On the use of distance constraints in protein-protein docking computations

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 80, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 194-205

  Shih, Edward S C ^a,b,c   Hwang, Ming Jing ^a,b  

^a Taiwan International Graduate Program   (Taiwan)

^b INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

CAPRI; Complex structure prediction; DPPD; Protein protein interaction; ZDOCK

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; MOLECULAR DOCKING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, QUATERNARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY;

EID: 83555179143     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.23179     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Smith GR, Sternberg MJ. Prediction of protein-protein interactions by docking methods. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002; 12(1): 28-35.
2. Chen R, Weng Z. A novel shape complementarity scoring function for protein-protein docking. Proteins 2003; 51(3): 397-408.
3. Gabb HA, Jackson RM, Sternberg MJ. Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. J Mol Biol 1997; 272(1): 106-120.
4. Katchalski-Katzir E, Shariv I, Eisenstein M, Friesem AA, Aflalo C, Vakser IA. Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992; 89(6): 2195-2199.
5. Fernandez-Recio J, Totrov M, Abagyan R. ICM-DISCO docking by global energy optimization with fully flexible side-chains. Proteins 2003; 52(1): 113-117.
6. Gray JJ. High-resolution protein-protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006; 16(2): 183-193.
7. Comeau SR, Gatchell DW, Vajda S, Camacho CJ. ClusPro: a fully automated algorithm for protein-protein docking. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32(Web Server issue): W96-W99.
8. Duan Y, Reddy BV, Kaznessis YN. Physicochemical and residue conservation calculations to improve the ranking of protein-protein docking solutions. Protein Sci 2005; 14(2): 316-328.
9. Jackson RM, Gabb HA, Sternberg MJ. Rapid refinement of protein interfaces incorporating solvation: application to the docking problem. J Mol Biol 1998; 276(1): 265-285.
10. Kozakov D, Hall DR, Beglov D, Brenke R, Comeau SR, Shen Y, Li K, Zheng J, Vakili P, Paschalidis I, Vajda S. Achieving reliability and high accuracy in automated protein docking: ClusPro, PIPER, SDU, and stability analysis in CAPRI rounds 13-19. Proteins 2010; 78(15): 3124-3130.
11. Fiorucci S, Zacharias M. Binding site prediction and improved scoring during flexible protein-protein docking with ATTRACT. Proteins 2010; 78(15): 3131-3139.
12. Huang SY, Zou X. MDockPP: A hierarchical approach for protein-protein docking and its application to CAPRI rounds 15-19. Proteins 2010; 78(15): 3096-3103.
13. Eisenstein M, Ben-Shimon A, Frankenstein Z, Kowalsman N. CAPRI targets T29-T42: proving ground for new docking procedures. Proteins 2010; 78(15): 3174-3181.
14. Mashiach E, Schneidman-Duhovny D, Peri A, Shavit Y, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. An integrated suite of fast docking algorithms. Proteins 2010; 78(15): 3197-3204.
15. Hwang H, Vreven T, Pierce BG, Hung JH, Weng Z. Performance of ZDOCK and ZRANK in CAPRI rounds 13-19. Proteins 2010; 78(15): 3104-3110.
16. Qin S, Zhou HX. Selection of near-native poses in CAPRI rounds 13-19. Proteins 2010; 78(15): 3166-3173.
17. Mendez R, Leplae R, Lensink MF, Wodak SJ. Assessment of CAPRI predictions in rounds 3-5 shows progress in docking procedures. Proteins 2005; 60(2): 150-169.
18. Lensink MF, Mendez R, Wodak SJ. Docking and scoring protein complexes: CAPRI 3rd edition. Proteins 2007; 69(4): 704-718.
19. Lensink MF, Wodak SJ. Docking and scoring protein interactions: CAPRI 2009. Proteins 2010; 78(15): 3073-3084.
20. Alber F, Forster F, Korkin D, Topf M, Sali A. Integrating diverse data for structure determination of macromolecular assemblies. Annu Rev Biochem 2008; 77: 443-477.
21. Lasker K, Phillips JL, Russel D, Velazquez-Muriel J, Schneidman-Duhovny D, Tjioe E, Webb B, Schlessinger A, Sali A. Integrative structure modeling of macromolecular assemblies from proteomics data. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010; 9(8): 1689-1702.
22. Ritchie DW. Recent progress and future directions in protein-protein docking. Curr Protein Pept Sci 2008; 9(1): 1-15.
23. van Dijk AD, Boelens R, Bonvin AM. Data-driven docking for the study of biomolecular complexes. FEBS J 2005; 272(2): 293-312.
24. Azuma Y, Renault L, Garcia-Ranea JA, Valencia A, Nishimoto T, Wittinghofer A. Model of the ran-RCC1 interaction using biochemical and docking experiments. J Mol Biol 1999; 289(4): 1119-1130.
