Assessment of visual function in glaucoma: A report by the American academy of ophthalmology

Ophthalmology

Volumn 118, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 986-1002

  Jampel, Henry D ^a   Singh, Kuldev ^b   Lin, Shan C ^c   Chen, Teresa C ^d   Francis, Brian A ^e   Hodapp, Elizabeth ^f   Samples, John R ^g,h   Smith, Scott D ⁱ  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^g OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h ROCKY VISTA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

ⁱ Edward S Harkness Eye Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED PERIMETRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DISEASE COURSE; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TECHNOLOGY; VISION; VISION TEST; VISUAL FIELD;

ACADEMIES AND INSTITUTES; ALGORITHMS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DISEASE PROGRESSION; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; OPHTHALMOLOGY; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL; UNITED STATES; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 79955625132     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.03.019     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. S.C. Lin, K. Singh, H.D. Jampel Ophthalmic Technology Assessment Committee Glaucoma Panel Optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer analysis: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology Ophthalmology 114 2007 1937 1949 (Pubitemid 47483942)
2. A. Iwase, A. Tomidokoro, and M. Araie Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi Study Ophthalmology 114 2007 27 32 (Pubitemid 46014283)
3. B. Bengtsson, A. Heijl, and J. Olsson Evaluation of a new threshold visual field strategy, SITA, in normal subjects Acta Ophthalmol Scand 76 1998 165 169 (Pubitemid 28177203)
4. D.L. Budenz, P. Rhee, and W.J. Feuer Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects Ophthalmology 109 2002 1052 1058 (Pubitemid 34546910)
5. D.L. Budenz, P. Rhee, and W.J. Feuer Comparison of glaucomatous visual field defects using standard full threshold and Swedish interactive threshold algorithms Arch Ophthalmol 120 2002 1136 1141 (Pubitemid 35034334)
6. P.H. Artes, A. Iwase, and Y. Ohno Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43 2002 2654 2659 (Pubitemid 34809456)
7. D.H. Kelly Nonlinear visual responses to flickering sinusoidal gratings J Opt Soc Am 71 1981 1051 1055 (Pubitemid 12458525)
8. C.A. Johnson, and L.R. Shapiro A comparison of MOBS (modified binary search) and staircase test procedures in automated perimetry Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System 1989 Optical Society of America Washington, DC 84 87 Technical Digest Series 7
9. P. Fogagnolo, F. Mazzolani, L. Rossetti, and N. Orzalesi Detecting glaucoma with frequency-doubling technology perimetry: a comparison between N-30 and C-20 screening programs J Glaucoma 14 2005 485 491 (Pubitemid 41682244)
10. T. Pierre-Filho Pde, R.B. Schimiti, J.P. de Vasconcellos, and V.P. Costa Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, SITA Standard and SITA Fast perimetry in perimetrically inexperienced individuals Acta Ophthalmol Scand 84 2006 345 350
11. F.K. Horn, N. Wakili, A.M. Junemann, and M. Korth Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 240 2002 658 665 (Pubitemid 36075627)
12. F.K. Horn, A. Brenning, A.G. Junemann, and B. Lausen Glaucoma detection with frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength perimetry J Glaucoma 16 2007 363 371 (Pubitemid 46945533)
13. Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics Ask Professor Mean. ROC curve http://www.childrens-mercy.org/stats/ask/roc.asp Accessed March 5, 2010
14. R.V. North, A.L. Jones, and E. Hunter Evaluation of the high specificity Screening Program (C-201) of the Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) perimeter in clinical practice Eye (Lond) 20 2006 681 687 (Pubitemid 43880586)
15. H.A. Quigley Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology Am J Ophthalmol 125 1998 819 829 (Pubitemid 28283743)
16. A.C. Wadood, A. Azuara-Blanco, and P. Aspinall Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, and Humphrey Swedish interactive threshold algorithm-fast perimetry in a glaucoma practice Am J Ophthalmol 133 2002 327 332 (Pubitemid 34171581)
