Cytogenetics and evolution

Genetic Improvement of Solanaceous Crops Volume 2: Tomato

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 77-112

  Chetelat, Roger T ^a   Ji, Yuanfu ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYTOLOGY; PLANTS (BOTANY);

CHROMOSOME PAIRING; HOMOLOGOUS CHROMOSOMES; LYCOPERSICON; POLLEN FERTILITY;

CHROMOSOMES;

EID: 85023641900     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (161)

1. Afify, A. 1933. The Cytology of the hybrid between Lycopersicon esculentum and L. racemigerum in relation to its parents. Genetica 15: 225–240.
2. Areshchenkova, T. and M.W. Ganal. 1999. Long tomato microsatellites are predominantly associated with Centromeric regions. Genome 42: 536–544.
3. Areshchenkova, T. and M.W. Ganal. 2002. Comparative analysis of polymorphism and Chromosomal location of tomato microsatellite markers isolated from different sources. Theor Appl Genet 104: 229–235.
4. Arumuganathan, K. and E.D. Earle. 1991. Nuclear DNA Content of some important plant species. Plant Mol Biol Rep 9: 208–218.
5. Balint-Kurti, P.J., D.A. Jones, and J.D.G. Jones. 1995. Integration of the Classical and RFLP linkage maps of the short arm of tomato Chromosome 1. Theor Appl Genet 90: 1726.
6. Barton, D.W. 1950. Pachytene morphology of the tomato Chromosome Complement. Am J Bot. 37: 639–643.
7. Baudry, E., C. Kerdelhue, H. Innan, and W. Stephan. 2001. Species and recombination effects on DNA variability in the tomato genus. Genetics 158: 1725–1735.
8. Bernacchi, D. and S.D. Tanksley. 1997. An interspecific backcross of Lycopersicon esculentum x L. hirsutum: linkage analysis and a QTL study of sexual Compatibility factors and floral traits. Genetics 147: 861–877.
9. Bernatzky, R. and S.D. Tanksley. 1986. Toward a saturated linkage map in tomato based on isozymes and random CDNA sequences. Genetics 112: 887–898.
10. Bonierbale, M.W., R.L. Plaisted, and S.D. Tanksley. 1988. RFLP maps based on a Common set of Clones reveal modes of Chromosomal evolution in potato and tomato. Genetics 120: 1095–1103.
11. Bonnema, G., D. Schipper, S. Van Heusden, P. Zabel, and P. Lindhout. 1997. Tomato Chromosome 1: high resolution genetic and physical mapping of the short arm in an interspecific Lycopersicon esculentum x L. peruvianum Cross. Mol Gen Genet 253: 455–462.
12. Bonnema, G., P. van den Berg, and P. Lindhout. 2002. AFLPs mark different genomic regions Compared with RFLPs: a Case study in tomato. Genome 45: 217–221.
13. Breuning, G. and J.M. Lyons. 2000. The Case of the FLAVR SAVR tomato. Calif Agric 54: 6–7.
14. Brown, S.W. 1949. The structure and meiotic behavior of the differentiated Chromosomes of tomato. Genetics 34: 437–461.
15. Burbidge, A., P. Lindhout, T.M. Grieve, K. Schumacher, K. Theres, A.W. van Heusden, A.B. Bonnema, K.J. Woodman, and I.B. Taylor. 2001. Re-orientation and integration of the Classical and interspecific linkage maps of the long arm of tomato Chromosome 7. Theor Appl Genet 103: 443–454.
16. Caicedo, A.L., and B.A. Schaal. 2004. Population structure and phylogeography of Solanum pimpinellifolium inferred from a nuclear gene. Mol Ecol 13: 1871–1882.
17. Canady, M.A., V. Meglic, and R.T. Chetelat. 2005. A library of Solanum lycopersicoides introgression lines in Cultivated tomato. Genome 48: 685–697.
18. Chetelat, R.T. 2005. Revised list of monogenic stocks. Tomato Genetics Coop. Report 55: 48–69.
19. Chetelat, R.T. and V. Meglic. 2000. Molecular mapping of Chromosome segments introgressed from Solanum lycopersicoides into Cultivated tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Theor Appl Genet 100: 232–341.
20. Chetelat, R.T., V. Meglic, and P. Cisneros. 2000. A genetic map of tomato based on BCj Lycopersicon esculentum xSolanum lycopersicoides reveals overall synteny but suppressed recombination between these homeologous genomes. Genetics 154: 857–867.
