Teaching as a reflective practice: What Might Didaktik teach curriculum?

Teaching As A Reflective Practice: The German Didaktik Tradition

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 15-40

  Westbury, Ian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85070001565     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. Airasian, P. (1994). The impact of the taxonomy on testing and evaluation. In L. W. Anderson & L. A. Sosniak (Eds.), Bloom's taxonomy: A forty-year retrospective (93rd Yearbook, Part 2, of the National Society for the Study of Education, pp. 82-102). Chicago: University of Chicago Press
2. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, M. F. (1992). Teacher as curriculum maker. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 363-401). New York: Macmillan
3. Doyle, W. (1992). Curriculum and pedagogy. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 486-516). New York: Macmillan
4. Doyle, W. (1994, April). Why Didaktik might be of interest to Americans. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans (Tucson, AZ: College of Education, University of Arizona)
5. Doyle, W. (1995). Studying the enacted curriculum. InS. Hopmann & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Didaktik and/or Curriculum (pp. 267-288). Kiel, Germany: lnstitut fUr die Padagogik der Naturwissenschaften an der Universitat Kiel
6. Doyle, W., & Westbury, I. (1992). Die Ruckbesinnung auf den Unterrichtsinhalt in der Curriculumund Bildungsforschung in den USA. Bildung und Erzielwng, 45(2), 137-157
7. Dumont, L. (1994). German ideology: From France to Germany and back. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
8. Goertz, M. E., Floden, R. E., & O'Day, J. (1996). Systemic reform (Pub. No. ORAD 96-1322). (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement
9. Grafton, A. (1983). Polyhistor into Philolog: Notes on the transformation of German classical scholarship, 178(}-1850. In C. Schmitt (Ed.), History of universities (Vol. 3, pp. 159-192). Amersham, England: Avebury
10. Hlebowitsh, P. S. (1992). Amid behavioral and behavioristic objectives: Reappraising appraisals of the Tyler Rationale. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(6), 533-547
11. Hopmann, S., & Gundem, B. B. (1998). Didaktik meets curriculum: Towards a new agenda. In B. B. Gundem & Stefan Hopmann (Eds.), Didaktik and/or curriculum. An international dialogue (pp. 331-353). New York: Peter Lang
12. Hopmann, S., & Riquarts, K. (1995). Didaktik and/or curriculum: Basic problems of comparative Didaktik. InS. Hopmann & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Didaktik and/or curriculum (lPN 147, pp. 9-40).Kiel, Germany: Institut fiir die Padagogik der Naturwissenschaften an der Universitat Kiel
13. Humboldt, W. von. (1969). The limits of state action (J. W. Burrow, Ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
14. Jarausch, K. H. (1990a). The German professions in history and theory. In G. Cocks & K. H. Jarausch (Eds.), German professions, 180(}-1950 (pp. 9-26). New York and Oxford, England: Oxford University Press
15. Jarausch, K. H. (1990b ). The unfree professions. German lawyers, teachers, and engi11eers, 190(}-1950. New York: Oxford University Press
16. Kaestle, C. F. (1973a). The evolution of an urban school system: New York City, 175(}-1850. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
17. Kaestle, C. F. (1973b). Joseph Lancaster and the monitorial movement: A documentary history (Classics in Education, No. 47). New York: Teachers College Press
18. Klafki, W. (1995). On the problem of teaching and learning contents from the standpoint of criticakonstructive Didaktik. InS. Hopmann & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Curriculum and/or Didaktik (lPN 147, pp. 187-200). Kiel, Germany: Institut fUr die Padagogik der Naturwissenschaften
19. La Vopa, A. J. (1988). Grace, talent, and merit: Poor students, clerical careers, and professional ideology in eighteenth century Germany Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
20. Lindenfeld, D. F. (1997). The practical imagination: The German sciences of the state in the nineteenth century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
21. Pyenson, L. (1983). Neohumanism and the persistence of pure mathematics in Wilhelm ian Germany (Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 150). Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society
22. Reid, W. A. (1998). Systems and structures or myths and fables? A cross-cultural perspective on curriculum content. In B. B. Gundem & S. Hopmann (Eds.), Didaktik and/or curriculum: An international dialogue (pp. 11-27). New York: Peter Lang
23. Ringer, F. (1990). "Bildung" and its implications in the German tradition, 189D-1930. In W. Nijhof (Ed.), Values in higher education: "Bildungsideale" in historical and contemporary perspective (pp. 1-22). Enschede, Netherlands: University of Twente, Department of Education
24. Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction Chicago: University of Chicago Press
25. Wallin, E. (1998). Changing paradigms of curriculum and/or Didaktik. In B. B. Gundem & S. Hopmann (Eds.), Didaktik and/or curriculum. An international dialogue (pp. 127-146). New Y ark: Peter Lang
26. Westbury, I. (1992). Curriculum studies in the United States: Reflections on a conversation with Ulf Lundgren. In D. Broady (Ed.), Education in the late 20th century: Essays presented to Ulf P Lundgren on the occasion of his fiftieth birthday (pp. 117-140). Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm Institute of Education Press
27. Westbury, I. (1994). Deliberation and the improvement of schooling. In J. T. Dillon (Ed.), Deliberation in education and society (pp. 37-65). Norwood, NJ: Ablex