25. Anand GS, Law D, Mandell JG, Snead AN, Tsigelny I, Taylor SS, Ten Eyck LF, Komives EA. Identification of the protein kinase A regulatory RIalpha-catalytic subunit interface by amide H/2H exchange and protein docking. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100(23): 13264-13269.
26. Sachchidanand, Lequin O, Staunton D, Mulloy B, Forster MJ, Yoshida K, Campbell ID. Mapping the heparin-binding site on the 13-14F3 fragment of fibronectin. J Biol Chem 2002; 277(52): 50629-50635.
27. Clore GM, Schwieters CD. Docking of protein-protein complexes on the basis of highly ambiguous intermolecular distance restraints derived from 1H/15N chemical shift mapping and backbone 15N-1H residual dipolar couplings using conjoined rigid body/torsion angle dynamics. J Am Chem Soc 2003; 125(10): 2902-2912.
28. Maurer MC, Trosset JY, Lester CC, DiBella EE, Scheraga HA. New general approach for determining the solution structure of a ligand bound weakly to a receptor: structure of a fibrinogen Aalpha-like peptide bound to thrombin (S195A) obtained using NOE distance constraints and an ECEPP/3 flexible docking program. Proteins 1999; 34(1): 29-48.
29. Clore GM. Accurate and rapid docking of protein-protein complexes on the basis of intermolecular nuclear Overhauser enhancement data and dipolar couplings by rigid body minimization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97(16): 9021-9025.
30. Tang C, Clore GM. A simple and reliable approach to docking protein-protein complexes from very sparse NOE-derived intermolecular distance restraints. J Biomol NMR 2006; 36(1): 37-44.
31. Chu F, Shan SO, Moustakas DT, Alber F, Egea PF, Stroud RM, Walter P, Burlingame AL. Unraveling the interface of signal recognition particle and its receptor by using chemical cross-linking and tandem mass spectrometry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101(47): 16454-16459.
32. Kalkhof S, Ihling C, Mechtler K, Sinz A. Chemical cross-linking and high-performance Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry for protein interaction analysis: application to a calmodulin/target peptide complex. Anal Chem 2005; 77(2): 495-503.
33. Schulz DM, Ihling C, Clore GM, Sinz A. Mapping the topology and determination of a low-resolution three-dimensional structure of the calmodulin-melittin complex by chemical cross-linking and high-resolution FTICRMS: direct demonstration of multiple binding modes. Biochemistry 2004; 43(16): 4703-4715.
34. Seebacher J, Mallick P, Zhang N, Eddes JS, Aebersold R, Gelb MH. Protein cross-linking analysis using mass spectrometry, isotope-coded cross-linkers, and integrated computational data processing. J Proteome Res 2006; 5(9): 2270-2282.
35. Schulz DM, Kalkhof S, Schmidt A, Ihling C, Stingl C, Mechtler K, Zschornig O, Sinz A. Annexin A2/P11 interaction: new insights into annexin A2 tetramer structure by chemical crosslinking, high-resolution mass spectrometry, and computational modeling. Proteins 2007; 69(2): 254-269.
36. Dimova K, Kalkhof S, Pottratz I, Ihling C, Rodriguez-Castaneda F, Liepold T, Griesinger C, Brose N, Sinz A, Jahn O. Structural insights into the calmodulin-Munc13 interaction obtained by cross-linking and mass spectrometry. Biochemistry 2009; 48(25): 5908-5921.
37. Symmons MF, Bokma E, Koronakis E, Hughes C, Koronakis V. The assembled structure of a complete tripartite bacterial multidrug efflux pump. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106(17): 7173-7178.
38. Dong M, Lam PC, Pinon DI, Abagyan R, Miller LJ. Elucidation of the molecular basis of cholecystokinin peptide docking to its receptor using site-specific intrinsic photoaffinity labeling and molecular modeling. Biochemistry 2009; 48(23): 5303-5312.
39. Knight JL, Mekler V, Mukhopadhyay J, Ebright RH, Levy RM. Distance-restrained docking of rifampicin and rifamycin SV to RNA polymerase using systematic FRET measurements: developing benchmarks of model quality and reliability. Biophys J 2005; 88(2): 925-938.
40. Harikumar KG, Gao F, Pinon DI, Miller LJ. Use of multidimensional fluorescence resonance energy transfer to establish the orientation of cholecystokinin docked at the type A cholecystokinin receptor. Biochemistry 2008; 47(36): 9574-9581.
41. Herrick DZ, Sterbling S, Rasch KA, Hinderliter A, Cafiso DS. Position of synaptotagmin I at the membrane interface: cooperative interactions of tandem C2 domains. Biochemistry 2006; 45(32): 9668-9674.
