Research paradigms in medical education research

Medical Education

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 358-366

  Bunniss, Suzanne ^a   Kelly, Diane R ^a  

^a NHS EDUCATION FOR SCOTLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EDUCATIONAL MODEL; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; RESEARCH; STANDARD;

EDUCATION, MEDICAL; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; RESEARCH; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 77949893609     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03611.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Todres M, Stephenson A, Jones R. Medical education research remains the poor relation. BMJ 2007 335 : 333 335.
2. Bligh J, Brice J. What is the value of good medical education research? Med Educ 2008 42 : 652 653.
3. Dornan T, Peile E, Spencer J. In defence of the existing strengths of medical education research. Med Educ 2009 43 : 391.
4. Lingard L. Qualitative Research in the RIME community: critical reflections and future directions. Acad Med 2007 82 (10 Suppl S129 30.
5. Cook DA, Bordage G, Schmidt HG. Description, justification and clarification: a framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education. Med Educ 2008 42 : 128 133.
6. Bordage G. Conceptual frameworks to illuminate and magnify. Med Educ 2009 43 : 312 319.
7. Monrouxe LV, Rees CE. Picking up the gauntlet: constructing medical education as a social science. Med Educ 2009 43 : 196 198.
8. Albert M. Understanding the debate on medical education research: a sociological perspective. Acad Med 2004 79 (10 948 954.
9. Cook DA. Avoiding confounded comparisons in education research. Med Educ 2009 43 : 102 104.
10. Eva K. Broadening the debate about quality in medical education research. Med Educ 2009 43 : 294 296.
11. Stephenson A, Todres M, Jones R. Reply to Dornan et al.'s 'On evidence'. Med Educ 2009 43 : 390 391.
12. Kuper A, Reeves S, Albert M, Hodges BD. Assessment: do we need to broaden our methodological horizons? Med Educ 2007 41 : 1121 1123.
13. Dornan T, Peile E, Spencer J. 'On evidence'. Med Educ 2008 42 : 232 233.
14. Albert M, Hodges BD, Regehr G. Research in medical education: balancing service and science. Adv Health Sci Educ 2007 12 : 103 115.
15. Albert M, Laberge S, Hodges BD, Regehr G, Lingard L. Biomedical scientists' judgements of social science in health research. Soc Sci Med 2008 66 : 2520 2531.
16. Mathers J, Parry J. Why are there so few working-class applicants to medical schools? Med Educ 2009 43 : 219 228.
17. Patterson P, Baron H, Carr V, Plint S, Lane P. Evaluation of three short-listing methodologies for selection into postgraduate training in general practice. Med Educ 2009 43 : 50 7.
18. Derkx H, Rethans JJ, Maiburg B, Winkens R, Knottnerus A. New methodology for using incognito standardised patients for telephone consultation in primary care. Med Educ 2009 43 : 82 8.
19. McNamee LS, O'Brien FY, Botha JH. Students' perceptions of medico-legal autopsy demonstrations in a student-centred curriculum. Med Educ 2009 43 : 66 73.
20. Barbour RS. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? BMJ 2001 322 : 1115 1117.
21. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications 2000.
22. Reeves S, Albert M, Kuper A, Hodges BD. Why use theories in qualitative research? BMJ 2008 337 : 631 634.
23. Britten N. Making sense of qualitative research: a new series. Med Educ 2005 39 : 2 6.
24. Berger PL, Luckmann T. The Social Construction of Reality. New York, NY : Doubleday 1966.
25. Schwandt T. Paths to inquiry in the social sciences: scientific, constructivist, and critical theory methodologies. In : Guba EG, ed. The Paradigm Dialog. Newbury Park, CA : Sage Publications 1990 258 276.
26. Guba EC. The alternative paradigm dialog. In : Guba EC, ed. The Paradigm Dialog. Newbury Park, CA : Sage Publications 1990 17 30.
27. Weaver K, Olson JK. Understanding paradigms used for nursing research. J Adv Nurs 2006 53 (4 459 469.
28. Appleton JV, King L. Constructivism: a naturalistic methodology for nursing inquiry. Adv Nurs Sci 1997 20 (2 13 22.
29. Allen D, Benner P, Diekelmann NL. Three paradigms for nursing research: methodological implications. In : Chinn P, ed. Nursing Research Methodology: Issues and Implementation. Rockville, MD : Aspen 1986 23 38.
30. Guba EC, Lincoln Y. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In : Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications 1994 105 117.
31. Morgan DL. Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. J Mix Methods Res 2007 1 (1 48 76.
32. Tarlier D. Mediating the meaning of evidence through epistemological diversity. Nurs Inq 2005 12 (2 126 134.
33. Karlsson G, Tham K. Correlating facts or interpreting meaning: two different epistemological projects within medical research. Scand J Occup Ther 2006 13 : 68 75.
34. Berwick DM. The science of improvement. JAMA 2008 299 : 1182 1184.
35. Bunniss S, Kelly DR. 'The unknown becomes the known': collective learning and change in primary care teams. Med Educ 2008 42 : 1185 1194.
36. Atkinson PA, Coffey A, Delamont S, Lofland J, Lofland L, eds. Handbook of Ethnography. London : Sage Publications 2001.
37. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. London : Sage Publications 1985.
38. Erlandson DA, Harris EL, Skipper BL, Allen SD. Doing Naturalistic Inquiry. A Guide to Methods. London : Sage Publications 1993.
39. Agar MH. The Professional Stranger. San Diego, CA : Academic Press 1980.
40. Coffey A, Atkinson P. Making Sense of Qualitative Data. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications 1996.
41. Davies P. The radical accuracy of the subjective viewpoint. Br J Gen Pract 2007 57 : 848 849.
42. Hodges B. The many and conflicting histories of medical education in Canada and the USA: an introduction to the paradigm wars. Med Educ 2005 39 : 613 621.
43. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. Educ Commun Technol J 1982 30 (4 233 252.