21. Chetelat, R.T. and J. Petersen. 2003. Revised list of miscellaneous stocks. Tomato Genet Coop Rep 53: 44–61.
22. Chetelat, R.T., C.M. Rick, P. Cisneros, K.B. Alpert, and J.W. DeVerna. 1998. Identification, transmission, and Cytological behavior of Solanum lycopersicoides Dun. monosomic alien addition lines in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Genome 41: 40–50.
23. Chmielewski, T. 1962. Cytogenetical and taxonomical studies of a new tomato form, Part I. Genetica Polonica 3: 253–264.
24. Cooley, M.B., A.P. Goldsbrough, D.W. Still, and J.I. Yoder. 1996. Site-selected insertional mutagenesis of tomato with maize Ac and Ds elements. Mol Gen Genet 252: 184–194.
25. de Vicente, M.C. and S.D. Tanksley. 1991. Genome-wide reduction in recombination of backcross progeny derived from male versus female gametes in an interspecific backcross of tomato. Theor Appl Genet 83: 173–178.
26. de Vicente, M.C. and S.D. Tanksley. 1993. QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interspecific tomato Cross. Genetics 134: 585–596.
27. DeVerna, J.W. and A.H. Paterson. 1991. Genetics of Lycopersicon. In: G. Kaltoo [ed.], Genetic Improvement of Tomato. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 21–38.
28. DeVerna, J.W., C.M. Rick, R.T. Chetelat, B.J. Lanini, and K.B. Alpert. 1990. Sexual hybridization of Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum rickii by means of a sesquidiploid bridging hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA) 87: 9496–9490.
29. Doganlar, S., A. Frary, M.C. Daunay, R.N. Lester, and S.D. Tanksley. 2002. A Comparative genetic linkage map of eggplant (Solanum melongena) and its implications for genome evolution in the Solanaceae. Genetics 161: 1697–1711.
30. Doganlar, S., A. Frary, H-M. Ku, and S.D. Tanksley. 2002. Mapping quantitative trait loci in inbred backcross lines of Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium (LA1589). Genome 45: 1189–1202.
31. Escalante, A., S. Imanishi, M. Hossain, N. Ohmido, and K. Fukui. 1998. RFLP analysis and genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) in somatic hybrids and their progeny between Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum lycopersicoides. Theor Appl Genet 96: 719–726.
32. Eshed, Y. and D. Zamir. 1995. An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the Cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTL. Genetics 141: 1147–1162.
33. Evans, D.A. and W.R. Sharp. 1983. Single gene mutations in tomato plants regenerated from tissue Culture. Science 221: 949–951.
34. Fillatti, J.J., J. Kiser, R. Rose, and L. Comai. 1987. Efficient transfer of a glyphosate tolerance gene into tomato using a binary Agrobacterium tumefaciens vector. Bio/Technology 5: 726–730.
35. Fransz, P.F., C. Alonso-Blanco, T.B. Liharska, A.J.M. Peeters, P. Zabel, and J. Hans De Jong. 1996. High-resolution physical mapping in Arabidopsis thaliana and tomato by fluorescence in situ hybridization to extended DNA fibres. Plant J 9: 421–430.
36. Frary, A., G.G. Presting, and S.D. Tanksley. 1996. Molecular mapping of the Centromeres of tomato Chromosomes 7 and 9. Mol Gen Genet 250: 295–304.
37. Frary, A., Y. Xu, J. Liu, S. Mitchell, E. Tedeschi, and S. Tanksley. 2005. Development of a set of PCR-based anchor markers encompassing the tomato genome and evaluation of their usefulness for genetics and breeding experiments. Theor Appl Genet III: 291–312.
38. Fridman, E., T. Pleban, and D. Zamir. 2000. A recombination hotspot delimits a wild- species quantitative trait locus for tomato sugar Content to 484 bp within an invertase gene. Proc Nat Acad Sci (USA) 97: 4718–4723.
39. Fuchs, J., D.U. Kloos, M.W. Ganal, and I. Schubert. 1996. In situ localization of yeast artificial Chromosome sequences on tomato and potato metaphase Chromosomes. Chrom Res 4: 277–281.
40. Fulton, T., R. Van Der Hoeven, N. Eannetta, and S. Tanksley. 2002. Identification, analysis and utilization of Conserved ortholog set (COS) markers for Comparative genomics in higher plants. Plant Cell 14: 1457–1467.
41. Fulton, T.M., S. Grandillo, T. Beck-Bunn, E. Fridman, A. Frampton, J. Lopez, V. Petiard, J. Uhlig, D. Zamir, and S.D. Tanksley. 2000. Advanced backcross QTL analysis of a Lycopersicon esculentum x Lycopersicon parviflorum Cross. Theor Appl Genet 100: 1025–1042.
