Reciprocal insights into adaptation from agricultural and evolutionary studies in tomato

Evolutionary Applications

Volumn 3, Issue 5-6, 2010, Pages 409-421

  Moyle, Leonie C ^a   Muir, Christopher D ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Agriculture; Ecological genetics; Gene structure and function; Molecular evolution; Population genetics empirical; Quantitative genetics

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958032985     PISSN: 17524563     EISSN: 17524571     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00143.x     Document Type: Article

References (135)

1. Ackerly, D. D., S. A. Dudley, S. E. Sultan, J. Schmitt, J. S. Coleman, C. R. Linder, D. R. Sandquist et al. 2000. The evolution of plant ecophysiological traits: recent advances and future directions. BioScience 50:979-995.
2. Alonso-Blanco, C., B. Mendez-Vigo, and M. Koornneef 2005. From phenotypic to molecular polymorphisms involved in naturally occurring variation of plant development. International Journal of Developmental Biology 49:717-732.
3. Alonso-Blanco, C., M. G. M. Aarts, L. Bentsink, J. J. B. Keurentjes, M. Reymond, D. Vreugdenhil, and M. Koornneef 2009. What has natural variation taught us about plant development, physiology, and adaptation? Plant Cell 21:1877-1896.
4. Alvarez-Ponce, D., M. Aguade, and J. Rozas 2009. Network-level molecular evolutionary analysis of the insulin/TOR signal transduction pathway across 12 Drosophila genomes. Genome Research 19:234-242.
5. Araus, J. L., G. A. Slafer, M. P. Reynolds, and C. Royo 2002. Plant breeding and drought in C-3 cereals: What should we breed for? Annals of Botany 89:925-940.
6. Arntz, A. M., and L. F. Delph 2001. Pattern and process: evidence for the evolution of photosynthetic traits in natural populations. Oecologia 127:455-467.
7. Atherton, J. G., and J. Rudich 1986. The tomato crop: a scientific basis for improvement, pages 661. London, Chapman & Hall.
8. Bai, Y. L., and P. Lindhout 2007. Domestication and breeding of tomatoes: What have we gained and what can we gain in the future? Annals of Botany 100:1085-1094.
9. Barone, A., A. Di Matteo, D. Carputo, and L. Frusciante 2009. High-throughput genomics enhances tomato breeding efficiency. Current Genomics 10:1-9.
10. Bartels, D., and R. Sunkar 2005. Drought and salt tolerance in plants. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 24:23-58.
11. Begun, D. J., A. K. Holloway, K. Stevens, L. W. Hillier, Y. P. Poh, M. W. Hahn, P. M. Nista et al. 2007. Population genomics: whole-genome analysis of polymorphism and divergence in Drosophila simulans. PLoS Biology 5:2534-2559.
12. Bloom, A. J., M. A. Zwieniecki, J. B. Passioura, L. B. Randall, N. M. Holbrook, and D. A. St Clair 2004. Water relations under root chilling in a sensitive and tolerant tomato species. Plant, Cell and Environment 27:971-979.
13. Bohnert, H. J., D. E. Nelson, and R. G. Jensen 1995. Adaptations to environmental stresses. Plant Cell 7:1099-1111.
14. Boyer, J. S. 1982. Plant productivity and environment. Science 218:443-448.
15. Bray, E. A. 1997. Plant responses to water deficit. Trends in Plant Science 2:48-54.
16. Brown, J. H. 1999. Macroecology: progress and prospect. Oikos 87:3-14.
17. Caicedo, A. L., and B. A. Schaal 2004. Heterogeneous evolutionary processes affect R gene diversity in natural populations of Solanum pimpinellifolium. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101:17444-17449.
18. Chan, Y. F., M. E. Marks, F. C. Jones, G. Villarreal, M. D. Shapiro, S. D. Brady, A. M. Southwick et al. 2010. Adaptive evolution of pelvic reduction in sticklebacks by recurrent deletion of a Pitx1 enhancer. Science 327:302-305.
19. Chapin, F. S., K. Autumn, and F. Pugnaire 1993. Evolution of suites of traits in response to environmental stress. American Naturalist 142:S78-S92.
20. Chaves, M. M., and M. M. Oliveira 2004. Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture. Journal of Experimental Botany 55:2365-2384.
