Comparative sequencing in the genus lycopersicon: Implications for the evolution of fruit size in the domestication of cultivated tomatoes

Genetics

Volumn 162, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 365-379

  Clint Nesbitt, T ^a,b   Tanksley, Steven D ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b Mathematics Specialist Cornell University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; DOMESTICATION; EVOLUTION; FRUIT SIZE; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GERMPLASM; NONHUMAN; PLANT GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; TOMATO;

ALLELES; BASE SEQUENCE; DNA PRIMERS; DNA, PLANT; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENOTYPE; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

LYCOPERSICON; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM VAR. CERASIFORME;

EID: 0036743506     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Alpert, K. A., S. Grandillo and S. D. Tanksley, 1995 fw2.2: a major QTL controlling fruit weight is common to both red- and green-fruited tomato species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91: 994-1000.
2. Aquadro, C. F., S. F. Deese, M. M. Bland, C. H. Langley and C. C. Laurie-Ahlberg, 1986 Molecular population genetics of the alcohol dehydrogenase gene region of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 114: 1165-1190.
3. Bernatzky, R., and S. D. Tanksley, 1986 Toward a saturated linkage map in tomato based on isozymes and cDNA sequences. Genetics 112: 887-898.
4. Boerwinkle, E. S., S. Visvikis, D. Welsh, J. Steinmetz, S. M. Hanash et al., 1987 The use of measured genotype information in the analysis of quantitative phenotypes in man. II. The role of apolipoprotein E polymorphism in determining levels, variability and covariability of cholesterol, betalipoprotein and triglycerides in a sample of unrelated individuals. Am. J. Med. Genet. 27: 567-582.
5. Breto, M. P., M. J. Asins and E. A. Carbomell, 1993 Genetic variability in Lycopersicon species and their genetic relationships. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86: 113-120.
6. Bucher, P., 1990 Weight matrix descriptions of four eukaryotic RNA polymerase II promoter elements derived from 502 unrelated promoters, J. Mol. Biol. 212: 563-578.
7. Clement, M., D. Posada and K. A. Crandall, 2000 TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol. Ecol. 9: 1657-1659.
8. Doebley, J., A. Stec and L. Hubbard, 1997 The evolution of apical dominance in maize. Nature 386: 485-488.
9. Ewing, B., and P. Green, 1998 Basecalling of automated sequencer traces using phred. Il. Error probabilities. Genome Res. 8: 186-194.
10. Ewing, B., L. Hillier, M. Wendl and P. Green, 1998 Basecalling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res. 8: 175-185.
11. Frary, A., T. C. Nesbitt, A. Frary, S. Grandillo, E. van der Knaap et al., 2000 fw2.2: a quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science 289: 85-88.
12. Fulton, T. M., J. Chunwongse and S. D. Tanksley, 1995 Microprep protocol for extraction of DNA from tomato and other herbaceous plants. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 13 (3): 207-209.
13. Gaut, B. S., 1998 Molecular clocks and nucleotide substitution rates in plants. Evol. Biol. 30: 93-120.
14. Gordon, D., C. Abajian and P. Green, 1998 Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res. 8: 195-202.
15. Grandillo, S., H. M. Ku and S. D. Tanksley, 1999 Identifying the loci responsible for natural variation in fruit size and shape in tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99: 978-987.
16. Hudson, R., M. Kreitman and M. Aguadé, 1987 A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data. Genetics 116: 153-159.
17. Jenkins, J. A., 1948 The origin of the cultivated tomato. Econ. Bot. 2: 379-392.
18. Kimura, M., 1980 A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16: 111-120.
19. Ku, H. M., T. Vision, J. Liu and S. D. Tanksley, 2000 Comparing sequenced segments of the tomato and Arabidopsis genomes: large-scale duplication followed by selective gene loss creates a network of synteny. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 9121-9126.
20. Longhurst, T., E. Lee, R. Hinde, C. Brady and J. Speirs, 1994 Structure of the Adh2 gene and Adh2 pseudogenes, and a study of the Adh2 gene expression in fruit. Plant Mol. Biol. 26: 1073-1084.