17. G. Corallo, M. Iester, and R. Scotto Rarebit perimetry and frequency doubling technology in patients with ocular hypertension Eur J Ophthalmol 18 2008 205 211 (Pubitemid 351692179)
18. K.E. Cello, J.M. Nelson-Quigg, and C.A. Johnson Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss Am J Ophthalmol 129 2000 314 322 (Pubitemid 30126076)
19. A.U. Bayer, K.P. Maag, and C. Erb Detection of optic neuropathy in glaucomatous eyes with normal standard visual fields using a test battery of short-wavelength automated perimetry and pattern electroretinography Ophthalmology 109 2002 1350 1361 (Pubitemid 34700930)
20. A. Ferreras, V. Polo, and J.M. Larrosa Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma? J Glaucoma 16 2007 372 383 (Pubitemid 46945534)
21. M. Iester, M. Altieri, and P. Vittone Detection of glaucomatous visual field defect by nonconventional perimetry Am J Ophthalmol 135 2003 35 39 (Pubitemid 36020421)
22. P.A. Sample, C.F. Bosworth, and E.Z. Blumenthal Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41 2000 1783 1790 (Pubitemid 30354350)
23. M.A. Soliman, L.A. de Jong, and A.A. Ismaeil Standard achromatic perimetry, short wavelength automated perimetry, and frequency doubling technology for detection of glaucoma damage Ophthalmology 109 2002 444 454 (Pubitemid 34184910)
24. J.R. Trible, R.O. Schultz, J.C. Robinson, and T.L. Rothe Accuracy of glaucoma detection with frequency-doubling perimetry Am J Ophthalmol 129 2000 740 745 (Pubitemid 30604152)
25. J.M. Burr, G. Mowatt, and R. Hernandez The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and economic evaluation Health Technol Assess 11 2007 iii-iv, ix-x, 1190
26. M. Tatemichi, T. Nakano, and K. Tanaka Performance of glaucoma mass screening with only a visual field test using frequency-doubling technology perimetry Am J Ophthalmol 134 2002 529 537 (Pubitemid 35304642)
27. Y.X. Wang, L. Xu, R.X. Zhang, and J.B. Jonas Frequency-doubling threshold perimetry in predicting glaucoma in a population-based study: The Beijing Eye Study Arch Ophthalmol 125 2007 1402 1406 (Pubitemid 47606608)
28. N. Yamada, P.P. Chen, and R.P. Mills Screening for glaucoma with frequency-doubling technology and Damato campimetry Arch Ophthalmol 117 1999 1479 1484 (Pubitemid 29536475)
29. S.A. Haymes, D.M. Hutchison, and T.A. McCormick Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal prospective study Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46 2005 547 554 (Pubitemid 40270334)
30. G. Hollo, A. Szabo, and P. Vargha Scanning laser polarimetry versus frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional threshold perimetry: changes during a 12-month follow-up in preperimetric glaucoma A pilot study Acta Ophthalmol Scand 79 2001 403 407 (Pubitemid 32677814)
31. F.A. Medeiros, P.A. Sample, and R.N. Weinreb Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss Am J Ophthalmol 137 2004 863 871 (Pubitemid 38582039)
32. P.A. Sample, F.A. Medeiros, and L. Racette Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47 2006 3381 3389 (Pubitemid 351639701)
33. A.U. Bayer, and C. Erb Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects Ophthalmology 109 2002 1009 1017 (Pubitemid 34465239)
34. C.A. Johnson, G.A. Cioffi, and E.M. Van Buskirk Frequency doubling technology perimetry using a 24-2 stimulus presentation pattern Optom Vis Sci 76 1999 571 581 (Pubitemid 29402656)
35. P.G. Spry, H.M. Hussin, and J.M. Sparrow Clinical evaluation of frequency doubling technology perimetry using the Humphrey Matrix 24-2 threshold strategy Br J Ophthalmol 89 2005 1031 1035 (Pubitemid 41081419)
36. T.W. Kim, L.M. Zangwill, and C. Bowd Retinal nerve fiber layer damage as assessed by optical coherence tomography in eyes with a visual field defect detected by frequency doubling technology perimetry but not by standard automated perimetry Ophthalmology 114 2007 1053 1057 (Pubitemid 46829366)
37. N. Leeprechanon, J.A. Giaconi, and A. Manassakorn Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma Ophthalmology 114 2007 931 937 (Pubitemid 46635852)
38. L. Racette, F.A. Medeiros, and L.M. Zangwill Diagnostic accuracy of the Matrix 24-2 and original N-30 frequency-doubling technology tests compared with standard automated perimetry Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49 2008 954 960
