Integrating GIS-based environmental data into evolutionary biology

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 141-148

  Kozak, Kenneth H ^a   Graham, Catherine H ^b   Wiens, John J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIVERGENCE; ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GIS; INTEGRATED APPROACH; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ANIMAL; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM; GEOGRAPHY; PHYLOGENY; REVIEW; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; GEOGRAPHY; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 40049098103     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.02.001     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. Avise J.C. Phylogeography: The History and Formation of Species (2000), Harvard University Press
2. Ritchie M.G., et al. Mitochondrial DNA variation and GIS analysis confirm a secondary origin of geographical variation in the bushcricket Ephippiger ephippiger (Orthoptera: Tettigonioidea), and resurrect two subspecies. Mol. Ecol. 10 (2001) 603-611
3. Rissler, L.J. and Apodaca, J.J. Adding more ecology into species delimitation: ecological niche models and phylogeography help define cryptic species in the black salamander (Aneides flavipunctatus). Syst. Biol. 56, 924-942
4. Kozak K.H., and Wiens J.J. Does niche conservatism promote speciation? A case study in North American salamanders. Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution 60 (2006) 2604-2621
5. Manel S., et al. Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18 (2003) 189-197
6. Storfer A., et al. Putting the 'landscape' in landscape genetics. Heredity 98 (2007) 128-142
7. Funk W.C., et al. Population structure of Columbia spotted frogs (Rana luteiventris) is strongly affected by the landscape. Mol. Ecol. 14 (2005) 483-496
8. Spear S.F., et al. Landscape genetics of the blotched tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum melanostictum). Mol. Ecol. 14 (2005) 2553-2564
9. Vignieri S.N. Streams over mountains: influence of riparian connectivity on gene flow in the Pacific jumping mouse (Zapus trinotatus). Mol. Ecol. 14 (2005) 1925-1937
10. Piertney S.B., et al. Local genetic structure in red grouse (Lagopus lagopus scoticus): evidence from microsatellite DNA markers. Mol. Ecol. 7 (1998) 1645-1654
11. Kozak K.H., et al. Gene lineages and eastern North American palaeodrainage basins: phylogeography and speciation in salamanders of the Eurycea bislineata species complex. Mol. Ecol. 15 (2006) 191-207
12. Guillot G., et al. Geneland: a computer package for landscape genetics. Mol. Ecol. Notes 5 (2005) 712-715
13. Ray N. PATHMATRIX: a geographical information system tool to compute effective distances among samples. Mol. Ecol. Notes 5 (2005) 177-180
14. Drielsma M., et al. The spatial links tool: automated mapping of habitat linkages in variegated landscapes. Ecol. Model. 200 (2007) 403-411
15. Hugall A., et al. Reconciling paleodistribution models and comparative phylogeography in the Wet Tropics rainforest land snail Gnarosophia bellendenkerensis (Brazier 1875). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 (2002) 6112-6117
16. Peterson A.T., et al. Reconstructing the Pleistocene geography of Aphelocoma jays. Divers. Distrib. 10 (2004) 237-246
17. Bonaccorso E., et al. Pleistocene fragmentation of Amazon species' ranges. Divers. Distrib. 12 (2006) 157-164
18. Graham C.H., et al. Habitat history improves prediction of biodiversity in a rainforest fauna. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103 (2006) 632-636
19. Waltari E., et al. Locating Pleistocene refugia: comparing phylogeographic and ecological niche model predictions. PLoS ONE 2 (2007) e563
20. Knowles L.L., et al. Coupling genetic and ecological-niche models to examine how past population distributions contribute to divergence. Curr. Biol. 17 (2007) 940-946
21. Carstens B.C., and Richards C.L. Integrating coalescent and ecological niche modeling in comparative phylogeography. Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution 6 (2007) 1439-1454
22. Martínez-Meyer E., et al. Ecological niches as stable distributional constraints on mammal species, with implications for Pleistocene extinction and climate change projections for biodiversity. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 13 (2004) 1013-1044
