Competence-based teacher education: A change from Didaktik to Curriculum culture?

Journal of Curriculum Studies

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 61-87

  Pantić, Nataša ^a   Wubbels, Theo ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Competence; Curriculum; Didaktik; educational change; teacher education

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858024981     PISSN: 00220272     EISSN: 13665839     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220272.2011.620633     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Anchan, J. P., Fullan, M. and Polyzoi, E. 2003. Change forces in post-communist Eastern Europe: education in transition, London: Routledge Falmer.
2. Arthur, L. 2006. Higher education and the knowledge society: issues, challenges and responses in Norway and Germany. Research in Comparative and International Education, 1(3): 241-252.
3. Barnett, R. 1994. The Limits of Competence: Knowledge, Higher Education and Society, Buckingham: Society of Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
4. Beijaard, D., Verloop, N. and Vermunt, J.D. 2000. Teacher's perceptions of professional identity: an exploratory study from a personal knowledge perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16: 749-764.
5. Blömeke, S. 2006. Globalization and educational reform in German teacher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 45: 315-324.
6. Carr, D. 1999. Professional education and professional ethics. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 16(1): 33-46.
7. st century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57: 300-314.
8. Day, C. 2002. School reform and transitions in teacher professionalism and identity. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(8): 677-692.
9. Day, C., Assuncao Flores, M. and Viana, I. 2007. Effects of national policies on teachers' sense of professionalism: findings from an empirical study in Portugal and in England. European Journal of Teacher Education, 30(3): 249-265.
10. Fives, H. and Buehl, M. M. 2008. What do teachers believe? Developing a framework for examining beliefs about teachers' knowledge and ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2): 134-176.
11. Fullan, M. 1993. Change forces: probing the depths of educational reform, London: Falmer Press.
12. Garm, N. and Karlsen, G.E. 2004. Teacher education reform in Europe: the case of Norway: trends and tensions in a global perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20: 731-744.
13. Geertz, C. 1973. The interpretation of cultures: selected essays, New York: Basic Books.
14. Grossman, G.M., Onkol, P. E. and Sands, M. 2007. Curriculum reform in Turkish teacher education: attitudes of teacher educators towards change in an EU candidate nation. International Journal of Educational Development, 27: 138-150.
15. Grossman, P. L. and Stodolsky, S. S. 1995. Content as context: the role of school subjects in secondary school teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(8): 5-11.
16. Gudmundsdottir, S., Reinertsen, A. and Nordtomme, N. P. 2000. "Klafki's Didaktik analysis as a conceptual framework for research on teaching". In Teaching as a Reflective Practice: The German Didaktik Tradition, Edited by: Westbury, I., Hopmann, S. and Riquarts, K. 319-334. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
17. Harris, A. 1997. "The deprofessionalization and deskilling of teachers". In Teachers, Teacher Education and Training, Edited by: Watson, K., Modgil, C. and Modgil, S. 57-65. London: Cassel.
18. Hopmann, S. 2000. "Klafki's model of Didaktik analysis and lesson planning in teacher education". In Teaching as a Reflective Practice: The German Didaktik Tradition, Edited by: Westbury, I., Hopmann, S. and Riquarts, K. 197-206. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
19. Hopmann, S. 2003. On the evaluation of curriculum reforms. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(4): 459-478.
20. Hopmann, S. 2007. Restrained teaching: the common core of Didaktik. European Educational Research Journal, 6(2): 109-124.
21. Hopmann, S. and Künzli, R. 1997. Close our schools! against current trends in policy making, educational theory and curriculum studies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29(3): 259-266.
22. Hudson, B. 2002. Holding complexity and searching for meaning: teaching as reflective practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(1): 43-57.
23. Hudson, B. 2007. Comparing different traditions of teaching and learning: what can we learn about teaching and learning?. European Educational Research Journal, 6(2): 135-146.
24. Huizen, P., Oers, B. and Wubbels, T. 2005. A Vygotskian perspective on teacher education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(3): 267-290.
25. Klaassen, C. A. 2002. Teacher pedagogical competence and sensibility. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18: 151-158.
26. Klafki, W. 2000. "Didaktik analysis as the core of preparation of instruction". In Teaching as a Reflective Practice: The German Didaktik Tradition, Edited by: Westbury, I., Hopmann, S. and Riquarts, K. 139-159. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
