Adaptive Evolution of the Water Stress-Induced Gene Asr2 in Lycopersicon Species Dwelling in Arid Habitats

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 20, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 1955-1962

  Frankel, Nicolás ^a   Hasson, Esteban ^b   Iusem, Norberto D ^a   Rossi, María Susana ^a  

^a INSTITUTO DE FISIOLOGÍA   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Adaptive evolution; Asr genes; Lycopersicon; Tomato; Water stress

Indexed keywords

ASR2 PROTEIN; GENE PRODUCT; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; ASR2 GENE; DESERT; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; GENE EXPRESSION; LYCOPERSICON CHEESMANII; LYCOPERSICON CHILENSE; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM CERSIFORME; LYCOPERSICON HIRSUTUM; LYCOPERSICON PERUVIANUM GLANDULOSUM; LYCOPERSICON PERUVIANUM HUMIFUSUM; MOLECULAR CLONING; NONHUMAN; NUCLEIC ACID BASE SUBSTITUTION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PLANT GENETICS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; TOMATO; WATER DEFICIT; WATER STRESS;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; BASE SEQUENCE; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; PLANT PROTEINS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

DARWINIA; EMBRYOPHYTA; LYCOPERSICON; LYCOPERSICON CHEESMANII; LYCOPERSICON CHILENSE; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; LYCOPERSICON HIRSUTUM; LYCOPERSICON PERUVIANUM VAR. HUMIFUSUM;