23. Martínez-Meyer E., and Peterson A.T. Conservatism of ecological niche characteristics in North American plant species over the Pleistocene-to-Recent transition. J. Biogeogr. 33 (2006) 1779-1789
24. Coyne J.A., and Orr H.A. Speciation (2004), Sinauer Associates
25. Peterson A.T., et al. Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time. Science 285 (1999) 1265-1267
26. Wiens J.J. Speciation and ecology revisited: phylogenetic niche conservatism and the origin of species. Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution 58 (2004) 193-197
27. Gavrilets S. Perspective: Models of speciation: what have we learned in 40 years?. Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution 57 (2003) 2197-2215
28. Funk D.J., et al. Ecological divergence exhibits consistently positive associations with reproductive isolation across disparate taxa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103 (2006) 3209-3213
29. Graham C.H., et al. Integrating phylogenetics and environmental niche models to explore speciation mechanisms in dendrobatid frogs. Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution 58 (2004) 1781-1793
30. Kozak K.H., and Wiens J.J. Climatic zonation drives latitudinal variation in speciation mechanisms. Proc. Biol. Sci. 274 (2007) 2995-3003
31. Barraclough T.G., and Vogler A.P. Detecting the geographical pattern of speciation from species-level phylogenies. Am. Nat. 155 (2000) 419-434
32. Losos J.B., and Glor R.E. Phylogenetic comparative methods and the geography of speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18 (2003) 220-227
33. Ruegg K.C., et al. Climate change and the origin of migratory pathways in the Swainson's thrush, Catharus ustulatus. J. Biogeogr. 33 (2006) 1172-1182
34. Prinzing A., et al. The niche of higher plants: evidence for phylogenetic niche conservatism. Proc. Biol. Sci. 268 (2001) 2383-2389
35. Ackerly D.D. Adaptation, niche conservatism, and convergence: comparative studies of leaf evolution in the California chaparral. Am. Nat. 163 (2004) 654-671
36. Wiens J.J., et al. Evolutionary and ecological causes of the latitudinal diversity gradient in hylid frogs: treefrog trees unearth the roots of high tropical diversity. Am. Nat. 168 (2006) 579-596
37. Smith S.A., et al. Replicate patterns of species richness, historical biogeography, and phylogeny in Holarctic treefrogs. Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution 59 (2005) 2433-2450
38. Rice N.H., et al. Ecological niche differentiation in the Aphelocoma jays: a phylogenetic perspective. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 80 (2003) 369-383
39. Knouft J.H., et al. Phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of the niche in lizards of the Anolis sagrei group. Ecology 87 (2006) S29-S38
40. Peterson A.T., and Holt R.D. Niche differentiation in Mexican birds: using point occurrences to detect ecological innovation. Ecol. Lett. 6 (2003) 774-782
41. Rosenberg, M.S. (2001) Pattern analysis, spatial statistics, and geographic exegesis. Version 1.0. Department of Biology, Arizona State University. http://www.passagesoftware.net
42. Pagel, M. and Meade, A. (2007) BayesTraits. School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading. http://evolution.reading.ac.uk/SoftwareMain.html
43. Stockman A.K., et al. D-NOVL: a program to simulate overlap between two niche-based distribution models. Mol. Ecol. Notes 8 (2008) 290-294
44. Swenson N.G. GIS-based niche models reveal unifying climatic mechanisms that maintain the location of avian hybrid zones in a North American suture zone. J. Evol. Biol. 19 (2006) 717-725
45. Cicero C. Barriers to sympatry between avian sibling species (Paridae: Baeolophus) in local secondary contact. Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution 58 (2004) 1573-1587
46. Stockman A.K., and Bond J.E. Delimiting cohesion species: extreme population structuring and the role of ecological interchangeability. Mol. Ecol. 16 (2007) 3374-3392
47. Ruegg K., et al. Divergence in mating signals correlates with ecological variation in the migratory songbird, Swainson's thrush (Catharus ustulatus). Mol. Ecol. 15 (2006) 3147-3156
48. Wiens J.J., et al. Loss and re-evolution of complex life cycles in marsupial frogs: can ancestral reconstruction mislead?. Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution 61 (2007) 1886-1899
49. Peterson A.T. Predicting the geography of species' invasions via ecological niche modeling. Q. Rev. Biol. 79 (2003) 419-433
