Physicochemical and residue conservation calculations to improve the ranking of protein-protein docking solutions

Protein Science

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 316-328

  Duan, Yuhua ^a   Reddy, Boojala V B ^b   Kaznessis, Yiannis N ^a,b  

^a University of Minnesota   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Binding free energy; Computer simulations; Conservation index; Docking; Molecular recognition; Protein protein interaction

Indexed keywords

ANTIGEN ANTIBODY COMPLEX; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENERGY; EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOCKING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; SOFTWARE; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 13244277453     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1110/ps.04941505     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Ben-Zeev, E. and Eisenstein, M. 2003. Weighted geometric docking: Incorporating external information in the rotation-translation scan. Proteins 52: 24-27.
2. Brooks, B.R., Bruccoleri, R.E., Olfson, B.D., States, D.J., Swaminathan, S., and Karplus, K. 1983. CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J. Comp. Chem. 4: 187-217.
3. Caffrey, D.R., Somaroo, S., Hughes, J.D., Mintseris, J., and Huang, E.S. 2004. Are protein-protein interfaces more conserved in sequence than the rest of the protein surface? Protein Sci. 13: 190-202.
4. Camacho, C.J. and Vajda, S. 2002. Protein-protein association kinetics and protein docking. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12: 3640.
5. Camacho, C.J., Gatchell, D.W., Kimura, S.R., and Vajda, S. 2000a. Scoring docked conformations generated by rigid-body protein-protein docking. Proteins 40: 525-537.
6. Camacho, C.J., Kimura, S.R., DeLisi, C., and Vajda, S. 2000b. Kinetics of desolvation-mediated protein-protein binding. Biophys. J. 78: 1094-1105.
7. Chen, R., Li, L., and Weng, Z. 2003a. ZDOCK: An initial-stage protein-docking algorithm. Proteins 52: 80-87.
8. Chen, R., Mintseris, J., Janin, J., and Weng, Z. 2003b. A protein-protein docking benchmark. Proteins 52: 88-91.
9. Cherfils, J. and Janin, J. 1993. Protein docking algorithms: Simulating molecular recognition. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 3: 265-269.
10. Dennis, S., Kortvelyesi, T., and Vajda, S. 2002. Computational mapping identifies the binding sites of organic solvents on proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99: 4290-4295.
11. Devore, J. and Peck, R. 2001. Statistics: The exploration and analysis of data, 4th ed., p. 136. Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CA.
12. Dominguez, C., Boelens, R., and Bonvin, A.M. 2003. HADDOCK: A protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125: 1731-1737.
13. Ewing, T.J., Makino, S., Skillman, A.G., and Kuntz, I.D. 2001. DOCK 4.0: Search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 15: 411-428.
14. Fahmy, A. and Wagner, G. 2002. TreeDock: A tool for protein docking based on minimizing van der Waals energies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124: 1241-1250.
15. Gabb, H.A., Jackson, R.M., and Sternberg, M.J. 1997. Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. J. Mol. Biol. 272: 106-120.
16. Gardiner, E.J., Willett, P., and Artymiuk, P.J. 2003. GAPDOCK: A Genetic Algorithm Approach to Protein Docking in CAPRI round 1. Proteins 52: 10-14.
17. Glaser, F., Pupko, T., Paz, I., Bell, R.E., Bechor-Shental, D., Martz, E., and Ben-Tal, N. 2003. ConSurf: Identification of functional regions in proteins by surface-mapping of phylogenetic information. Bioinformatics 19: 163-164.
18. Gonnet, G.H., Cohen, M.A., and Benner, S.A. 1992. Exhaustive matching of the entire protein sequence database. Science 256: 1443-1445.
19. Gottschalk, K.E., Neuvirth, H., and Schreiber, G. 2004. A novel method for scoring of docked protein complexes using predicted protein-protein binding sites. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 17: 183-189.
20. Gray, J.J., Moughon, S., Wang, C., Schueler-Furman, O., Kuhlman, B., Rohl, C.A., and Baker, D. 2003. Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. J. Mol. Biol. 331: 281-299.
21. Halperin, I., Ma, B., Wolfson, H., and Nussinov, R. 2002. Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins 47: 409-443.
22. Hawkins, G.D., Gramer, C.J., and Truhlar, D.G. 1996. Parametrized models of aqueous free energies of solvation based on pairwise descreening of solute atomic charges from a dielectric medium. J. Phys. Chem. 100: 19824-19839.
23. Helmer-Citterich, M. and Tramontane, A. 1994. PUZZLE: A new method for automated protein docking based on surface shape complementarity. J. Mol. Biol. 235: 1021-1031.