39. P. Brusini, M.L. Salvetat, M. Zeppieri, and L. Parisi Frequency doubling technology perimetry with the Humphrey Matrix 30-2 test J Glaucoma 15 2006 77 83
40. A. Patel, G. Wollstein, H. Ishikawa, and J.S. Schuman Comparison of visual field defects using matrix perimetry and standard achromatic perimetry Ophthalmology 114 2007 480 487
41. Z. Burgansky-Eliash, G. Wollstein, and A. Patel Glaucoma detection with matrix and standard achromatic perimetry Br J Ophthalmol 91 2007 933 938 (Pubitemid 47013108)
42. S. Hong, W. Chung, Y.J. Hong, and G.J. Seong Discriminating ability of Humphrey matrix perimetry in early glaucoma patients Ophthalmologica 221 2007 195 199 (Pubitemid 46631922)
43. S. Hong, H. Ahn, and S.J. Ha Early glaucoma detection using the Humphrey Matrix Perimeter, GDx VCC, Stratus OCT, and retinal nerve fiber layer photography Ophthalmology 114 2007 210 215 (Pubitemid 46161808)
44. L.M. Sakata, J. Deleon-Ortega, and S.N. Arthur Detecting visual function abnormalities using the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and matrix perimetry in eyes with glaucomatous appearance of the optic disc Arch Ophthalmol 125 2007 340 345 (Pubitemid 46425561)
45. H. Bagga, W.J. Feuer, and D.S. Greenfield Detection of psychophysical and structural injury in eyes with glaucomatous optic neuropathy and normal standard automated perimetry Arch Ophthalmol 124 2006 169 176 (Pubitemid 43247065)
46. C.A. Johnson, A.J. Adams, E.J. Casson, and J.D. Brandt Blue-on-yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous visual field loss Arch Ophthalmol 111 1993 645 650 (Pubitemid 23143173)
47. C.A. Johnson, J.D. Brandt, A.M. Khong, and A.J. Adams Short-wavelength automated perimetry in low-, medium-, and high-risk ocular hypertensive eyes: initial baseline results Arch Ophthalmol 113 1995 70 76
48. P.A. Sample, C.F. Bosworth, and R.N. Weinreb Short-wavelength automated perimetry and motion automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma Arch Ophthalmol 115 1997 1129 1133 (Pubitemid 27387948)
49. S. Demirel, and C.A. Johnson Incidence and prevalence of short wavelength automated perimetry deficits in ocular hypertensive patients Am J Ophthalmol 131 2001 709 715 (Pubitemid 32536701)
50. C.A. Girkin, A. Emdadi, and P.A. Sample Short-wavelength automated perimetry and standard perimetry in the detection of progressive optic disc cupping Arch Ophthalmol 118 2000 1231 1236
51. V. Polo, J.M. Larrosa, and I. Pinilla Predictive value of short-wavelength automated perimetry: a 3-year follow-up study Ophthalmology 109 2002 761 765 (Pubitemid 34270136)
52. J. van der Schoot, N.J. Reus, T.P. Colen, and H.G. Lemij The ability of short-wavelength automated perimetry to predict conversion to glaucoma Ophthalmology 117 2010 30 34
53. B. Bengtsson A new rapid threshold algorithm for short-wavelength automated perimetry Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44 2003 1388 1394 (Pubitemid 36297863)
54. B. Bengtsson, and A. Heijl Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs Ophthalmology 113 2006 1092 1097 (Pubitemid 43947230)
55. M. Ng, L. Racette, and J.P. Pascual Comparing the full-threshold and Swedish interactive thresholding algorithms for short-wavelength automated perimetry Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50 2009 1726 1733
56. L. Frisen High-pass resolution perimetry: a clinical review Doc Ophthalmol 83 1993 1 25 (Pubitemid 23179167)
57. L. Martin, and P. Wanger Five-year follow-up of treated patients with glaucoma using resolution perimetry J Glaucoma 7 1998 22 26 (Pubitemid 28069899)
58. B.C. Chauhan, P.H. House, T.A. McCormick, and R.P. LeBlanc Comparison of conventional and high-pass resolution perimetry in a prospective study of patients with glaucoma and healthy controls Arch Ophthalmol 117 1999 24 33 (Pubitemid 29056716)
59. P.G. Spry, and C.A. Johnson Identification of progressive glaucomatous visual field loss Surv Ophthalmol 47 2002 158 173 (Pubitemid 34256411)
60. E. Vesti, C.A. Johnson, and B.C. Chauhan Comparison of different methods for detecting glaucomatous visual field progression Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44 2003 3873 3879 (Pubitemid 37047957)
