Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, SITA Standard and SITA Fast perimetry in perimetrically inexperienced individuals

Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica

Volumn 84, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 345-350

  Pierre Filho, Paulo de Tarso Ponte ^a,c   Schimiti, Rui Barroso ^a   Cabral de Vasconcellos, José Paulo ^a   Costa, Vital Paulino ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Glaucoma; Perimetry; Screening; Sensitivity; Specificity; Visual field

Indexed keywords

ANALYZER; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED PERIMETRY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH ROUTE; DISEASE SEVERITY; EXPERIENCE; GLAUCOMA; GOLD STANDARD; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL EXPERT; MEDICAL LITERATURE; OPTIC DISK; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCREENING TEST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; TECHNOLOGY; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PERIMETRY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 33646767440     PISSN: 13953907     EISSN: 16000420     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00639.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Anderson AJ & Johnson CA (2003): Frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 16: 213-225.
2. Anderson DR & Patella VM (1992): Automated Static Perimetry. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby 10-15.
3. Bebie H, Frankhauser F & Spahr J (1976): Static perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 54: 325-338.
4. Bengtsson B & Heijl A (1998a): SITA Fast, a new rapid perimetric threshold test: Description of methods and evaluation in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 76: 431-437.
5. Bengtsson B & Heijl A (1998b): Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 76: 268-272.
6. Bengtsson B, Olsson J, Heijl A & Rootzén H (1997): A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry: SITA. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 75: 368-375.
7. Budenz DL, Rhee P, Feuer WJ, McSoley J, Johnson CA & Anderson DR (2002): Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects. Ophthalmology 109: 1052-1058.
8. Burnstein Y, Ellish NJ, Magbalon M & Higginbotham EJ (2000): Comparison of frequency-doubling perimetry with Humphrey visual field analysis in a glaucoma practice. Am J Ophthalmol 129: 328-333.
9. Chylack LT, Wolfe JK & Singer DM et al. (1993): The Lens Opacities Classification System III. Arch Ophthalmol 111: 831-836.
10. Delgado MF, Nguyen NT & Cox TA et al. & the American Academy of Ophthalmology Ophthalmic Technology Assessment Committee 2001-02 Glaucoma Panel (2002): Automated Perimetry. A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 109: 2362-2374.
11. Fankhauser F, Koch P & Roulier A (1972): On automation of perimetry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 184: 126-150.
12. Garway-Heath DF & Hitchings RA (1998): Sources of bias in studies of optic disc and retinal nerve fibre layer morphology. Br J Ophthalmol 82: 986.
13. Gonzales de la Rosa M, Morales J & Dannheim F et al. (2003): Multicentre evaluation of tendency-oriented perimetry (TOP) using the G1 grid. Eur J Ophthalmol 13: 32-41.
14. Iwasaki A, Sugita M & Glaucoma Screening Project Study Group (2002): Performance of glaucoma mass screening with only a visual testing using frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 134: 529-537.
15. Johnson CA (2002): Recent developments in automated perimetry in glaucoma diagnosis and management. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 13: 77-84.
16. Johnson CA & Samuels SJ (1997): Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38: 413-425.
17. Joson PJ, Kamantigue ME & Chen PP (2002): Learning effects among perimetric novices in frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Ophthalmology 109: 757-760.
18. Kalaboukhova L & Lindblom B (2003): Frequency-doubling technology and high-pass resolution perimetry in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 81: 247-252.
19. Katz J, Tielsch JM, Quigley HA, Javitt J, Will K & Sommer A (1993): Automated suprathreshold screening for glaucoma: The Baltimore Eye Survey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34: 3271-3277.
20. King AJ, Taguri A, Wadood AC & Azuara-Blanco A (2002): Comparison of two fast strategies, SITA Fast and TOP, for the assessment of visual fields in glaucoma patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 240: 481-487.
21. Medeiros FA, Sample PA & Weinreb RN (2004): Frequency-doubling technology perimetry as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 137: 863-871.
22. Morales J, Weitzman ML & Gonzales de la Rosa M (2000): Comparison between tendency-oriented perimetry (TOP) and Octopus threshold perimetry. Ophthalmology 107: 134-142.
23. Patel SC, Friedman DS, Varadkar P & Robin AL (2000): Algorithm for interpreting the results of frequency-doubling perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 129: 323-327.
24. Quigley HA (1996): Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol 80: 389-393.
25. Quigley HA (1998): Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency-doubling technology. Am J Ophthalmol 125: 819-829.
26. Schimiti RB, Avelino RR, Kara-José N & Costa VP (2002): Full-threshold versus Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) in normal individuals undergoing automated perimetry for the first time. Ophthalmology 109: 2084-2092.
27. Sharma AK, Goldberg I, Graham SL & Mohsin M (2000): Comparison of the Humphrey Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) and full-threshold strategies. J Glaucoma 9: 20-27.
28. Shekar GC, Naduvilath TJ, Lakkai M, Jayakumar AJ, Pandi GT, Mandal AK & Honovar SG (2000): Sensitivity of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm in Humphrey visual field testing. Ophthalmology 107: 1303-1308.
29. Sponsel WE, Ritch R, Stamper R, Higginbotham EJ, Anderson DR, Wilson MR & Zimmerman TJ (1995): Prevent Blindness America visual field screening study. The Prevent Blindness America Glaucoma Advisory Committee. Am J Ophthalmol 120: 699-708.
30. Trible JR, Schultz RO, Robinson JC & Roth TL (2000): Accuracy of glaucoma detection with frequency-doubling perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 129: 740-745.
31. Wadood AC, Azuara-Blanco A, Aspinall LL, Taguri A & King AJ (2002): Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, and Humphrey Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm Fast perimetry in a glaucoma practice. Am J Ophthalmol 133: 327-332.