Improving plant breeding with exotic genetic libraries

Nature Reviews Genetics

Volumn 2, Issue 12, 2001, Pages 983-989

  Zamir, Dani ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREEDING; CROP; GENE LIBRARY; GENETICS; GENOME;

BREEDING; CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; GENOME, PLANT; GENOMIC LIBRARY;

EID: 85047681400     PISSN: 14710056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/35103590     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Khush, G. S. Green Revolution: the way forward. Nature Rev. Genet. 2, 815-822 (2001).
2. Peng, J. et al. 'Green Revolution' genes encode mutant gibberellin response modulators. Nature 400, 256-261 (1999).
3. Lev-Yadun, S., Gopher, A. & Abbo, S. Archaeology. The cradle of agriculture. Science 288, 1602-1603 (2000).
4. Ladizinsky, G. Plant Evolution under Domestication (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1998).
5. Jarret, R. L. & Newman, M. Phylogenetic relationships among species of Citrullus and the placement of C. rehmii De Winter as determined by internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequence heterogeneity. Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 47, 215-222 (2000).
6. Koornneef, M. & Stam, P. Changing paradigms in plant breeding. Plant Physiol. 125, 156-159 (2001).
7. Bessey, C. E. Crop improvement by utilizing wild species. Am. Breed. Assoc. 11, 112-118 (1906).
8. Fedak, G. Molecular aids for integration of alien chromatin through wide crosses. Genome 42, 584-591 (1999).
9. Villareal, R. L., Del Toro, E., Mujeeb-Kazi, A. & Rajaram, S. The 1BL/1RS chromosome translocation effect on yield characteristics in a Triticum aestivum L. cross. Plant Breed. 114, 497-500 (1995).
10. Hoisington, D. et al. Plant genetic resources: what can they contribute toward increased crop productivity? Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 5937-5943 (1999).
11. Kovacs, M. I. P., Howes, N. K., Clarke, J. M. & Leisle, D. Quality characteristics of durum wheat lines deriving high protein from Triticum dicoccoides (6b) substitution. J. Cereal Sci. 27, 47-51 (1998).
12. Pan, Q. et al. Comparative genetics of nucleotide binding site-leucine rich repeat resistance gene homologues in the genomes of two dicotyledons: tomato and Arabidopsis. Genetics 155, 309-322 (2000).
13. Rick, C. M. High soluble-solids content in large-fruited tomato lines derived from a wild green-fruited species. Hilgardia 42, 493-510 (1974).
14. Ronen, G., Carmel-Goren, L., Zamir, D. & Hirschberg, J. An alternative pathway to β-carotene formation in plant chromoplasts discovered by map-based cloning of β- and old-gold color mutations in tomato. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 11102-11107 (2000).
15. Plunknett, D. L., Smith, N. J. H., Williams, J. T. & Murthi-Anishetty, N. Gene Banks and the World's Food (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1987).
16. Brar, D. S. & Khush, G. S. Alien introgression in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 35, 35-47 (1997).
17. Moncada, P. et al. Quantitative trait loci for yield and yield components in an Oryza sativa x O. rufipogon BC2F2 population evaluated in an upland environment. Theor. Appl. Genet. 102, 41-52 (2001).
18. Yano, M. Genetic and molecular dissection of naturally occurring variation. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 4, 130-135 (2001).
19. Singh, R. J. & Hymowitz, T. Soybean genetic resources and crop improvement. Genome 42, 605-616 (1999).
20. Sebolt, A. M., Shoemaker, R. C. & Diers, B. W. Analysis of a quantitative trait locus allele from wild soybean that increases seed protein concentration in soybean. Crop Sci. 40, 1438-1444 (2000).
21. Small, R. L., Ryburn, J. A. & Wendel, J. F. Low levels of nucleotide diversity at homoeologous Adh loci in allotetraploid cotton (Gossypium L.). Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 491-501 (1999).
22. Iqbal, M. J., Reddy, O. U. K., El-Zik, K. M. & Pepper, A. E. A genetic bottleneck in the 'evolution under domestication' of upland cotton Gossypium hirsutum L. examined using DNA fingerprinting. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103, 547-554 (2001).
23. McCarty, J. C. & Percy, R. G. in Genetic Improvement of Cotton: Emerging Technologies (eds Jenkins, J. N. & Saha, S.) 65-79 (USDA - Agricultural Research Service: Science, Enfield, New Hampshire, 2001).
24. 2 populations. Genetics 134, 559-570 (1993).
25. Wang, R. L., Stec, A., Hey, J., Lukens, L. & Doebley, J. The limits of selection during maize domestication. Nature 398, 236-239 (1999).
26. Mauricio, R. Mapping quantitative trait loci in plants: uses and caveats for evolutionary biology. Nature Rev. Genet. 2, 370-381 (2001).
27. Ray, J. D., Kindiger, B. & Sinclair, T. R. Introgressing root aerenchyma into maize. Maydica 44, 113-117 (1999).
28. Tanksley, S. D. & McCouch, S. R. Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277, 1063-1066 (1997).
29. Lee, M. Genome projects and gene pools: new germplasm for plant breeding? Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 2001-2004 (1998).
30. Fulton, T. M. et al. Advanced backcross QTL analysis of a Lycopersicon esculentum x L. parviflorum cross. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100, 1025-1042 (2000).
31. Eshed, Y. & Zamir, D. Less than additive epistatic interactions of QTL in tomato. Genetics 143, 1807-1817 (1996).
32. Kuspira, J. & Unrau, J. Genetic analysis of certain characters in common wheat using all chromosome substitution lines. Can. J. Plant Sci. 37, 300-326 (1957).
33. Eshed, Y. & Zamir, D. An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTL. Genetics 141, 1147-1162 (1995).
34. Fridman, E., Pleban, T. & Zamir, D. A recombination hotspot delimits a wild-species quantitative trait locus for tomato sugar content to 484 bp within an invertase gene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 4718-4723 (2000).
35. Ramsay, L. D. et al. The construction of a substitution library of recombinant backcross lines in Brassica oleracea for the precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genome 39, 558-567 (1996).
36. Young, N. D. A cautiously optimistic vision for marker-assisted breeding. Mol. Breed. 5, 505-510 (1999).
37. Roessner, U. et al. Metabolic profiling allows comprehensive phenotyping of genetically or environmentally modified plant systems. Plant Cell 13, 11-29 (2001).
38. Gale, M. D. & Devos, K. M. Plant comparative genetics after 10 years. Science 282, 656-659 (1998).
39. Patterson, A. H. et al. Convergent domestication of cereal crops by independent mutations at corresponding genetic loci. Science 269, 1714-1717 (1995).
40. Zhong, G. Y. Genetic issues and pitfalls in transgenic plant breeding. Euphytica 118, 137-144 (2001).
41. Uzogara, S. G. The impact of genetic modification of human foods in the 21st century a review. Botechnol. Adv. 18, 179-206 (2000).
42. Mann, C. C. Crop scientists seek a new revolution. Science 283, 310-314 (1999).
43. Acdemy, N. Transgenic Plants and World Agriculture (National Academy Press, Washington DC, 2000).
44. Mitten, D. H., MacDonald, R. & Klonus, D. Regulation of foods derived from genetically engineered crops. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 10, 298-302 (1999).
45. Kuiper, H. A., Kleter, G. A., Noteborn, H. P. J. M. & Kok, E. J. Assessment of food safety issues related to genetically modified foods. Plant J. 27, 503-528 (2001).