21. Chen, K. Y., B. Cong, R. Wing, J. Vrebalov, and S. D. Tanksley 2007. Changes in regulation of a transcription factor lead to autogamy in cultivated tomatoes. Science 318:643-645.
22. Chen, G. X., T. Krugman, T. Fahima, K. G. Chen, Y. G. Hu, M. Roder, E. Nevo, et al. 2010. Chromosomal regions controlling seedling drought resistance in Israeli wild barley, Hordeum spontaneum C. Koch. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 57:85-99.
23. Chetelat, R. T., and Y. Ji 2007. Cytogenetics and evolution. In M. K. Razdan, and A. K. Mattoo, eds. Genetic Improvement of Solanaceous Crops, pp. 77-112. Science Publishers, Enfield, NH.
24. Clark, R. M., T. N. Wagler, P. Quijada, and J. Doebley 2006. A distant upstream enhancer at the maize domestication gene tb1 has pleiotropic effects on plant and inflorescent architecture. Nature Genetics 38:594-597.
25. Collins, N. C., F. Tardieu, and R. Tuberosa 2008. Quantitative trait loci and crop performance under abiotic stress: Where do we stand? Plant Physiology 147:469-486.
26. Comstock, J. P., S. R. McCouch, B. C. Martin, C. G. Tauer, T. J. Vision, Y. B. Xu, and R. C. Pausch 2005. The effects of resource availability and environmental conditions on genetic rankings for carbon isotope discrimination during growth in tomato and rice. Functional Plant Biology 32:1089-1105.
27. Condon, A. G., R. A. Richards, G. J. Rebetzke, and G. D. Farquhar 2004. Breeding for high water-use efficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany 55:2447-2460.
28. Cutler, A. J. 2009. Abscisic Acid (ABA) Encyclopedia of Life Sciences (ELS). John Wiey & Sons, Chichester.
29. Dalziel, A. C., S. M. Rogers, and P. M. Schulte 2009. Linking genotypes to phenotypes and fitness: how mechanistic biology can inform molecular ecology. Molecular Ecology 18:4997-5017.
30. D'Arcy, W. G. 1979. The classification of the Solanaceae. In J. G. Hawkes, R. N. Lester, and A. D. Skelding, eds. The Biology and Taxonomy of the Solanaceae, pp. 3-47. Academic Press, London.
31. Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. John Murray, London.
32. Dudley, S. A. 1996a. Differing selection on plant physiological traits in response to environmental water availability: a test of adaptive hypotheses. Evolution 50:92-102.
33. Dudley, S. A. 1996b. The response to differing selection on plant physiological traits: evidence for local adaptation. Evolution 50:103-110.
34. Eanes, W. F. 1999. Analysis of selection on enzyme polymorphisms. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30:301-326.
35. Easlon, H. M., and J. H. Richards 2009. Drought response in self-compatible species of tomato (Solanaceae). American Journal of Botany 96:605-611.
36. Ehleringer, J. R., and R. K. Monson 1993. Evolutionary and ecological aspects of photosynthetic pathway variation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24:411-439.
37. Ehrenreich, I. M., and M. D. Purugganan 2006. The molecular genetic basis of plant adaptation. American Journal of Botany 93:953-962.
38. Feder, M. E., and T. Mitchell-Olds 2003. Evolutionary and ecological functional genomics. Nature Reviews Genetics 4:651-657.
39. Fernandez, A. I., N. Viron, M. Alhagdow, M. Karimi, M. Jones, Z. Amsellem, A. Sicard et al. 2009. Flexible tools for gene expression and silencing in Tomato. Plant Physiology 151:1729-1740.
40. Fernie, A. R., Y. Tadmor, and D. Zamir 2006. Natural genetic variation for improving crop quality. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 9:196-202.
41. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
42. Flowers, J. M., E. Sezgin, S. Kumagai, D. D. Duvernell, L. M. Matzkin, P. S. Schmidt, and W. F. Eanes 2007. Adaptive evolution of metabolic pathways in Drosophila. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24:1347-1354.
43. Flowers, J. M., Y. Hanzawa, M. C. Hall, R. C. Moore, and M. D. Purugganan 2009. Population genomics of the Arabidopsis thaliana flowering time gene network. Molecular Biology and Evolution 26:2475-2486.
44. Foolad, M. R. 2007. Genome mapping and molecular breeding of tomato. International Journal of Plant Genomics 2007:64358.
