Building bridges between theory and practice in medical education using a design-based research approach: AMEE Guide No. 60

Medical Teacher

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-10

  Dolmans, Diana H J M ^a   Tigelaar, D ^a,b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; THEORETICAL MODEL;

EDUCATION, MEDICAL; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84855967335     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: 1466187X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.595437     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Albert M, Hodges B, Regehr G. 2007. Research in medical education: Balancing service and science. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 12:103-115
2. Badley G. 2003. The crisis in educational research: A pragmatic approach. Eur Educ Res J 2(2):296-308
3. Barab S, Squire K. 2004. Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. J Learn Sci 13(1):1-14 (Pubitemid 38202848)
4. Berliner DC. 2002. Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educ Res 31(8):18-20
5. Biggs J. 1996. Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. High Educ 32:347-364
6. Biggs J. 1999. Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: SRHE Open University Press
7. Birenbaum M. 2003. New insights into learning and teaching and their implications for assessment. In: Segers M, Dochy F, Cascallar E, editors. Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards. Boston, London: Dordrecht. pp 13-36
8. Boor K, Scheele F, Vleuten CPM, Scherpbier AJJA, Teunissen PW, Sijtsma K. 2007. Psychometric properties of an instrument to measure the clinical learning environment. Med Educ 41:92-99 (Pubitemid 46011047)
9. Brown A. 1992. Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions. J Learn Sci 2:141-178
10. Bunniss S, Kelly DR. 2010. Research paradigms in medical education research. Med Educ 44:358-366
11. Collins A, Joseph D, Bielaczyc K. 2004. Design research: Theoretical and methodogical issues. J Learn Sci 13(1):15-42 (Pubitemid 38202849)
12. Cook DA, Bordage G, Schmidt HG. 2008. Description, justification and clarification: A framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education. Med Educ 42:128-133
13. Daelmans HEM, Hoogenboom RJI, Donker AJM, Scherpbier AJJA, Stehouwer CDA, van der Vleuten C. 2004. Effectiveness of clinical rotations as a learning environment for achieving competence. Med Teach 26(4):305-312 (Pubitemid 38961355)
14. Design-Based Research Collective 2003. Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educ Res 32(1):5-8
15. Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen IHAP, Heineman E, Scherpbier AJJA. 2008. Factors adversely affecting student learning in the clinical learning environment: A student perspective. Educ Health 20(3):e1-e10
16. Dornan T, Boshuizen H, Kind N, Scherpbier A. 2007. Experience-based learning: A model linking the processes and outcomes of medical students workplace learning. Med Educ 41:84-91 (Pubitemid 46011046)
17. Driessen EW, Van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT, Van Tartwijk J, Vermunt J. 2005. The use of qualitative research criteria for portfolio assessment as an alternative to reliability evaluation: A case study. Med Educ 39(2):214-220 (Pubitemid 40278548)
18. Eva K. 2009. Broadening the debate about quality in medical education research. Med Educ 43:294-296
19. Grant J, Kilminster S, Jolly B, Cottrell D. 2003. Clinical supervision of SpRs: Where does it happen, when does it happen and is it effective. Med Educ 37:140-148 (Pubitemid 36363328)
20. Gruppen LD. 2008. Is medical education research hard or soft research? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 13(1):1-2
21. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. 1989. Fourth generation evaluation. London: Sage.
22. Hofman KG, Donaldson JE. 2004. Contextual tensions of the clinical environment and their influence on teaching and learning. Med Educ 38:448-454
23. Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ. 2004. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educ Res 33(7):14-26 (Pubitemid 39519587)
24. Kelly A. 2004. Design research in education: Yes, but is it methodological? J Learn Sci 13(1):115-128 (Pubitemid 38202853)
25. Kember D. 2003. To control or not to control: The question of whether experimental designs are appropriate for evaluating teaching innovations in higher education. Assess Eval High Educ 28(1):89-101
26. Kilminster S, Cottrell D, Grant J, Jolly B. 2007. AMEE Guide No. 27: Effective educational and clinical supervision. Med Teach 29:2-19 (Pubitemid 46887833)
27. Kuper A, Reeves S, Levinson W. 2008. Qualitative research. An introduction to reading and appraising qualitative research. BMJ 337:a288, doi: 10.1136/bmj.a288
28. Longhurst N, Norton LS. 1997. Self-assessment in coursework essays. Stud Educ Eval 23:319-330 (Pubitemid 127169611)
