The pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma patients with confirmed visual field deficits

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 46, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 2411-2418

  Hood, Donald C ^a   Xu, Li ^a   Thienprasiddhi, Phamornsak ^b   Greenstein, Vivienne C ^c   Odel, Jeffrey G ^b   Grippo, Tomas M ^b   Liebmann, Jeffrey M ^b   Ritch, Robert ^b  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b NEW YORK EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY   (United States)

^c College of Physicians and Surgeons ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRORETINOGRAM; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MALE; OPTOMETRY; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; WAVEFORM; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; RETINA; VISUAL DISORDER; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; AGED; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERIMETRY; RETINA; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 23244438414     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.05-0238     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Kerrigan-Baumrind LA, Quigley HA, Pease ME, Kerrigan DF, Mitchell RS. Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:741-748.
2. Riggs LA, Johnson LP, Schick AML. Electrical responses of the human eye to moving stimulus pattern. Science. 1964;144:567-568.
3. Holder GE. Significance of abnormal pattern electroretinography in anterior visual pathway dysfunction. Br J Ophthalmol. 1987;71: 166-171.
4. Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ, Robson JG. The uniform field and pattern ERG in macaques with experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:2797-2810.
5. Graham SL, Drance SM, Chauhan BC, et al. Comparison of psychophysical and electrophysiologic testing in early glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:2651-2662.
6. Korth M. The value of electrophysiologic testing in glaucomatous diseases. J Glaucoma. 1997;6:331-343.
7. Bach M. Electrophysiologic approaches for early detection of glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2001;2:S41-S49.
8. Holder GE. Pattern electroretinography (PERG) and an integrated approach to visual pathway diagnosis. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2001; 20:531-561.
9. Hood DC. Objective measurement of visual function in glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2003;14:78-82.
10. Johnson MA, Drum BA, Quigley HA, Sanchez RM, Dunkelberger GR. Pattern-evoked potentials and optic nerve fiber loss in monocular laser-induced glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1989; 30:897-907.
11. Holopigian K, Snow J, Seiple W, Siegel I. Variability of the pattern electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol. 1988;70:103-115.
12. Bartel P, Becker P, Robinson E. The intrasession repeatability of pattern electroretinograms and the effects of digital filtering. Doc Ophthalmol. 1991;76:351-358.
13. Jacobi PC, Walter P, Brunner R, Krieglstein GK. Reproducibility and intraindividual variability of the pattern electroretinogram (in German). Ger J Ophthalmol. 1994;3:216-219.
14. Odom, JV, Holder GE, Feghaldi JG, Cavender S. Pattern electroretinogram intrasession reliability: a two center comparison. Clin Vis Sci. 1992;7:263-281.
15. Porciatti V, Ventura LM. Normative data for a user-friendly paradigm for pattern electroretinogram recording. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:161-168.
16. Ventura LM, Porciatti V, Ishida K, Feuer WJ, Parrish RK II. Pattern electroretinogram abnormality and glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:10-19.
17. Bach M, Hiss PJR. Check-size specific changes of pattern electroretinograms in patients with early open-angle glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol. 1988;34:1710-1715.
18. Trick GL, Nesher R, Cooper DG, Shields SM. The human pattern ERG: alteration of response properties with aging. Optom Vis Sci. 1992;69:122-128.
19. Garway-Heath DF, Holder GE, Fitzke FW, et al. Relation between electrophysiologic, psychophysical, and anatomic measurements in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:2213-2220.
20. Hood DC, Greenstein VC. The multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2003;22:201-251.
21. Chauhan BC, Henson DB, Hobley AJ. Cluster analysis in visual field quantification. Doc Ophthalmol. 1988;69:25-39.
22. Katz J, Sommer A, Gaasterland DE, Anderson DR. Comparison of analytic algorithms for detecting glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:1684-1689.
23. Hood DC, Thienprasiddhi P, Greenstein VC, et al. Detecting early to mild glaucomatous damage: a comparison of the multifocal VEP and automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45: 492-498.
24. Celesia GG, Kaufman D, Cone S. Effects of age and sex on pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1987;68:161-171.
25. Porciatti V, Burr DC, Morrone MC, Fiorentini A. The effects of aging on the pattern electroretinogram and visual evoked potential in humans. Vision Res. 1992;32:1199-1209.
26. Pfeiffer N, Bach M. The pattern-electroretinogram in glaucoma and ocular hypertension: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study (in German). Ger J Ophthalmol. 1992;1:35-40.
27. Bach M, Sulimma F, Gerling J. Little correlation of the pattern-electroretinogram and visual field measures in early glaucoma Doc Ophthalmol. 1997/8;94:253-263.
28. Bach M, Hawlina M, Holder GE, et al. Standard for pattern electroretinography. International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision. Doc Ophthalmol. 2000;101:11-18.
29. Hood DC, Greenstein VC, Odel JG, et al. Visual field defects and multifocal visual evoked potentials: evidence for a linear relationship. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1672-1681.
30. Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ, Robson JG, et al. The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;42:514-522.