45. Foolad, M. R., L. P. Zhang, and P. Subbiah 2003. Genetics of drought tolerance during seed germination in tomato: inheritance and QTL mapping. Genome 46:536-545.
46. Frankel, N., E. Hasson, N. D. Iusem, and M. S. Rossi 2003. Adaptive evolution of the water stress-induced gene Asr2 in Lycopersicon species dwelling in arid habitats. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20:1955-1962.
47. Frary, A., Y. M. Xu, J. P. Liu, S. Mitchell, E. Tedeschi, and S. Tanksley 2005. Development of a set of PCR-based anchor markers encompassing the tomato genome and evaluation of their usefulness for genetics and breeding experiments. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 111:291-312.
48. Gay, A. P., and R. G. Hurd 1975. Influence of light on stomatal density in tomato. New Phytologist 75:37-46.
49. Geber, M. A., and L. R. Griffen 2003. Inheritance and natural selection on functional traits. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164:S21-S42.
50. Giombini, M. I., N. Frankel, N. D. Iusem, and E. Hasson 2008. Nucleotide polymorphism in the drought responsive gene Asr2 in wild populations of tomato. Genetica 136:13-25.
51. Gur, A., and D. Zamir 2004. Unused natural variation can lift yield barriers in plant breeding. PLoS Biology 2:1610-1615.
52. Hahn, M. W. 2009. Distinguishing among evolutionary models for the maintenance of gene duplicates. Journal of Heredity 100:605-617.
53. Hancock, J. F. 2005. Contributions of domesticated plant studies to our understanding of plant evolution. Annals of Botany 96:953-963.
54. Harvey, P. H., and M. D. Pagel 1991. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology: Oxford Series in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
55. Hereford, J. 2009. A quantitative survey of local adaptation and fitness trade-offs. American Naturalist 173:579-588.
56. Heschel, M. S., K. Donohue, N. Hausmann, and J. Schmitt 2002. Population differentiation and natural selection for water-use efficiency in Impatiens capensis (Balsaminaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 163:907-912.
57. Hoekstra, H. E., and J. A. Coyne 2007. The locus of evolution: Evo devo and the genetics of adaptation. Evolution 61:995-1016.
58. Hsiao, T. C. 1973. Plant responses to water stress. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 24:519-570.
59. Jimenez-Gomez, J. M., and J. N. Maloof 2009. Sequence diversity in three tomato species: SNPs, markers, and molecular evolution. BMC Plant Biology 9:85.
60. Johal, G. S., P. Balint-Kurti, and C. F. Well 2008. Mining and harnessing natural variation: a little MAGIC. Crop Science 48:2066-2073.
61. Kacser, H., and J. A. Burns 1973. The control of flux. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology 27:65-104.
62. Kahn, T. L., S. E. Fender, E. A. Bray, and M. A. Oconnell 1993. Characterization of expression of drought and abscisic acid-regulated tomato genes in the drought-resistant species Lycopersicon pennellii. Plant Physiology 103:597-605.
63. Kamenetzky, L., R. Asis, S. Bassi, F. De Godoy, L. Bermudez, A. R. Fernie, M. A. Van Sluys et al. 2010. Genomic analysis of wild tomato (Solanum pennellii) introgression determining metabolic- and yield-associated traits. Plant Physiology 152:1772-1786.
64. Karrenberg, S., and A. Widmer 2008. Ecologically relevant genetic variation from a non-Arabidopsis perspective. Current Opinion In Plant Biology 11:156-162.
65. Kebede, H., B. Martin, J. Nienhuis, and G. King 1994. Leaf anatomy of 2 Lycopersicon species with contrasting gas-exchange properties. Crop Science 34:108-113.
66. Kopp, A. 2009. Metamodels and phylogenetic replication: a systematic approach to the evolution of developmental pathways. Evolution 63:2771-2789.
67. Kozak, K. H., C. H. Graham, and J. J. Wiens 2008. Integrating GIS-based environmental data into evolutionary biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23:141-148.
68. Lambers, H., F. S. Chapin, and T. L. Pons 2008. Plant Physiological Ecology. Springer, New York.
69. Latta, R. G. 2009. Testing for local adaptation in Avena barbata: a classic example of ecotypic divergence. Molecular Ecology 18:3781-3791.