27. Korthagen, F. A. J. 2001. Linking practice and theory: the pedagogy of realistic teacher education, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28. Korthagen, F. A. J. 2004. In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(1): 77-97.
29. Koster, B., Brekelmans, M., Korthagen, F. and Wubbels, T. 2005. Quality requirements for teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2): 157-176.
30. Künzli, R. 2000. "German Didaktik: Models of Re-presentation, of Intercourse, and of Experience". In Teaching as a Reflective Practice: The German Didaktik Tradition, Edited by: Westbury, I., Hopmann, S. and Riquarts, K. 41-54. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
31. Lauglo, J. 1995. Forms of decentralisation and their implications for education. Comparative Education, 31(1): 5-29.
32. Libman, Z. and Zuzovsky, R. 2006. Standards of teaching and teaching tests: Is this the right way to go?. Studies in Educational Evaluations, 32(1): 37-52.
33. Liston, D. P. and Zeichner, K. M. 1990. Reflective teaching and action research in pre-service teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 16(3): 235-254.
34. Merriam, S. B. 1998. Qualitative research and case study applications in education, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35. Noddings, N. 1984. Caring, a feminine approach to ethics & moral education, Berkeley: University of California Press.
36. Ostinelli, G. 2009. Teacher education in Italy, Germany, England, Sweden and Finland. European Journal of Education, 44(2): 291-308.
37. Pantić, N. and Wubbels, T. 2010. Teacher competencies as a basis for teacher education - views of Serbian teachers and teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3): 694-703.
38. Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P. and Taubman, P. M. 1995. Understanding Curriculum, New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
39. Price, J. N. 2001. Action research, pedagogy and change: the transformative potential of action research in pre-service teacher education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(1): 43-74.
40. Radó, P. 2001. Transition in education: policy making and the key educational policy areas in the Central-European and Baltic states, Budapest: Open Society Institute, Institute for Educational Policy.
41. Radó, P. 2010. Governing decentralized education systems, Systemic change in the South-East European context Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative, Open Society Foundations.
42. Reid, W. A. 1997. Principle and pragmatism in English curriculum making 1868-1918. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29(6): 667-682.
43. Sayer, J. 2006. European perspectives of teacher education and training. Comparative Education, 42(1): 63-75.
44. Shulman, L. 1987. Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1): 1-22.
45. Singer-Gabella, M. and Tiedemann, P. 2008. Tasks and trajectories in learning to teach. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(4): 457-480.
46. Stoof, A., Martens, R., van Merriënboer, J. and Bastiaens, T. 2002. The boundary approach of competence: a constructivist aid for understanding and using the concept of competence. Human Resource Development Review, 1: 345-365.
47. Tigelaar, D. E. H., Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P. and van der Vleuten, C. P. M. 2004. The development and validation of a framework for teaching competencies in higher education. Higher Education, 48(2): 253-268.
48. Tyler, R. W. 1949. Basic principles of curriculum and instruction, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49. Valli, L. and Rennert-Ariev, P. 2002. New standards and assessments: Curriculum transformation in teacher education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(2): 201-235.
50. van Tartwijk, J., den Brok, P., Veldman, I. and Wubbels, T. 2009. Teachers' practical knowledge about classroom management in multicultural classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25: 453-460.
51. Verloop, N., Driel, J. V. and Meijer, P. 2001. Teacher knowledge and the knowledge base for teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 35: 441-461.
52. Westbury, I. 1998. "Didaktik and Curriculum studies". In Didaktik and/or Curriculum: An International Dialogue: Vol.41. American University Studies, Education Series XIV, Edited by: Gundem, B. B. and Hopmann, S. 47-78. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
53. Westbury, I. 2000. "Teaching as a reflective practice: what might Didaktik teach Curriculum?". In Teaching as a Reflective Practice: The German Didaktik Tradition, Edited by: Westbury, I., Hopmann, S. and Riquarts, K. 15-40. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
54. Wise, A. 1979. Legislated learning, Berkeley: University of California Press.
55. Wraga, W.G. 1999. 'Extracting Sun-Beams out of Cucumbers': the retreat from practice in reconceptualised curriculum studies. Educational Researcher, 28(1): 4-13.
56. Zgaga, P. 2003. Reforming the universities of South East Europe in view of the Bologna process. Higher Education in Europe, 28(3): 251-258.