24. Janin, J. 1995. Protein-protein recognition. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 64: 145-166.
25. Jayaram, B., Sprous, D., and Beveridge, D.L. 1998. Solvation free energy of biomacromolecules: Parameters for a modified generalized Born model consistent with the AMBER force field. J. Phys. Chem. B 102: 9571-9576.
26. Jayaram, B., McConnell, K.J., Dixit, S.B., and Beveridge, D.L. 1999. Free energy analysis of protein-DNA binding: The EcoRI endonuclease-DNA complex. J. Comput. Phys. 151: 333-357.
27. Jones, S. and Thornton, J.M. 1996. Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 93: 13-20.
28. -. 1997. Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using patch analysis. J. Mol. Biol. 272: 133-143.
29. Katchalski-Katzir, E., Shariv, I., Eisenstein, M., Friesem, A.A., Aflalo, C., and Vakser, I.A. 1992. Molecular surface recognition: Determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 89: 2195-2199.
30. Larsen, T.A., Olson, A.J., and Goodsell, D.S. 1998. Morphology of protein-protein interfaces. Structure 6: 421-421.
31. Li, L., Chen, R., and Weng, Z. 2003. RDOCK: Refinement of rigid-body protein docking predictions. Proteins 53: 693-707.
32. Lichtarge, O. and Sowa, M.E. 2002. Evolutionary predictions of binding surfaces and interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12: 21-27.
33. Lichtarge, O., Yao, H., Kristensen, D.M., Madabushi, S., and Mihalek, I. 2003. Accurate and scalable identification of functional sites by evolutionary tracing. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics. 4: 159-166.
34. Lo Conte, L., Chothia, C., and Janin, J. 1999. The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J. Mol. Biol. 285: 2177-2198.
35. Mandell, J.G., Roberts, V.A., Pique, M.E., Kotlovyi, V., Mitchell, J.C., Nelson, E., Tsigelny, L, and Ten Eyck, L.F. 2001. Protein docking using continuum electrostatics and geometric fit. Protein Eng. 14: 105-113.
36. Mihalek, I., Res, I., and Lichtarge, O. 2004. A family of evolution-entropy hybrid methods for ranking protein residues by importance. J. Mol. Biol. 336: 1265-1282.
37. Moont, G., Gabb, H.A., and Sternberg, M.J. 1999. Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes. Proteins 35: 364-373.
38. Morris, G.M., Goodsell, D.S., Halliday, R.S., Huey, R., Hart, W.E., Belew, R.K., and Olson, A.J. 1998. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J. Comput. Chem. 19: 1639-1662.
39. Palma, P.N., Krippahl, L., Wampler, J.E., and Moura, J.J. 2000. BiGGER: A new (soft) docking algorithm for predicting protein interactions. Proteins 39: 372-384.
40. Paul, N. and Rognan, D. 2002. ConsDock: A new program for the consensus analysis of protein-ligand interactions. Proteins 47: 521-533.
41. Richmond, T.J. and Richards, P.M. 1978. Packing of α-helices: Geometrical constraints and contact areas. J. Mol. Biol. 119: 537-555.
42. Ritchie, D.W. and Kemp, G.J. 2000. Protein docking using spherical polar Fourier correlations. Proteins 39: 178-194.
43. Sali, A. and Blundell, T.L. 1990. Definition of general topological equivalence in protein structures. A procedure involving comparison of properties and relationships through simulated annealing and dynamic programming. J. Mol. Biol. 212: 403-428.
44. Shoichet, B.K. and Kuntz, I.D. 1996. Predicting the structure of protein complexes: A step in the right direction. Chem. Biol. 3: 151-156.
45. Smith, G.R. and Sternberg, M.J. 2002. Prediction of protein-protein interactions by docking methods. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12: 28-35.
46. Sternberg, M.J., Gabb, H.A., and Jackson, R.M. 1998. Predictive docking of protein-protein and protein-DNA complexes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 8: 250-256.
47. Taylor, J.S. and Burnett, R.M. 2000. DARWIN: A program for docking flexible molecules. Proteins 41: 173-191.
48. Tsai, C.J., Lin, S.L., Wolfson, H.J., and Nussinov, R. 1997. Studies of protein-protein interfaces: A statistical analysis of the hydrophobic effect. Protein Sci. 6: 53-64.
49. Valdar, W.S. and Thornton, J.M. 2001. Protein-protein interfaces: Analysis of amino acid conservation in homodimers. Proteins 42: 108-124.
50. Wang, Y.H., Zhang, H., and Scott, R.A. 1995. A new computational model for protein-folding based on atomic solvation. Protein Sci. 4: 1402-1411.
51. Yan, C., Dobbs, D., and Honavar, V. 2004. A two-stage classifier for identification of protein-protein interface residues. Bioinformatics 20: i371-i378.
52. Yang, J.M. and Chen, C.C. 2004. GEMDOCK: A generic evolutionary method for molecular docking. Proteins 55: 288-304.