70. Lippman, Z. B., Y. Semel, and D. Zamir 2007. An integrated view of quantitative trait variation using tomato interspecific introgression lines. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 17:545-552.
71. Lister, R., B. D. Gregory, and J. R. Ecker 2009. Next is now: new technologies for sequencing of genomes, transcriptomes, and beyond. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 12:107-118.
72. Ludlow, M. M. 1989. Strategies of response to water stress. In K. H. Kreeb, H. Richter, and T. M. Hinckley, eds. Structural and Functional Responses to Environmental Stresses, pp. 269-281. SPB Academic, The Hague.
73. Maldonado, C., F. A. Squeo, and E. Ibacache 2003. Phenotypic response of Lycopersicon chilense to water deficit. Revista Chilena De Historia Natural 76:129-137.
74. Martin, B., and Y. R. Thorstenson 1988. Stable carbon isotope composition (delta-C-13), water-use efficiency, and biomass productivity of Lycopersicon esculentum, Lycopersicon pennellii, and the F1 hybrid. Plant Physiology 88:213-217.
75. Martin, B., J. Nienhuis, G. King, and A. Schaefer 1989. Restriction fragment length polymorphisms associated with water-use efficiency in tomato. Science 243:1725-1728.
76. Martin, B., C. G. Tauer, and R. K. Lin 1999. Carbon isotope discrimination as a tool to improve water-use efficiency in tomato. Crop Science 39:1775-1783.
77. McKay, J. K., and J. R. Stinchcombe 2008. Ecological genomics of model eukaryotes. Evolution 62:2953-2957.
78. McKay, J. K., J. H. Richards, and T. Mitchell-Olds 2003. Genetics of drought adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana: I. Pleiotropy contributes to genetic correlations among ecological traits. Molecular Ecology 12:1137-1151.
79. McKay, J. K., J. H. Richards, K. S. Nemali, S. Sen, T. Mitchell-Olds, S. Boles, E. A. Stahl, et al. 2008. Genetics of drought adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana II. QTL analysis of a new mapping population, KAS-1 x TSU-1. Evolution 62:3014-3026.
80. Mitchell, J. P., C. Shennan, S. R. Grattan, and D. M. May 1991. Tomato fruit yields and quality under water deficit and salinity. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 116:215-221.
81. Moyle, L. C. 2008. Ecological and evolutionary genomics in the wild tomatoes (Solanum Sect. Lycopersicon). Evolution 62:2995-3013.
82. Mueller, L. A., T. H. Solow, N. Taylor, B. Skwarecki, R. Buels, J. Binns, C. W. Lin et al. 2005. The SOL Genomics Network. A comparative resource for Solanaceae biology and beyond. Plant Physiology 138:1310-1317.
83. Muir, C. D., and L. C. Moyle 2009. Antagonistic epistasis for ecophysiological trait differences between Solanum species. New Phytologist 183:789-802.
84. Nakazato, T., M. Bogonovich, and L. C. Moyle 2008. Environmental factors predict adaptive phenotypic differentiation within and between two wild andean tomatoes. Evolution 62:774-792.
85. Nakazato, T., D. L. Warren, and L. C. Moyle 2010. Ecological and geographic modes of species divergence in wild tomatoes. American Journal of Botany 97:680-693.
86. Nambara, E., and A. Marion-Poll 2005. Abscisic acid biosynthesis and catabolism. Annual Review of Plant Biology 56:165-185.
87. Nesbitt, T. C., and S. D. Tanksley 2002. Comparative sequencing in the genus Lycopersicon: implications for the evolution of fruit size in the domestication of cultivated tomatoes. Genetics 162:365-379.
88. Nevo, E., and G. X Chen 2010. Drought and salt tolerances in wild relatives for wheat and barley improvement. Plant Cell and Environment. 33:670-685.
89. Nielsen, R. 2005. Molecular signatures of natural selection. Annual Review of Genetics 39:197-218.
90. Oakley, T. H. 2007. Today's multiple choice exam: (a) gene duplication; (b) structural mutation; (c) co-option; (d) regulatory mutation; (e) all of the above. Evolution & Development 9:523-524.
91. Olsen, K. M., A. L. Caicedo, N. Polato, A. McClung, S. McCouch, and M. D. Purugganan 2006. Selection under domestication: evidence for a sweep in the rice Waxy genomic region. Genetics 173:975-983.