42. Bhatnagar J, Freed JH, Crane BR. Rigid body refinement of protein complexes with long-range distance restraints from pulsed dipolar ESR. Methods Enzymol 2007; 423: 117-133.
43. Lesk VI, Sternberg MJ. 3D-Garden: a system for modelling protein-protein complexes based on conformational refinement of ensembles generated with the marching cubes algorithm. Bioinformatics 2008; 24(9): 1137-1144.
44. Ritchie DW, Kozakov D, Vajda S. Accelerating and focusing protein-protein docking correlations using multi-dimensional rotational FFT generating functions. Bioinformatics 2008; 24(17): 1865-1873.
45. Dominguez C, Boelens R, Bonvin AM. HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. J Am Chem Soc 2003; 125(7): 1731-1737.
46. Gajda MJ, Tuszynska I, Kaczor M, Bakulina AY, Bujnicki JM. FILTREST3D: discrimination of structural models using restraints from experimental data. Bioinformatics 2010; 26(23): 2986-2987.
47. Brunger AT. Version 1.2 of the crystallography and NMR system. Nat Protoc 2007; 2(11): 2728-2733.
48. Schwieters CD, Kuszewski JJ, Tjandra N, Clore GM. The Xplor-NIH NMR molecular structure determination package. J Magn Reson 2003; 160(1): 65-73.
49. Leitner A, Walzthoeni T, Kahraman A, Herzog F, Rinner O, Beck M, Aebersold R. Probing native protein structures by chemical cross-linking, mass spectrometry, and bioinformatics. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010; 9(8): 1634-1649.
50. Mintseris J, Wiehe K, Pierce B, Anderson R, Chen R, Janin J, Weng Z. Protein-protein docking benchmark 2.0: an update. Proteins 2005; 60(2): 214-216.
51. Lee B, Richards FM. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J Mol Biol 1971; 55(3): 379-400.
52. Tsai L-W. Robot analysis and design: the mechanics of serial and parallel manipulators. New York: John Wiley; 1999.
53. Snyman JA, Kok S. A reassessment of the Snyman-Fatti dynamic search trajectory method for unconstrained global optimization. J Global Optim 2009; 43(1): 67-82.
54. Mintseris J, Pierce B, Wiehe K, Anderson R, Chen R, Weng Z. Integrating statistical pair potentials into protein complex prediction. Proteins 2007; 69(3): 511-520.
55. Pierce B, Weng Z. A combination of rescoring and refinement significantly improves protein docking performance. Proteins 2008; 72(1): 270-279.
56. Bahadur RP, Zacharias M. The interface of protein-protein complexes: analysis of contacts and prediction of interactions. Cell Mol Life Sci 2008; 65(7-8): 1059-1072.
57. Pons C, Grosdidier S, Solernou A, Perez-Cano L, Fernandez-Recio J. Present and future challenges and limitations in protein-protein docking. Proteins 2010; 78(1): 95-108.
58. Ulrich EL, Akutsu H, Doreleijers JF, Harano Y, Ioannidis YE, Lin J, Livny M, Mading S, Maziuk D, Miller Z, Nakatani E, Schulte CF, Tolmie DE, Kent Wenger R, Yao H, Markley JL. BioMagResBank. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36(Database issue): D402-D408.
59. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28(1): 235-242.
60. Matthews S, Sawmynaden K, Saouros S, Friedrich N, Marchant J, Simpson P, Bleijlevens B, Blackman MJ, Soldati-Favre D. Structural insights into microneme protein assembly reveal a new mode of EGF domain recognition. Embo Rep 2008; 9(11): 1149-1155.
61. Jin CW, Li Y, Hu YF, Zhang XX, Xu HM, Lescop E, Xia B. Conformational fluctuations coupled to the thiol-disulfide transfer between thioredoxin and arsenate reductase in Bacillus subtilis. J Biol Chem 2007; 282(15): 11078-11083.
62. Prasch S, Schweimer K, Roesch P. Structural basis of transcription elongation control: the NusA-aCTD complex. (PDB ID: 2JZB; DOI:10.2210/pdb2jzb/pdb)
63. Zacharias M. Accounting for conformational changes during protein-protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2010; 20(2): 180-186.
64. Whittaker ET. A treatise on the analytical dynamics of particles and rigid bodies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1937.
65. Yue SY. Distance-constrained molecular docking by simulated annealing. Protein Eng 1990; 4(2): 177-184.
66. Pierce B, Weng Z. ZRANK: reranking protein docking predictions with an optimized energy function. Proteins 2007; 67(4): 1078-1086.
67. Green NS, Reisler E, Houk KN. Quantitative evaluation of the lengths of homobifunctional protein cross-linking reagents used as molecular rulers. Protein Sci 2001; 10(7): 1293-1304.
68. de Vries SJ, Bonvin AM. CPORT: a consensus interface predictor and its performance in prediction-driven docking with HADDOCK. PLoS One 2011; 6(3): e17695.
69. Janin J. Protein-protein docking tested in blind predictions: the CAPRI experiment. Mol Biosyst 2010; 6(12): 2351-2362.