61. M. Schulzer Errors in the diagnosis of visual field progression in normal-tension glaucoma Ophthalmology 101 1994 1589 1594 discussion 1595
62. N. Hutchings, S.L. Hosking, J.M. Wild, and J.G. Flanagan Long-term fluctuation in short-wavelength automated perimetry in glaucoma suspects and glaucoma patients Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42 2001 2332 2337 (Pubitemid 32848863)
63. A.C. Lee, P.A. Sample, and E.Z. Blumenthal Infrequent confirmation of visual field progression Ophthalmology 109 2002 1059 1065 (Pubitemid 34546911)
64. K. Nouri-Mahdavi, D. Hoffman, M. Ralli, and J. Caprioli Comparison of methods to predict visual field progression in glaucoma Arch Ophthalmol 125 2007 1176 1181 (Pubitemid 47403022)
65. B. Bengtsson, and A. Heijl A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression Am J Ophthalmol 145 2008 343 353
66. P.A. Sample, M.H. Goldbaum, and K. Chan Using machine learning classifiers to identify glaucomatous change earlier in standard visual fields Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43 2002 2660 2665 (Pubitemid 34809457)
67. M.H. Goldbaum, P.A. Sample, and K. Chan Comparing machine learning classifiers for diagnosing glaucoma from standard automated perimetry Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43 2002 162 169 (Pubitemid 34032455)
68. D. Bizios, A. Heijl, and B. Bengtsson Trained artificial neural network for glaucoma diagnosis using visual field data: a comparison with conventional algorithms J Glaucoma 16 2007 20 28 (Pubitemid 46114769)
69. C. Boden, K. Chan, and P.A. Sample Assessing visual field clustering schemes using machine learning classifiers in standard perimetry Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48 2007 5582 5590 (Pubitemid 351260859)
70. C. Bowd, J. Hao, and I.M. Tavares Bayesian machine learning classifiers for combining structural and functional measurements to classify healthy and glaucomatous eyes Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49 2008 945 953
71. P.A. Sample, C. Boden, and Z. Zhang Unsupervised machine learning with independent component analysis to identify areas of progression in glaucomatous visual fields Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46 2005 3684 3692 (Pubitemid 44264673)
72. P.H. Chu, H.H. Chan, and B. Brown Luminance-modulated adaptation of global flash mfERG: fellow eye losses in asymmetric glaucoma Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48 2007 2626 2633 (Pubitemid 351261214)
73. D.C. Hood, L. Xu, and P. Thienprasiddhi The pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma patients with confirmed visual field deficits Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46 2005 2411 2418 (Pubitemid 43119487)
74. V. Parisi, S. Miglior, and G. Manni Clinical ability of pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials in detecting visual dysfunction in ocular hypertension and glaucoma Ophthalmology 113 2006 216 228 (Pubitemid 43170770)
75. C. Bowd, G. Vizzeri, and A. Tafreshi Diagnostic accuracy of pattern electroretinogram optimized for glaucoma detection Ophthalmology 116 2009 437 443
76. A. Tafreshi, L. Racette, and R.N. Weinreb Pattern electroretinogram and psychophysical tests of visual function for discriminating between healthy and glaucoma eyes Am J Ophthalmol 149 2010 488 495
77. B. Bengtsson Evaluation of VEP perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients Acta Ophthalmol Scand 80 2002 620 626 (Pubitemid 36024475)
78. I. Goldberg, S.L. Graham, and A.I. Klistorner Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss Am J Ophthalmol 133 2002 29 39 (Pubitemid 34076501)
79. D.C. Hood, P. Thienprasiddhi, and V.C. Greenstein Detecting early to mild glaucomatous damage: a comparison of the multifocal VEP and automated perimetry Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45 2004 492 498 (Pubitemid 38140506)
80. S.L. Graham, A.I. Klistorner, and I. Goldberg Clinical application of objective perimetry using multifocal visual evoked potentials in glaucoma practice Arch Ophthalmol 123 2005 729 739 (Pubitemid 41056594)
81. B. Fortune, S. Demirel, and X. Zhang Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48 2007 1173 1180 (Pubitemid 351261412)