21. McClean, P. E., and M. R. Hanson, 1986 Mitochondrial DNA sequence divergence among Lycopersicon and related Solanum species. Genetics 112: 649-667.
22. McDonald, J. H., and M. Kreitman, 1991 Adaptive protein evolution at the adh locus in Drosophila. Nature 351: 652-654.
23. Milanesi, L., M. Muselli and P. Arrigo, 1996 Hamming clustering method for signal prediction in 5′ and 3′ regions of eukaryotic genes. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 12 (5): 399-404.
24. Miller, J. C., and S. D. Tanksley, 1990 RFLP analysis of phylogenetic relationships and genetic variation in the genus Lycopersicon. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80: 437-448.
25. Muse, S. V., 2000 Examining rates and patterns of nucleotide substitution in plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 42: 25-43.
26. Neter, J., W. Wasserman and M. K. Kutner, 1985 Applied Linear Statistical Models: Regression, Analysis of Variance, and Experimental Designs, Ed. 2. Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL.
27. Palmer, J. D., and D. Zamir, 1982 Chloroplast DNA evolution and phylogenetic relationships in Lycopersicon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79: 5006-5010.
28. Paterson, A. H., S. Damon, J. D. Hewitt, D. Zamir, H. D. Rabinovich et al., 1991 Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato: comparisons across species, generations, and environments. Genetics 127: 181-197.
29. Prestridge, D. S., 1995 Predicting Pol II promoter sequences using transcription factor binding sites. J. Mol. Biol. 249: 923-932.
30. Proutsky, V., and E. C. Holmes, 1998 SWAN: sliding window analysis of nucleotide sequence variability. Bioinformatics 14: 467-468.
31. Rick, C. M., 1950 Pollination relations of Lycopersicon esculentum in native and foreign regions. Evolution 4: 110-122.
32. Rick, C. M., 1958 The role of natural hybridization in the derivation of cultivated tomatoes of western South America. Econ. Bot. 12: 346-367.
33. Rick, C. M., 1963 Barriers to inbreeding in Lycopersicon peruvianum. Evolution 17: 216-232.
34. Rick, C. M., 1976 Tomato, pp. 268-273 in Evolution of Crop Plants, edited by N. W. Simmonds. Longman Group, London.
35. Rick, C. M., 1986 Reproductive isolation in the Lycopersicon peruvianum complex, pp. 477-495 in Solanaceae Biology and Systematics, edited by W. G. DARCY. Columbia University Press, New York.
36. Rick, C. M., and J. F. Fobes, 1975 Allozyme variation in the cultivated tomato and closely related species. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 102: 376-386.
37. Rick, C. M., and M. Holle, 1990 Andean Lycopersicon esculentum var. cerasiforme: genetic variation and its evolutionary significance. Econ. Bot. 44: 69-78.
38. Rick, C. M., R. W. Zobel and J. F. Fobes, 1974 Four peroxidase loci in red-fruited tomato species: genetics and geographic distribution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 71: 835-836.
39. Rozas, J., and R. Rozas, 1999 DnaSP version 3: an integrated program for molecular population genetics and molecular evolution analysis. Bioinformatics 15: 174-175.
40. Swofford, D. L., 1998 PAUP* 4.0: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
41. Tajima, F., 1993 Simple methods for testing the molecular evolutionary clock hypothesis. Genetics 135: 599-607.
42. Templeton, A. R., E. Boerwinkle and C. F. Sing, 1987 A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping. I. Basic theory and an analysis of alcohol dehydrogenase activity in Drosophila. Genetics 117: 343-351.
43. Templeton, A. R., K. A. Crandall and C. F. Sing, 1992 A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 132: 619-633.
44. Wang, R. L., A. Stec, J. Hey, L. Lukens and J. Doebley, 1999 The limits of selection during maize domestication. Nature 398: 236-239.
45. Wenke, R. J., 1990 Patterns in Prehistory: Humankind's First Three Million Years. Oxford University Press, New York.
46. Wikstrom, N., V. Savolainen and M. W. Chase, 2001 Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 1482: 2211-2220.
47. Williams, C. E., and D. A. St. Clair, 1993 Phenetic relationships and levels of variability detected by restriction fragment length polymorphism and random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of cultivated and wild accessions of Lycopersicon esculentum. Genome 36: 619-630.