42. Fulton, T.M., J.C. Nelson, and S.D. Tanksley. 1997. Introgression and DNA marker analysis of Lycopersicon peruvianum, a wild relative of the Cultivated tomato, into Lycopersicon esculentum, followed through three successive backcross generations. Theor Appl Genet 95: 895–902.
43. Ganal, M.W., N.L.V. Lapitan, and S.D. Tanksley. 1988. A molecular and Cytogenetic survey of major repeated DNA sequences in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Molec Gen Genet 213: 262–268.
44. Ganal, M.W., N.L.V. Lapitan, and S.D. Tanksley. 1991. Macrostructure of the tomato telomeres. Plant Cell 3: 87–94.
45. Ganal, M.W. and S.D. Tanksley. 1996. Recombination around the Tm2a and Mi resistance genes in different Crosses of Lycopersicon peruvianum. Theor Appl Genet 92: 101–108.
46. Ganal, M.W., N.D. Young, and S.D. Tanksley. 1989. Pulsed field gel electrophoresis and physical mapping of large DNA fragments in the Tm-2a region of Chromosome 9. Mol Gen Genet 215: 395–400.
47. Garriga-Caldere, F., D.J. Huigen, A. Angrisano, E. Jacobsen, and M.S. Ramanna. 1998. Transmission of alien tomato Chromosomes from BC1 to BC2 progenies derived from backcrossing potato(+)tomato fusion hybrids to potato: the selection of single additions for seven different Chromosomes. Theor Appl Genet 96: 155–163.
48. Garriga-Caldere, F., D.J. Huigen, E. Jacobsen, and M.S. Ramanna. 1999. Prospects for introgressing tomato Chromosomes into the potato genome: an assessment through GISH analysis. Genome 42: 282–288.
49. Garriga-Caldere, F., D.J.F.F. Huigen, E. Jacobsen, and M.S. Ramanna. 1997. Identification of alien Chromosomes through GISH and RFLP analysis and the potential for establishing potato lines with monosomic additions of tomato Chromosomes. Genome 40: 666–673.
50. Gavazzi, G., C. Tonelli, G. Todesco, E. Arreghini, F. Raffaldi, F. Vecchio, G. Barbuzzi, M.G. Biasini, and F. Sala. 1987. Somaclonal variation versus Chemically induced mutagenesis in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). Theor Appl Genet 74: 733–738.
51. Gavrilenko, T., R. Thieme, and V.M. Rokka. 2001. Cytogenetic analysis of Lycopersicon esculentum (+) Solanum etuberosum somatic hybrids and their androgenetic regenerants. Theor Appl Genet 103: 231–239.
52. Gill, B.S. 1983. Tomato Cytogenetics - a search for new frontiers, In: M.S. Swaminathan, P.K. Gupta and U. Sinha [eds.], Cytogenetics of Crop Plants. Macmillan India, India, pp. 456–480.
53. Gorman, S.W., D. Banasiak, C. Fairley, and S. McCormick. 1996. A 610 kb YAC Clone harbors 7 CM of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) DNA that includes the male sterile 14 gene and a hotspot for recombination. Mol Gen Genet 251: 52–59.
54. Grandillo, S. and S.D. Tanksley. 1996. Genetic analysis of RFLPs, GATA microsatellites and RAPDs in a Cross between L esculentum and L pimpinellifolium. Theor Appl Genet 92: 957–965.
55. Haanstra, J.P.W., C. Wye, H. Verbakel, F. Meijer-Dekens, P. Van Den Berg, P. Odinot, A.W. Van Heusden, S. Tanksley, P. Lindhout, and J. Peleman. 1999. An integrated high- density RFLP-AFLP map of tomato based on two Lycopersicon esculentum x L. pennellii F2 populations. Theor Appl Genet 99: 254–271.
56. Haider Ali, S.N., M.S. Ramanna, E. Jacobsen, and R.G.F. Visser. 2001. Establishment of a Complete series of a monosomic tomato Chromosome addition lines in the Cultivated potato using RFLP and GISH analysis. Theor Appl Genet 103: 687–695.
57. Haider Ali, S.N., M.S. Ramanna, E. Jacobsen, and R.G.F. Visser. 2002. Genome differentiation between Lycopersicon esculentum and L. pennellii as revealed by genomic in situ hybridization. Euphytica 127: 227–234.
58. Handley, L.W., R.L. Nickels, M.W. Cameron, P.P. Moore, and K.C. Sink. 1986. Somatic hybrid plants between Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum lycopersicoides. Theor Appl Genet 71: 691–697.
