.
5. Garg AK, Vicari A. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry. Implant Soc 1995; 5:7-11.
6. DelBalso AM, Greiner FG, Licata M. Role of diagnostic imaging in evaluation of the dental implant patient. Radiographics 1994;14:699-719.
7. Hatcher DC, Dial C, Mayorga C. Cone beam CT for pre-surgical assessment of implant sites. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003;31 : 825-833.
8. Tal H, Moses O. A comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1991;20:40-42.
9. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A. Martini PT, Andreis IA.A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone- beam technique: Preliminary results.Eur Radiol 1998;8: 1558-1564.
10. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106: 106-114.
11. Cohnen M, Kemper J, Mobes O, Pawelzik J, Modder U. Radiation dose in dental radiology. Eur Radiol 2002;12:634-637.
12. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: New Tom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003;32:229-234.
13. Visser H, Hermann KP, Bredemeier S, Kohler B. [Dose measurements comparing conventional and digital panoramic radiography]. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 2000;4:213-216.
14. Broer N, Fuhrmann A, Bremen S, Schulze D, Kahl-Nieke B. Evaluation of transversal slice imaging in the diagnosis of tooth displacement with special consideration of the upper canines. J Orofac Orthop 2005;66:94-109.
15. Mah JK, Danforth RA, Bumann A, Hatcher D. Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96:508-513.
16. Hagtvedt T, Aalokken TM, Notthellen J, Kolbenstvedt A. A new low-dose CT examination compared with standard-dose CT in the diagnosis of acute sinusitis. Eur Radiol 2003;13:976-980. (Pubitemid 36790589)
17. Harris D, Buser D, Dula K, et al. E.A.O. guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointe- gration in Trinity College Dublin. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13:566-570.
18. Jacobs R, Mraiwa N, Van Steenberghe D, Sanderink G,Quiry- nen M. Appearance of the mandibular incisive canal on panoramic radiographs.Surg Radiol Anat 2004;26:329-333.
19. Hilgers ML, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Farman AG. Accuracy of linear temporomandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:803-811.
20. Tsiklakis K, Syriopoulos K, Stamatakis HC. Radiographic examination of the temporomandibular joint using cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33: 196-201.
21. Mischkowski RA, Pulsfort R, Ritter L, et al. Geometric accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam device for maxillofacial imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104:551-559.
22. Ritter L, DreiseidlerT, Keeve E, Mischkowski RA, Neugebauer J, Zoller JE. A novel 3D cone-beam imaging device:The influence of patient age and BMI on image quality. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2006;1(suppl):423-424.
23. Hripcsak G, Heitjan DF. Measuring agreement in medical informatics reliability studies. J Biomed Inform 2002;35:99-110.