Educational design research: The value of variety

Educational Design Research

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 151-158

  Nieveen, Nienke ^a   McKenney, Susan ^a   van den Akker, Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145519133     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203088364-21     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. Bannan-Ritland, B. (2003). The role of design in research: The integrative learning design framework. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 21-4.
2. Barab, S. and Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14.
3. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(22), 141-78.
4. Burkhardt, H. and Schoenfeld, A. (2003). Improving educational research: Toward a more useful, more influential and better-funded enterprise. Educational Researcher, 32(9), 3-14.
5. Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Lagemann and L. Shulman (eds), Issues in Education Research: Problems and Possibilities (pp. 15-22). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Dede, C. (2004). If design-based research is the answer, what is the question? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 105-14.
7. diSessa, A. A. and Cobb, P. (2004). Ontological innovation and the role of theory in design experiments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 77-103.
8. Edelson, D. C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 105-22.
9. Kelly, A. (2003). Research as design. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 3-4.
10. McKenney, S. and van den Akker, J. (2005). Computer-based support for curriculum designers: A case of developmental research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(2), 41-66.
11. Nieveen, N. and van den Akker, J. (1999). Exploring the potential of a computer tool for instructional developers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(3), 77-98.
12. Reeves, T., Herrington, J., and Oliver, R. (2005). Design research: A socially responsible approach to instructional technology research in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(2), 97-116.
13. Richey, R. and Klein, J. (2005). Developmental research methods: Creating knowledge from instructional design and development practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(2), 23-38.
14. Richey, R., Klein, J. and Nelson, W. (2004). Developmental research: Studies of instructional design and development. In D. Jonassen (ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology (second edition) (pp. 1099-130). Bloomington, IN: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
15. Richey, R. and Nelson, W. (1996). Developmental research. In D. Jonassen (ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 1213-45). London: Macmillan.
16. van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In J. van den Akker, R. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, and T. Plomp (eds), Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training (pp. 1-15). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
17. van den Akker, J. and McKenney, S. (2004). How can developmental research improve science curriculum policies and practices? Presentation at the NARST annual meeting, 1-4 April, Vancouver.
18. Zaritsky, A., Kelly, A., Flowers, W., Rogers, E., and O’Neill, P. (2003). Clinical design sciences: A view from sister design efforts. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 32-4.