29. McKenney S, Nieveen N, van den Akker J. 2006. Design research from a curriculum perspective. In: van den Akker J, Gravemeijer K, McKenney S, Nieveen N, editors. Educational design research. London: Routledge. pp 67-90
30. Monrouxe L, Rees CE. 2009. Picking up the gauntlet: Constructing medical education as a social science. Med Educ 43:196-198
31. Nieveen N, McKenney S, van den Akker J. 2006. Educational design research: The value of variety. In: van den Akker J, Gravemeijer K, McKenney S, Nieveen N, editors. Educational design research. London: Routledge. pp 151-159
32. Norcini JJ. 2003. Work based assessment. BMJ 326(7392):753-755
33. Norman G. 2007. Editorial - how bad is medical education research anyway? Adv Health Sci Educ 12:1-5
34. Pope C, Mays N. 2009. Critical reflections on the rise of qualitative research. BMJ 339:737-739
35. Reeves S, Albert M, Kuper A, Hodges BD. 2008. Qualitative research. Why use theories in qualitative research? BMJ 337:a949, doi: 10.1136/ bmj.a949
36. Reeves TC, Herrington J, Oliver R. 2005. Design research: A socially responsible approach to instructional technology research in higher education. J Comput High Educ 16(2):96-115 (Pubitemid 40230775)
37. Regehr G. 2010. Its not rocket science: Rethinking our metaphors for research in health professions education. Med Educ 44:31-39
38. Segers M. 2004. Assessment en leren als een twee-eenheid: Onderzoek naar de impact van assessment op leren. [The dyad of assessment and learning: A study of the impact of assessment on learning.] Inaugural address given at the acceptance of professorship in Pedagogics, Educational Sciences in particular, at Leiden University. Leiden: Leiden University
39. Schifferdecker K, Reed VA. 2009. Using mixed methods research in medical education: Basic guidelines for researchers. Med Educ 43:637-644
40. Schuwirth LW, van der Vleuten CP. 2004. Changing education, changing assessment, changing research? Med Educ 38(8):805-812 (Pubitemid 39061816)
41. Shephard LA. 2000. The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educ Res 29(7):4-14
42. Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen IHAP, Muijtjens AMM, Scherpbier AJJA. 2008. The development of an instrument for evaluating clinical teachers: Involving stakeholders to determine content validity. Med Teach 30:e272-e277
43. Stalmeijer R, Dolmans D, Wolfhagen I, Muijtjens A, Scherpbier A. 2010. The Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire (MTCQ) as a valid and reliable instrument for the evaluation of clinical teachers. Acad Med 85(11):1732-1738
44. Teunissen PW, Scheele F, Scherpbier AJJA, van der Vleuten CPM, Boor K, van Luijk SJ, van Diemen-Steenvoorde JAAM. 2007. How residents learn: Qualitative evidence for the pivotal role of clinical activities. Med Educ 41:763-770 (Pubitemid 47125323)
45. Tigelaar DEH, Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen HAP, Van der Vleuten CPM. 2004a. The development and validation of a framework for teaching competencies in higher education. High Educ 48:253-268 (Pubitemid 38926338)
46. Tigelaar DEH, Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen HAP, Van der Vleuten CPM. 2004b. Using a conceptual framework and the opinions of portfolio experts to develop a teaching portfolio prototype. Stud Educ Eval 30(3):305-321
47. Tigelaar DEH, Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen HAP, Van der Vleuten CPM. 2005. Quality issues in judging portfolios: Implications for organizing teaching portfolio assessment procedures. Stud High Educ 30(5):595-610 (Pubitemid 41441515)
48. Tigelaar DEH, Dolmans DHJM, De Grave WS, Wolfhagen HAP, Van der Vleuten CPM. 2006a. Portfolio as a tool to stimulate teachers reflections. Med Teach 28(3):277-282 (Pubitemid 43840698)
49. Tigelaar DEH, Dolmans DHJM, De Grave WS, Wolfhagen HAP, Van der Vleuten CPM. 2006b. Participants opinions on the usefulness of a teaching portfolio. Med Educ 40(4):371-378
50. Tigelaar DEH, Dolmans DHJM, Meijer PC, de Grave WS, van der Vleuten CPM. 2008. Teachers interactions and their collaborative reflection processes during peer meetings. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 13(3):289-308
51. Van den Akker J, Gravemeijer K, McKenney S, Nieveen N., editors. 2006. Educational design research. London: Routeledge
52. Van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth L. 2005. Assessment of professional competence: From methods to programmes. Adv Health Sci Educ 1(1):41-67
53. Van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT, Driessen E, Dijkstra J, Tigelaar DEH, Baartman LKJ, Van Tartwijk J. submitted. A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose
54. Wamsley MA, Dubowitz N, Kohli P, Cooke M, OBrien BC. 2009. Continuity in a longitudinal out-patient attachment for year 3 medical students. Med Educ 43:895-906
55. Wimmers PF, Schmidt HG, Splinter TAW. 2006. Influence of clerkship experiences on clinical competence. Med Educ 40:450-458