59. Hossain, M., S. Imanishi, and A. Matsumoto. 1994. Production of somatic hybrids between tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and nightshade (Solanum lycopersicoides) by electrofusion. Breeding Sci 44: 405–412.
60. Jacobsen, E., M.K. Daniel, J.E.M. Bergervoet-van Deelen, D.J. Huigen, and M.S. Ramanna. 1994. The first and second backcross progeny of the intergeneric fusion hybrids of potato and tomato after Crossing with potato. Theor Appl Genet 88: 181–186.
61. Jacobsen, E., J.H. de Jong, S.A. Kamstra, P.M.M.M. van den Berg, and M.S. Ramanna. 1995. Genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) and RFLP analysis for the identification of alien Chromosomes in the backcross progeny of potato (+) tomato fusion hybrids. Heredity 74: 250–257.
62. Ji, Y. and R.T. Chetelat. 2003. Homeologous pairing and recombination in Solanum lycopersicoides monosomic addition and substitution lines of tomato. Theor Appl Genet 106: 979–989.
63. Ji, Y., R.A. Pertuze, and R.T. Chetelat. 2004. Genome differentiation by GISH in interspecific and intergeneric hybrids of tomato and related nightshades. Chromosome Res 12: 107–116.
64. Kaloshian, I., J. Yaghoobi, T. Liharska, J. Hontelez, D. Hanson, P. Hogan, T. Jesse, J. Wijbrandi, G. Simons, P. Vos, P. Zabel, and V.M. Williamson. 1998. Genetic and physical localization of the root-knot nematode resistance locus Mi in tomato. Mol Gen Genet 257: 376–385.
65. Khush, G.S. 1963. Identification key for pachytene Chromosomes of esculentum. Tomato Genet Coop Rep 13: 12–13.
66. Khush, G.S. 1973. Cytogenetics of aneuploids. Academic Press, New York, USA.
67. Khush, G.S. and C.M. Rick. 1963. Meiosis in hybrids between Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum pennellii. Genetica 33: 167–183.
68. Khush, G.S. and C.M. Rick. 1966. The origin, identification, and Cytogenetic behavior of tomato monosomics. Chromosoma 18: 407–420.
69. Khush, G.S. and C.M. Rick. 1968. Cytogenetic analysis of the tomato genome by means of induced deficiencies. Chromosoma 23: 452–484.
70. Knapp, S., Y. Larondelle, M. Rossberg, D. Furtek, and K. Theres. 1994. Transgenic tomato lines Containing Ds elements at defined genomic positions as tools for targeted transposon tagging. Mol Gen Genet 243: 666–673.
71. Koornneef, M., J. Bade, C. Hanhart, K. Horsman, J. Schel, W. Soppe, R. Verkerk, and P. Zabel. 1993. Characterization and mapping of a gene Controlling shoot regeneration in tomato. Plant J 3: 131–141.
72. Ku, H.-M., J. Liu, S. Doganlar, and S.D. Tanksley. 2001. Exploitation of Arabidopsis-tomato synteny to Construct a high-resolution map of the ovate-containing region in tomato Chromosome 2. Genome 44: 470–475.
73. Ku, H.-M., T. Vision, J. Liu, and S.D. Tanksley. 2000. Comparing sequenced segments of the tomato and arabidopsis genomes: large-scale duplication followed by selective gene loss Creates a network of synteny. Proc Nat Acad Sci (USA) 97: 9121–9126.
74. Lapitan, N.L.V., M.W. Ganal, and S.D. Tanksley. 1989. Somatic Chromosome karyotype of tomato based on in situ hybridization of the TGRI satellite repeat. Genome 32: 992–998.
75. Lesley, M.M. 1950. A Cytological basis for sterility in tomato hybrids: evidence for an inversion in one Chromosome of the F1 between Lycopersicon esculentum var. Pearson and L. peruvianum P.I. 126946. J Hered 26–28.
76. Lesley, M.M. and J.W. Lesley. 1935. Heteromorphic A Chromosomes of the tomato differing in satellite size. Genetics 23: 485–493.
77. Lesley, M.M. and J.W. Lesley. 1943. Hybrids of the Chilean tomato: sterile and fertile plants of Lycopersicon peruvianum var. dentatum Dun. (L. Chilense Dun.) and diploid and tetraploid hybrids with Cultivated tomatoes. J Hered 34: 199–205.
78. Livingstone, K.D., V.K. Lackney, J.R. Blauth, R.I.K. Van Wijk, and M. Kyle Jahn. 1999. Genome mapping in Capsicum and the evolution of genome structure in the Solanaceae. Genetics 152: 1183–1202.