92. Orr, H. A. 2005. The genetic theory of adaptation: a brief history. Nature Reviews Genetics 6:119-127.
93. Passioura, J. B. 1996. Drought and drought tolerance. Plant Growth Regulation 20:79-83.
94. Patterson, B. D., R. Paull, and R. M. Smillie 1978. Chilling resistance in Lycopersicon hirsutum Humb. and Bonpl. a wild tomato with a wide altitudinal distribution. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 5:609-617.
95. Peralta, I. E., and D. M. Spooner 2001. Granule-bound starch synthase (GBSSI) gene phylogeny of wild tomatoes (Solanum L. section Lycopersicon [Mill.] Wettst. subsection Lycopersicon). American Journal of Botany 88:1888-1902.
96. Peralta, I. E., D. M. Spooner, and S. Knapp 2008. Taxonomy of wild tomatoes and their relatives (Solanum sect Lycopersicoides, sect. Juglandifolia, sect. Lycopersicon; Solanaceae). Systematic Botany Monographs 84:1-186.
97. Phillips, P. C. 2008. Epistasis - the essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems. Nature Reviews Genetics 9:855-867.
98. Purugganan, M. D., and D. Q. Fuller 2009. The nature of selection during plant domestication. Nature 457:843-848.
99. Quiros, C. F. 1991. Lycopersicon cytogenetics. In P. K. Gupta, and T. Tsuchiya, eds. Chromosome Engineering in Plants: Genetics, Breeding, Evolution, pp. 119-137. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
100. Ramsay, H., L. H. Rieseberg, and K. Ritland 2009. The correlation of evolutionary rate with pathway position in plant terpenoid biosynthesis. Molecular Biology and Evolution 26:1045-1053.
101. Rausher, M. D. 2008. Evolutionary transitions in floral color. International Journal of Plant Sciences 169:7-21.
102. Reid, J. B., and A. R. Renquist 1997. Enhanced root production as a feed-forward response to soil water deficit in field-grown tomatoes. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 24:685-692.
103. Renquist, A. R., and J. B. Reid 2001. Processing tomato fruit quality: influence of soil water deficits at flowering and ripening. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 52:793-799.
104. Richards, R. A. 1996. Defining selection criteria to improve yield under drought. Plant Growth Regulation 20:157-166.
105. Rick, C. M. 1973. Potential genetic resources in tomato species: clues from observations in native habitats. In A. M. Srb, ed. Genes, Enzymes, and Populations, pp. 255-269. Plenum Press, New York, NY.
106. Rick, C. M. 1976. Natural variability in wild species of Lycopersicon and its bearing on tomato breeding. Agraria 30:249-259.
107. Rick, C. M. 1978. Tomato Germplasm Resources. The 1st International Symposium on Tropical Tomato. 214-224. Shanhua, Taiwan.
108. Rick, C. M. 1979. Biosystematic studies in Lycopersicon and closely related species of Solanum. In J. G. Hawkes, R. N. Lester, and A. D. Skelding, eds. The Biology and Taxonomy of the Solanaceae, vol. 7, pp. 667-679. Academic Press, London.
109. Romero-Aranda, R., T. Soria, and J. Cuartero 2001. Tomato plant-water uptake and plant-water relationships under saline growth conditions. Plant Science 160:265-272.
110. Rose, L. E., R. W. Michelmore, and C. H. Langley 2007. Natural variation in the Pto disease resistance gene within species of wild tomato (Lycopersicon). II. Population genetics of Pto. Genetics 175:1307-1319.
111. Ross-Ibarra, J., P. L. Morrell, and B. S. Gaut 2007. Plant domestication, a unique opportunity to identify the genetic basis of adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104:8641-8648.
112. Rudich, J., D. Kalmar, C. Geizenberg, and S. Harel 1977. Low water tensions in defined growth stages of processing tomato plants and their effects on yield and quality. Journal of Horticultural Science 52:391-399.
113. Stebbins, G. L. 1952. Aridity as a stimulus to plant evolution. American Naturalist 86:33-44.
114. Stern, D. L., and V. Orgogozo 2008. The loci of evolution: How predictable is genetic evolution? Evolution 62:2155-2177.