50. Broennimann O., et al. Evidence of climatic niche shift during biological invasion. Ecol. Lett. 10 (2007) 701-709
51. Miller A.J., and Knouft J.H. GIS-based characterization of the geographic distributions of wild and cultivated populations of the Mesoamerican fruit tree Spondias purpurea. Am. J. Bot. 93 (2006) 1757-1767
52. Joost S., et al. A spatial analysis method (SAM) to detect candidate loci for selection: towards a landscape genomics approach to adaptation. Mol. Ecol. 16 (2007) 3955-3969
53. Peterson A.T., et al. Future projections for Mexican faunas under global climate change scenarios. Nature 416 (2002) 626-629
54. Williams S.E., et al. Climate change in Australian tropical rainforests: an impending environmental catastrophe. Proc. Biol. Sci. 270 (2003) 1887-1892
55. Thomas C.D., et al. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427 (2004) 145-148
56. Turner W., et al. Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18 (2003) 306-314
57. Hutchinson M.F. A new objective method for spatial interpolation of meteorological variables from irregular networks applied to the estimation of monthly mean solar radiation, temperature, precipitation and windrun. CSIRO Division of Water Resources Tech. Memo 89 (1989) 95-104
58. Hijmans R.J., et al. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25 (2005) 1965-1978
59. Nix, H.A. (1986) A biogeographic analysis of Australian elapid snakes. In Atlas of Elapid Snakes of Australia (Australian Flora and Fauna Series Number 7) (Longmore, R., ed.), pp. 4-15, Australian Government Publishing Service
60. Graham C.H., et al. New developments in museum-based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19 (2004) 497-503
61. Guisan A., and Zimmermann N.E. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol. Model 135 (2000) 147-186
62. Guisan A., and Thuiller W. Predicting species distributions: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol. Lett. 8 (2005) 993-1009
63. Stockwell D., and Peters D. The GARP modeling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 13 (1999) 143-158
64. Phillips S.J., et al. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model. 190 (2006) 231-259
65. Elith J., et al. Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29 (2006) 129-151
66. Anderson R.P., et al. Using niche-based GIS modeling to test geographic predictions of competitive exclusion and competitive release in South American pocket mice. Oikos 98 (2002) 3-16
67. Svenning J.C., et al. Range filling in European trees. J. Biogeogr. 33 (2006) 2018-2021
68. Raxworthy C.J., et al. Predicting distributions of known and unknown reptile species in Madagascar. Nature 426 (2003) 837-841
69. Araujo M.B., and Guisan A. Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modeling. J. Biogeogr. 33 (2006) 1677-1688
70. Sóberon J., and Peterson A.T. Interpretations of models of fundamental ecological niches and species' distributional areas. Biodiv. Inform. 2 (2005) 1-10
71. Pearson R.G., and Dawson T.P. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distributions of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful?. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 5 (2003) 361-371
72. Kearney M., and Porter W.P. Mapping the fundamental niche: physiology, climate, and the distribution of a nocturnal lizard. Ecology 85 (2004) 3119-3131
73. Wright J.W., et al. Experimental verification of ecological niche modeling in a heterogeneous environment. Ecology 87 (2006) 2433-2439
74. Anderson R.P., et al. Geographical distributions of spiny pocket mice in South America: insights from predictive models. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 11 (2002) 131-141
75. Kidd D.M., and Ritchie M.G. Phylogeographic information systems: putting the geography into phylogeography. J. Biogeogr. 33 (2006) 1851-1865
76. Hijmans R.J., and Graham C.H. The ability of climate envelopes to predict the effect of climate change on species distributions. Glob. Change Biol. 12 (2006) 2272-2281
77. Heikkinen R.K., et al. Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modeling under climate change. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 30 (2006) 751-777
78. Araujo M.B., and New M. Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22 (2007) 42-47
79. Richards C.L., and Knowles L.L. Tests of phenotypic and genetic concordance and their application to the conservation of Panamanian golden frogs (Anura, Bufonidae). Mol. Ecol. 16 (2007) 3119-3133