79. Matsubayashi, M. 1991. Phylogenetic relationships in potato and its related species. In: T. Tsuchiya and P.K. Gupta [eds], Chromosome Engineering in Plants: Genetics, Breeding, Evolution, Part B. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, pp. 93–118.
80. Matsumoto, A., S. Imanishi, M. Hossain, A. Escalante, and H. Egashira. 1997. Fertile somatic hybrids between F1 (Lycopersicon esculentum x L. peruvianum var. humifusum) and Solanum lycopersicoides. Breeding Sci 47: 327–333.
81. McCallum, C.M., L. Comai, E.A. Greene, and S. Henikoff. 2000. Targeting induced local lesions in genomes (TILLING) for plant functional genomics. Plant Physiol 123: 439–442.
82. McGuire, D.C. and C.M. Rick. 1954. Self-incompatibility in species of Lycopersicon Sect. Eriopersicon and hybrids with L. esculentum. Hilgardia 23: 101–123.
83. Meissner, R., V. Chague, Q. Zhu, E. Emmanuel, Y. Elkind, and A.A. Levy. 2000. A high throughput system for transposon tagging and promoter trapping in tomato. Plant J 22: 265–274.
84. Meissner, R., Y. Jacobson, S. Melamed, S. Levyatuv, G. Shalev, A. Ashri, Y. Elkind, and A. Levy. 1997. A new model system for tomato genetics. Plant J 12: 1465–1472.
85. Melchers, G., M.D. Sacristan, and A.A. Holder. 1978. Somatic hybrid plants of potato and tomato regenerated from fused protoplasts. Carlsberg Res Commun 43: 203–218.
86. Menda, N., Y. Semel, D. Peled, Y. Eshed, and D. Zamir. 2004. In-silico screening of a saturate mutation library of tomato. Plant J 38: 861–872.
87. Menzel, M.Y. 1962. Pachytene Chromosomes of the intergeneric hybrid Lycopersicon esculentum x Solanum lycopersicoides. Am J Bot 49: 605–615.
88. Menzel, M.Y. 1964. Differential Chromosome pairing in allotetraploid Lycopersicon esculentum Solanum lycopersicoides. Genetics 50: 855–862.
89. Menzel, M.Y. and J.M. Price. 1966. Fine structure of synapsed Chromosomes in Fj Lycopersicon esculentum - Solanum lycopersicoides and its parents. Am J Bot 53: 1079–1086.
90. Michaelson, M.J., H.J. Price, J.R. Ellison, and J.S. Johnston. 1991. Comparison of plant DNA Contents determined by Fuelgen microspectrophotometry and laser flow Cytometry. Am J Bot 78: 183–188.
91. Miller, J.C. and S.D. Tanksley. 1990. RFLP analysis of phylogenetic relationships and genetic variation in the genus Lycopersicon. Theor Appl Genet 80: 437–448.
92. Monforte, A.J. and S.D. Tanksley. 2000a. Development of a set of near isogenic and backcross recombinant inbred lines Containing most of the Lycopersicon hirsutum genome in a esculentum genetic background: a tool for gene mapping and gene discovery. Genome 43: 803–813.
93. Monforte, A.J. and S.D. Tanksley. 2000b. Fine mapping of a quantitative trait locus (QTL) from Lycopersicon hirsutum Chromosome 1 affecting fruit Characteristics and agronomic traits: breaking linkage among QTLs affecting different traits and dissection of heterosis for yield. Theor Appl Genet 100: 471–479.
94. Mutschler, M.A., S.D. Tanksley, and C.M. Rick. 1987. Linkage maps of the tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Tomato Genet Coop Rep 37: 5–34.
95. Pan, Q., Y.-S. Liu, O. Budai-Hadrian, M. Sela, L. Carmel-Goren, D. Zamir, and R. Fluhr. 2000. Comparative genetics of nucleotide binding site-leucine rich repeat resistance gene homologues in the genomes of two dicotyledons: tomato and Arabidopsis. Genetics 155: 309–322.
96. Paran, I., I. Goldman, S.D. Tanksley, and D. Zamir. 1995. Recombinant inbred lines for genetic mapping in tomato. Theor Appl Genet 90: 542–548.
97. Parokonny, A.S., J.A. Marshall, M.D. Bennett, E.C. Cocking, M.R. Davey, and J.B. Power. 1997. Homeologous pairing and recombination in backcross derivatives of tomato somatic hybrids (Lycopersicon esculentum (+) L. peruvianum). Theor Appl Genet 94: 713–723.