115. Stevens, M. A., and J. Rudich 1978. Genetic potential for overcoming physiological limitations on adaptability, yield, and quality in the tomato. Hortscience 13:673-678.
116. Storz, J. F. 2005. Using genome scans of DNA polymorphism to infer adaptive population divergence. Molecular Ecology 14:671-688.
117. Sultan, S. E. 2007. Development in context: the timely emergence of eco-devo. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22:575-582.
118. Tan, C. S. 1993. Tomato yield-evapotranspiration relationships, seasonal canopy temperature and stomatal conductance as affected by irrigation. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 73:257-264.
119. Thakur, P. S. 1990. Different physiological-responses of tomato (Lycopersicon-Esculentum Mill) cultivars to drought. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 12:175-182.
120. Thompson, A. J., A. C. Jackson, R. A. Parker, D. R. Morpeth, A. Burbidge, and I. B. Taylor 2000. Abscisic acid biosynthesis in tomato: regulation of zeaxanthin epoxidase and 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase mRNAs by light/dark cycles, water stress and abscisic acid. Plant Molecular Biology 42:833-845.
121. Thompson, A. J., E. T. Thorne, A. Burbidge, A. C. Jackson, R. E. Sharp, and I. B. Taylor 2004. Complementation of notabilis, an abscisic acid-deficient mutant of tomato: importance of sequence context and utility of partial complementation. Plant, Cell and Environment 27:459-471.
122. Thompson, A. J., B. J. Mulholland, A. C. Jackson, J. M. T. McKee, H. W. Hilton, R. C. Symonds, T. Sonneveld et al. 2007a. Regulation and manipulation of ABA biosynthesis in roots. Plant, Cell and Environment 30:67-78.
123. Thompson, A. J., J. Andrews, B. J. Mulholland, J. M. T. McKee, H. W. Hilton, C. R. Black, and I. B. Taylor 2007b. Overproduction of abscisic acid in tomato increases transpiration efficiency and root hydraulic conductivity and influences leaf expansion. Plant Physiology 143:1905-1917.
124. Ticha, I. 1982. Photosynthetic characteristics during ontogenesis of leaves.7. Stomata density and sizes. Photosynthetica 16:375-471.
125. Torrecillas, A., C. Guillaume, J. J. Alarcon, and M. C. Ruizsanchez 1995. Water relations of 2 tomato species under water-stress and recovery. Plant Science 105:169-176.
126. Vallejos, C. E. 1979. Genetic diversity of plants for response to low temperatures and its potential use in crop plants. In J. M. Lyons, D. Graham, and J. K. Raison, eds. Low Temperature Stress in Crop Plants: The Role of the Membrane, pp. 565. Academic Press, New York, NY.
127. Van Deynze, A., K. Stoffel, C. R. Buell, A. Kozik, J. Liu, E. Van Der Knaap, and D. Francis 2007. Diversity in conserved genes in tomato. BMC Genomics 8:465.
128. Vasemägi, A., and C. R. Primmer 2005. Challenges for identifying functionally important genetic variation: the promise of combining complementary research strategies. Molecular Ecology 14:3623-3642.
129. Weinig, C., and J. Schmitt 2004. Environmental effects on the expression of quantitative trait loci and implications for phenotypic evolution. BioScience 54:627-635.
130. Westerbergh, A., and J. Doebley 2002. Morphological traits defining species differences in wild relatives of maize are controlled by multiple quantitative trait loci. Evolution 56:273-283.
131. Wudiri, B. B., and D. W. Henderson 1985. Effects of water-stress on flowering and fruit-set in processing tomatoes. Scientia Horticulturae 27:189-198.
132. Xu, X., B. Martin, J. P. Comstock, T. J. Vision, C. G. Tauer, B. Zhao, R. C. Pausch et al. 2008. Fine mapping a QTL for carbon isotope composition in tomato. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 117:221-233.
133. Yoo, C. Y., H. E. Pence, P. M. Hasegawa, and M. V. Mickelbart 2009. Regulation of transpiration to improve crop water use. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 28:410-431.
134. Young, K. R., C. U. Ulloa, J. L. Luteyn, and S. Knapp 2002. Plant evolution and endemism in Andean South America: an introduction. Botanical Review 68:4-21.
135. Zamir, D. 2001. Improving plant breeding with exotic genetic libraries. Nature Reviews Genetics 2:983-989.