The development of an instrument for evaluating clinical teachers: Involving stakeholders to determine content validity

Medical Teacher

Volumn 30, Issue 8, 2008, Pages

  Stalmeijer, Renée E ^a   Dolmans, Diana H J M ^a   Wolfhagen, Ineke H A P ^a   Muijtjens, Arno M M ^a   Scherpbier, Albert J J A ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EDUCATION; CLINICAL SUPERVISION; COGNITIVE APPRENTICESHIP MODEL; CONTENT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; HEALTH EDUCATOR; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEDICAL STUDENT; PHYSICIAN; QUALITY CONTROL; TEACHER; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL; FACULTY, MEDICAL; HUMANS; NETHERLANDS;

EID: 57349199272     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: 1466187X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01421590802258904     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Beckman, TJ, Ghosh, AK, Cook, DA, Erwin, PJ and Mandrekar, JN (2004) How reliable are assessments of clinical teaching? A review of the published instruments. J Gen Intern Med, 19, pp. 971-977.
2. Beckman, TJ, Lee, MC, Rohren, CH and Pankratz, VS (2003) Evaluating an instrument for the peer review of inpatient teaching. Med Teach, 25, pp. 131-135.
3. Bowden, J. and Marton, F. (2000) The University of Learning, Kogan Page Limited, London
4. Cohen, J. (1987) Statistical Power Analysis for Behavioral Sciences, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
5. Collins, A., Brown, JS and Newman, SE (1989) Cognitive apprenticeship: teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Hillsdale, New Jersey
6. Copeland, HL and Hewson, MG (2000) Developing and testing an instrument to measure the effectiveness of clinical teaching in an academic medical centre. Acad Med, 75, pp. 161-166.
7. Cottrell, D., Kilminster, S., Jolly, B. and Grant, J. (2002) What is effective supervision and how does it happen? A critical incident study. Med Educ, 36, pp. 1042-1049.
8. Dolmans, DHJM, Wolfhagen, HAP, Essed, GGM, Scherpbier, AJJA and Van der Vleuten, CPM (2002) Students' perceptions of relationships between some educational variables in the out-patient setting. Med Educ, 36, pp. 735-741.
9. Elzubeir, MA and Rizk, DEE (2001) Identifying characteristics that students, interns and residents look for in their role models. Med Educ, 35, pp. 272-277.
10. Grant, J., Kilminster, S., Jolly, B. and Cottrell, D. (2006) Clinical supervision of SpRs: Where does it happen, when does it happen and is it effective?. Med Educ, 37, pp. 140-148.
11. Guba, EG and Lincoln, YS (1989) Fourth Generation Evaluation, Sage Publications, London, Newbury Park
12. Harvey, L. and Green, D. (1993) Defining quality. Assess Eval Higher Educ, 18, pp. 9-34.
13. Hojat, M. and Xu, G. (2004) A visitor's guide to effect sizes. Statistical significance versus practical (clinical) importance of research findings. Adv Health Sci Educ, 9, pp. 241-249.
14. Kilminster, SM and Jolly, BC (2000) Effective supervision in clinical practice settings: A literature review. Med Educ, 34, pp. 827-840.
15. Litzelman, DK, Stratos, GA, Marriott, DJ, Lazaridis, EN and Skeff, KM (1998) Beneficial and harmful effects of augmented feedback on physicians' clinical-teaching performances. Acad Med, 73, pp. 324-332.
16. Litzelman, DK, Stratos, GA, Marriott, DJ and Skeff, KM (1998) Factorial validation of a widely disseminated educational framework for evaluating clinical teachers. Acad Med, 73, pp. 688-695.
17. Spencer, J. (2003) Learning and teaching in the clinical environment. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine. Br Med J, 326, pp. 591-594.