98. Paterson, A.H., J.W. DeVerna, B. Lanini, and S.D. Tanksley. 1990. Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci using selected overlapping recombinant Chromosomes, in an interspecies Cross of tomato. Genetics 124: 735–742.
99. Pertuze, R.A., Y. Ji, and R.T. Chetelat. 2002. Comparative linkage map of the Solanum lycopersicoides and S. sitiens genomes and their differentiation from tomato. Genome 45: 1003–1012.
100. Pertuze, R.A., Y. Ji, and R.T. Chetelat. 2003. Transmission and recombination of homeologous Solanum sitiens Chromosomes in tomato. Theor Appl Genet 107: 1391–1401.
101. Peterson, D.G., N.L.V. Lapitan, and S.M. Stack. 1999. Localization of single- and low-copy sequences on tomato synaptonemal Complex spreads using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Genetics 152: 427–439.
102. Peterson, D.G., W.R. Pearson, and S.M. Stack. 1998. Characterization of the tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) genome using in vitro and in situ DNA reassociation. Genome 41: 346–356.
103. Peterson, D.G., H.J. Price, J.S. Johnston, and S.M. Stack. 1996. DNA Content of heterochromatin and euchromatin in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) pachytene Chromosomes. Genome 39: 77–82.
104. Pillen, K., O. Pineda, C.B. Lewis, and S.D. Tanksley. 1996. Status of genome mapping tools in the taxon Solanaceae. In: A.H. Paterson [ed.], Genome Mapping in Plants. R.G. Landes Co., pp. 282–308.
105. Quiros, C.F. 1991. Lycopersicon Cytogenetics. In: T. Tsuchiya and P.K. Gupta, [eds.], Chromosome Engineering in Plants: Genetics, Breeding, Evolution, Part B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 119–138.
106. Rick, C.M. 1945. A survey of Cytogenetic Causes of unfruitfulness in the tomato. Genetics 30: 347–362.
107. Rick, C.M. 1951. Hybrids between Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. and Solanum lycopersicoides Dun. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA) 37: 741–744.
108. Rick, C.M. 1967. Exploiting species hybrids for vegetable improvement. Proc XVII Int'l Hort Congress III: 217–229.
109. Rick, C.M. 1969. Controlled introgression of Chromosomes of Solanum pennellii into Lycopersicon esculentum: segregation and recombination. Genetics 62: 753–768.
110. Rick, C.M. 1971. Further studies on segregation and recombination in backcross derivatives of a tomato species hybrid. Biol Zentralbl 90: 209–220.
111. Rick, C.M. 1979. Biosystematic studies in Lycopersicon and Closely related species of Solanum. In: J.G. Hawkes, R.N. Lester and A.D. Skelding [eds.], The Biology and Taxonomy of the Solanaceae, Academic Press, New York, pp. 667–678.
112. Rick, C.M. 1988a. Evolution of mating systems in Cultivated plants. In: L.D. Gottlieb, and S.K. Jain. [eds.], Plant Evolutionary Biology. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 133–147.
113. Rick, C.M. 1988b. Tomato-like nightshades: affinities, autecology, and breeders opportunities. Econ Bot 42: 145–154.
114. Rick, C.M. 1990. New or otherwise noteworthy accessions of wild tomato species. Tomato Genet Coop Rep 40: 30.
115. Rick, C.M. and L. Butler. 1956. Cytogenetics of the tomato. Adv Genet 8: 267–382.
116. Rick, C.M., J.W. DeVerna, R.T. Chetelat, and M.A. Stevens. 1986. Meiosis in sesquidiploid hybrids of Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum lycopersicoides. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA) 83: 3580–3583.
117. Rick, C.M., J.F. Fobes, and M. Holle. 1977. Genetic variation in Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium: evidence of evolutionary Change in mating systems. Plant Syst Evol 127: 139–170.
118. Rick, C.M., J.F. Fobes, and S.D. Tanksley. 1979. Evolution of mating systems in Lycopersicon hirsutum as deduced from genetic variation in electrophoretic and morphological Characters. Plant Syst Evol 132: 279–298.
119. Rick, C.M. and G.S. Khush. 1961. X-ray-induced deficiencies of Chromosome 11 in the tomato. Genetics 46: 1389–1393.
120. Rick, C.M. and G.S. Khush. 1962. Preferential pairing in tetraploid tomato species hybrids. Genetics 47: 979–980.
121. Rick, C.M. and G.S. Khush. 1966. Chromosome engineering in Lycopersicon. In: R. Riley and K.R. Lewis. [eds.], Chromosome Manipulation and Plant Genetics. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh, pp. 8–20.