EID: 0346095402     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msg214     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Alba, R., P. M. Kelmenson, M. M. Cordonnier-Pratt, and L. H. Pratt. 2000. The phytochrome gene family in tomato and the rapid differential evolution of this family in Angiosperms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:362-373.
2. Atanassova, R., M. Leterrier, C. Gaillard, A. Agasse, E. Sagot, P. Coutos-Thévenot, and S. Delrot. 2003. Sugar-regulated expression of a putative hexose transport gene in grape. Plant Physiol. 131:326-334.
3. Baudry, E., C. Kerdelhué, H. Innan, and W. Stephan. 2001. Species and recombination effects on DNA variability in the tomato genus. Genetics 158:1725-1735.
4. Bishop, J. G., A. M. Dean, and T. Mitchell-Olds. 2000. Rapid evolution in plant chitinases: molecular targets of selection in plant-pathogen coevolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:5322-5327.
5. Bohnert, H. J., and E. Sheveleva. 1998. Plant stress adaptationsmaking metabolism move. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 1:267-274.
6. Boyer, J. S. 1982. Plant productivity and environment. Science 218:444-448.
7. Chen, R. D., N. Campeau, A. F. Greer, G. Bellemare, and Z. Tabaeizadeh. 1993. Sequence of a novel abscisic acid- and drought-induced cDNA from wild tomato (Lycopersicon chilense). Plant Physiol. 103:301.
8. Chen, R. D., L. X. Yu, A. F. Greer, H. Cheriti, and Z. Tabaeizadeh. 1994. Isolation of an osmotic stress- and abscisic acid-induced gene encoding an acidic endochitinase from Lycopersicon chilense. Mol. Gen. Genet. 245:195-202.
9. Elliott, K. J., W. O. Butler, C. D. Dickinson, Y. Konno, and T. S. Vedvick. 1993. Isolation and characterization of fruit vacuolar invertase genes from two tomato species and temporal differences in mRNA levels during fruit ripening. Plant Mol. Biol. 21:515-524.
10. Endo, T., K. Ikeo, and T. Gojobori. 1996. Large-scale search for genes on which positive selection may operate. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:685-690.
11. Finkelstein, R. R., S. S. Gampala, and C. D. Rock. 2002. Abscisic acid signaling in seeds and seedlings. Plant Cell 14(Suppl.):S15-45.
12. Goldman, N., and Z. Yang. 1994. A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:725-736.
13. Hall, T. A. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/ NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 41:95-98.
14. Hare, P. D., W. A. Cress, and J. Van Staden. 1998. Dissecting the roles of osmolyte accumulation during stress. Plant Cell Environ. 21:535-553.
15. Hillis, D. M., and J. P. Huelsenbeck. 1992. Signal, noise and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analysis. J. Hered. 83:189-195.
16. Hsieh, T. H., J. T. Lee, Y. Y. Charng, and M. T. Chan. 2002. Tomato plants ectopically expressing Arabidopsis CBF1 show enhanced resistance to water deficit stress. Plant Physiol. 130:618-26.
17. Hughes, A. L. 2002. Adaptive evolution after gene duplication. Trends Genet. 18:433-434.
18. Ingram, J., and D. Bartels. 1996. The molecular basis of dehydration tolerance in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 47:377-403.
19. Iusem, N. D., D. M. Bartholomew, W. D Hitz, and P. A. Scolnik. 1993. Tomato transcript induced in water stress and ripening. Plant Physiol. 102:1353-1354.
20. Kasuga M., Q. Liu, S. Miura, K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, and K. Shinozaki. 1999. Improving plant drought, salt, and freezing tolerance by gene transfer of a single stress-inducible transcription factor. Nat. Biotech. 17:287-291.
21. Kreitman, M. 2000. Methods to detect selection in populations with applications to the human. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 01:539-559.
22. Kondo, K., M. Yamamoto, D. P. Matton, T. Sato, M. Hirai, S. Norioka, T. Hattori, and Y. Kowyama. 2002. Cultivated tomato has defects in both S-RNase and HT genes required for stylar function of self-incompatibility. Plant J. 29:627-636.
23. Kumar, S., K. Tamura, I. B. Jakobsen, and M. Nei. 2001. MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software. Distributed by the authors, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz.
24. Liberles, D. A., D. R. Schreiber, S. Govindajaran, S. G. Chamberlin, and S. A. Benner. 2001. The adaptive evolution database (TAED). Genome Biol. 2:RESEARCH0028.1-0028.6.
25. Marshall, J. A., S. Knapp, M. R. Davey, J. B. Power, E. C. Cocking, M. D. Bennett, and A. V. Cox. 2001, Molecular systematics of Solanum section Lycopersicum (Lycopersicon) using the nuclear ITS rDNA region. Theor. App. Genet. 103:1216-1222.
26. Maskin, L., G. E. Gudesblat, J. E. Moreno, F. O. Carrari, N. Frankel, A. Sambade, M. Rossi, and N. D. Iusem. 2001. Differential expression of the members of the Asr gene family in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Plant Sci. 161:739-746.
27. Miller, J. C., and S. D. Tanksley. 1990. RFLP analysis of phylogenetic relationships and genetic variation in the genus Lycopersicon. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80:437-448.
28. Nei, M., and T. Gojobori. 1986. Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 3:418-426.
29. Oliver, M. J., Z. Tuba, and B. D. Mishler. 2000. Evolution of dessication tolerance in land plants. Plant Ecol. 151:85-100.
30. Peralta, I. E., and D. M. Spooner. 2001. Granule-bound starch synthase (GBSSI) gene phylogeny of wild tomatoes (Solanum L. Secton Lycopersicon [Mill.] Wettst. subsection Lycopersicon). Am. J. Bot. 88:1888-1902.
31. Prusiner, S. B. 1997. Prion diseases and the BSE crisis. Science 278:245-251.
32. Qiu, Y. L., and J. D. Palmer. 1999. Phylogeny of early land plants: insights from genes and genomes. Trends Plant Sci. 4:26-30.
33. Rossi, M. M., and N. D. Iusem. 1994. Tomato genomic clone homologous to a gene encoding an ABA-induced protein. Plant Physiol. 104:1073-1074.
34. Rick, C. M. 1973. Potential genetic resources in tomato species: clues from observations in native habitats. Pp. 255-269 in A. M. Srb, ed. Genes, enzymes, and populations. Plenum, New York.
35. -. 1979. Biosystematic studies in Lycopersicon and closely related species of Solanum. Pp. 667-677 in J. G. Hawkes, R. N. Lester, and A. D. Skelding, eds. The biology and taxonomy of Solanaceae. Linnean Society Symposium Series 7. Academic Press, New York.
36. Schneider, A., F. Salamini, and C. Gebhardt. 1997. Expression patterns and promoter activity of the cold-regulated gene ci21A of potato. Plant Physiol. 113:335-345.
37. Shinozaki, K., and K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki. 1997. Gene expression and signal transduction in water-stress response. Plant Physiol. 115:327-334.
38. Skriver, K., and J. Mundy. 1990. Gene expression in response to abscisic acid and osmotic stress. Plant Cell 2:503-512.
39. Swofford, D. L. 1998. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0 beta. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
40. Taylor, I. B. 1986. Biosystematics of the tomato. Pp. 1-34 in J. G. Atherton and J. Rudich, eds. The tomato crop: a scientific basis for improvement. Chapman and Hall, London.
41. Thompson, J. D., T. J. Gibson, F. Pleuniak, E. Janemougin, and D. G. Higgins. 1997. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 24:4876-4882.
42. Vacquier, V. D., W. J. Swanson, and Y-H. Lee. 1997. Positive Darwinian selection on two homologous fertilization proteins: What is the selective pressure driving their divergence? J. Mol. Evol. 44(Suppl. 1):S15-S22.
43. Van der Hoeven R., C. Ronning, J. Giovannoni, G. Martin, and S. Tanksley. 2002. Deductions about the number, organization, and evolution of genes in the tomato genome based on analysis of a large expressed sequence tag collection and selective genomic sequencing. Plant Cell 14:1441-1456.
44. Wallis, M. 2001. Episodic evolution of protein hormones in mammals. J. Mol. Evol. 53:10-18.
45. Wei, T., and M. A. O'Connell. 1996. Structure and characterization of a putative drought-inducible H1 histone gene. Plant Mol. Biol. 30:255-268.
46. Yang, Z. 1997. PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13:555-556.
47. -. 1998. Likelihood ratio tests for detecting positive selection and application to primate lysozyme evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:568-573.
48. Yang, Z., and P. Bielawski. 2000. Statistical methods for detecting molecular adaptation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1512:496-501.
49. Zhang, J., and M. Nei. 1997. Accuracies of ancestral amino acid sequences inferred by the parsimony, likelihood, and distance methods. J. Mol. Evol. 44(Suppl. 1):S139-S146.
50. Zhang, J., Y. Zhang, and H. F. Rosenberg. 2002. Adaptive evolution of a duplicated pancreatic ribonuclease gene in a leaf-eating monkey. Nat. Genet. 30:411-415.
51. Zhu, J.-K. 2002. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 53:247-273.