122. Rick, C.M. and J.I. Yoder. 1988. Classical and molecular genetics of tomato: highlights and perspectives. Ann Rev Genet 22: 281–300.
123. Robinson, R.W. 1982. A history of the Tomato Genetics Cooperative. Tomato Genet Coop Rep 32: 1–2.
124. Sawant, A.C. 1958. Cytogenetics of interspecific hybrids, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. x L. hirsutum Humb. and Bonpl. Genetics 43: 502–514.
125. Sherman, J.D. and S.M. Stack. 1992. Two-dimensional spreads of synaptonemal Complexes from solanaceous plants V Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) karyotype and idiogram. Genome 35: 354–359.
126. Sherman, J.D. and S.M. Stack. 1995. Two-dimensional spreads of synaptonemal Complexes from solanaceous plants. VI. High resolution recombination nodule map for tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Genetics 141: 683–708.
127. Spooner, D.M., I.E. Peralta, S. Knaap. 2005. Comparison of AFLPs with other markers for phylogenetic inference in wild tomatoes [Solanum L. section Lycopersicon (Mill.) Wettst.] Taxon 54: 43–61.
128. Stack, S. 1982. Two-dimensional spreads of synaptonemal Complexes from Solanaceous plants. I. The technique. Stain Technol 57: 265–272.
129. Stephan, W. and C.H. Langley. 1998. DNA Polymorphism in Lycopersicon and Crossing- over per physical length. Genetics 150: 1585–1593.
130. Stevens, M.A. and C.M. Rick. 1986. Genetics and breeding. In: J.G. Atherton and J. Rudich [eds.], The Tomato Crop: A Scientific Basis for Improvement. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 35–109.
131. Stommel, J.R. 2001. Barriers for introgression of Solanum ochranthum into tomato via somatic hybrids. J Am Soc Hort Sci 126: 387–388.
132. Stubbe, H. 1972a. Mutanten der Kulturtomate Lycopersicon esculentum Miller VI. Kulturpflanze 19: 185–230.
133. Stubbe, H. 1972b. Mutanten der Wildtomate Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium (Jusl.) Mill. IV. Kulturpflanze 19: 231–263.
134. Sybenga, J., E. Schabbink, J. van Eden, and J.H. de Long. 1994. Pachytene pairing and metaphase I Configurations in a tetraploid somatic Lycopersicon esculentum x L. peruvianum hybrid. Genome 37: 54–60.
135. Tanksley, S.D., M.W. Ganal, J.P. Prince, M.C. de Vicente, M.W. Bonierbale, P. Broun, T.M. Fulton, J.J. Giovanonni, S. Grandillo, G.B. Martin, R. Messeguer, J.C. Miller, L. Miller, A.H. Paterson, O. Pineda, M. Roder, R.A. Wing, W. Wu, and N.D. Young. 1992. High density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics 132: 1141–1160.
136. Tanksley, S.D. and C.M. Rick. 1980. Isozymic gene linkage map of the tomato: applications in genetics and breeding. Theor Appl Genet 57: 161–170.
137. Thomas, C.M., D.A. Jones, J.J. English, B.J. Carroll, J.L. Bennetzen, K. Harrison, A. Burbidge, G.J. Bishop, and J.D.G. Jones. 1994. Analysis of the Chromosomal distribution of transposon-carrying T-DNAs in tomato using the inverse polymerase Chain reaction. Mol Gen Genet 242: 573–585.
138. Tor, M., K. Manning, G.J. King, A.J. Thompson, G.H. Jones, G.B. Seymour, and S.J. Armstrong. 2002. Genetic analysis and FISH mapping of the Colourless non-ripening locus of tomato. Theor Appl Genet 104: 165–170.
139. Vallejos, C.E., S.D. Tanksley, and R. Bernatzky. 1986. Localization in the tomato genome of DNA restriction fragments Containing sequences homologous to the ribosomal RNA (45S), the major Chlorophyll A/B binding polypeptide and the ribulose bisphosphate Carboxylase genes. Genetics 112: 93–106.
140. van den Bulk, R.W., H.J.M. Loffler, W.H. Lindhout, and M. Koorneef. 1990. Somaclonal variation in tomato: effect of explant source and a Comparison with Chemical mutagenesis. Theor Appl Genet 80: 817–825.
141. Van Der Biezen, E.A., B. Overduin, H.J.J. Nijkamp, and J. Hille. 1994. Integrated genetic map of tomato Chromosome 3. Rpt Tomato Genet Coop 44: 8–10.
142. Van Der Hoeven, R., C. Ronning, J. Giovannoni, G. Martin, and S. Tanksley. 2002. Deductions about the number, organization, and evolution of genes in the tomato genome based on analysis of a large expressed sequence tag Collection and selective genomic sequencing. Plant Cell 14: 1441–1456.
143. Van Der Knaap, E., A. Sanyal, S.A. Jackson, and S.D. Tanksley. 2004. High-resolution fine mapping and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of sun, a locus Controlling tomato fruit shape, reveals a region of the tomato genome prone to DNA rearrangements. Genetics 168: 2127–2140.
144. van Ooijen, J.M., J.M. Sandbrink, M. Vrielink, R. Verkerk, P. Zabel, and P. Lindhout. 1994. An RFLP linkage map of Lycopersicon peruvianum. Theor Appl Genet 89: 1007–1013.
145. van Tuinen, A., M.-M. Cordonnier-Pratt, L. Pratt, R. Verkerk, P. Zabel, and M. Koornneef.
146. The mapping of phytochrome genes and photomorphogenic mutants of tomato. Theor Appl Genet 94: 115–122.
147. van Tuinen, A., A.H.L.J. Peters, and M. Koornneef. 1998. Mapping of the pro gene and revision of the Classical map of Chromosome 11. Tomato Genet Coop Rep 48: 62–70.
148. van Wordragen, M.F., R.L. Weide, E. Coppoolse, M. Koornneef, and P. Zabel. 1996. Tomato Chromosome 6: a high resolution map of the long arm and Construction of a Composite integrated marker-order map. Theor Appl Genet 92: 1065–1072.
149. Villand, J., P.W. Skroch, T. Lai, P. Hanson, C.G. Kuo, and J. Nienhuis. 1998. Genetic variation among tomato accessions from primary and secondary Centers of diversity. Crop Sci 38: 1339–1347.
150. Vision, T.J., Y. Xu, N. Van Eck, D.G. Brown, and S.D. Tanksley. 2001. A L. esculentum x L. pennellii backcross recombinant inbred population. Tomato Genet Coop Rep 51: 36.
151. Weide, R., M.F. van Wordragen, R.K. Lankhorst, R. Verkerk, C. Hanhart, T. Liharska, E. Pap, P. Stam, P. Zabel, and M. Koorneef. 1993. Integration of the Classical and molecular linkage maps of tomato Chromosome 6. Genetics 135: 1175–1186.
152. Williams, C.E. and D.A. Clair. 1993. Phenetic relationships and levels of variability detected by restriction fragment length polymorphism and random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of Cultivated and wild accessions of Lycopersicon esculentum. Genome 36: 619–630.
153. Wolters, A.M.A., H.C.H. Schoenmakers, S. Kamstra, J. van Eden, M. Koorneef, and J.H. de Jong. 1994. Mitotic and meiotic irregularities in somatic hybrids of Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum tuberosum. Genome 37: 726–735.
154. Xu, J. and E.D. Earle. 1994. Direct and sensitive fluorescence in situ hybridization of 45S rDNA on tomato Chromosomes. Genome 37: 1062–1065.
155. Xu, J. and E.D. Earle. 1996a. Direct FISH of 5S rDNA on tomato pachytene Chromosomes places the gene at the heterochromatic knob immediately adjacent to the Centromere of Chromosome 1. Genome 39: 216–221.
156. Xu, J. and E.D. Earle. 1996b. High resolution physical mapping of 45S (5.8S, 18S and 25S) rDNA gene loci in the tomato genome using a Combination of karyotyping and FISH of pachytene Chromosomes. Chromosoma 104: 545–550.
157. Young, N.D., J.C. Miller, and S.D. Tanksley. 1987. Rapid Chromosomal assignment of multiple genomic Clones in tomato using primary trisomics. Nucleic Acids Res 15: 9339–9348.
158. Zamir, D. 2001. Improving plant breeding with exotic genetic libraries. Nat Rev Genet 2: 983–989.
159. Zamir, D. and Y. Eshed. 1998. Tomato genetics and breeding using nearly isogenic introgression lines derived from wild species. In: A.H. Paterson [ed.], Molecular Dissection of Complex Traits. CRC Press Inc., FL, pp. 207–217.
160. Zamir, D. and S.D. Tanksley. 1988. Tomato genome is Composed largely of fast evolving low Copy number sequences. Mol Gen Genet 213: 254–261.
161. Zhong, X., P.F. Fransz, J. Wennekes-van Eden, P. Zabel, A. van Kammen, and J.H. de Jong. 1996. High-resolution mapping of pachytene Chromosomes and extended DNA fibres by fluorescence in-situ hybridisation. Plant Mol Biol Rep 14: 232–242.