Comparison of conventional and high-pass resolution perimetry in a prospective study of patients with glaucoma and healthy controls

Archives of Ophthalmology

Volumn 117, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 24-33

  Chauhan, Balwantray C ^a,c   House, Philip H ^b   McCormick, Terry A ^a   LeBlanc, Raymond P ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b LIONS EYE INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^c Eye Care Centre   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANALYZER; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE COURSE; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; GONIOSCOPY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL FIELD;

EID: 0032927961     PISSN: 00039950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.117.1.24     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Fankhauser F. Koch P. Roulier A. On automation of perimetry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1972;184:126-150.
2. Heijl A. Krakau CET. An automatic perimeter for glaucoma visual field screening and control: construction and clinical cases. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1975;197:13-23.
3. Bebie H, Fankhauser F, Spahr J. Static perimetry: strategies. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1976;54:325-338.
4. Bebie H. Computerized techniques of visual field analysis. In: Drance SM, Anderson DR. eds. Automatic Perimetry in Glaucoma: A Practical Guide. New York. NY: Grune & Stratton Inc; 1985:147-160.
5. Heijl A, Lindgren G. Olsson J. A package for the statistical analysis of visual fields. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser. 1987;49:153-168.
6. Johnson CA. Selective versus nonselective losses in glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 1994; 3(suppl 1):S32-S44.
7. Quigley HA. Ganglion cell death in glaucoma: pathology recapitulates ontogeny. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1995;23:85-91.
8. Breton ME. Drum B. Functional testing in glaucoma: visual psychophysics and electrophysiology. In: Pitch R, Shields MB, Krupin T. eds. The Glaucomas. St Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book Inc: 1989:179-197.
9. Perry VH, Oehler R. Cowley A. Retinal ganglion cells that project to the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus in the macaque monkey. Neuroscience. 1984:12: 1101-1123.
10. Wässle H, Grünert U, Röhrenbeck J. Boycott BB. Cortical magnification factor and the ganglion cell density of the primate retina. Nature. 1989;341:643-646.
11. Quigley HA, Addicks EM, Green WR. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma, III: quantitative correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic neuropathy, papilledema, and toxic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982:100:135-146.
12. Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Green WR. Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;107:453-464.
13. Sample PA, Boynton RM, Weinreb RN. Isolating the color vision loss in primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1988;106:686-691.
14. Johnson CA, Adams A, Lewis RA. Automated perimetry of short-wavelength mechanisms in glaucoma and ocular hypertension: preliminary findings. In: Heijl A. ed. Perimetry Update 1988/89. Berkeley. Calif: Kugler & Ghedini: 1989:31-37.
15. Silverman SE, Trick GL. Hart WM. Motion perception isabnormal in primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990;31: 722-729.
16. Wall M, Ketoff KM. Random dot motion perimetry in patients with glaucoma and in normal subjects. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;120:587-596.
17. Fitzke FW. Poinoosawmy D. Ernst W. Hitchings RA. Peripheral displacement thresholds in normals, ocular hypertensives and glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser. 1987;49:447-452.
18. Johnson CA, Marshall D, Eng KM. Displacement threshold perimetry in glaucoma using a Macintosh computer system and a 21-inch monitor. In: Mills RP, Wall M, eds. Perimetry Update 1994/1995. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Kugler Publications; 1995:103-110.
19. Drum B, Breton M, Massof R, et al. Pattern discrimination perimetry: a new concept in visual field testing. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser. 1987;49:433-440.
20. Frisén L. A computer-graphics visual field screener using high-pass spatial frequency resolution targets and multiple feedback devices. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser. 1987;49:441-446.
21. Frisén L. Vanishing optotypes: new type of acuity test letters. Arch Ophthalmol. 1986;104:1194-1198.
22. Frisén L. High-pass resolution perimetry: evidence for parvocellular neural channel dependence. Neuro-ophthalmology. 1992;4:257-264.
23. Lindblom B. Effects of laser-induced retinal lesions on perimetric thresholds. Doc Ophthalmol. 1992:79:241-252.
24. Frisén L. High-pass resolution perimetry: central-field neuroretinal correlates. Vision Res. 1995;35:293-301.
25. Sample PA, Ahn DS. Lee PC, Weinreb RN. High-pass resolution perimetry in eyes with ocular hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992;113:309-316.
26. Martinez GA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Comparison of high-pass resolution perimetry and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995; 119:195-201.
27. Wall M, Conway MD, House PH. Allely R. Evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of spatial resolution and Humphrey automated perimetry in pseudotumor cerebri patients and normal subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:3306-3312.
28. Chauhan BC. House PH. Intratest variability in conventional and high-pass resolution perimetry. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:79-83.
29. Wall M, Lefante J. Conway M. Variability of high-pass resolution perimetry in normals and patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:3091-3095.
30. House PH, Cooper RL, Bulsara M. Comparing long-term variability using the Humphrey Field Analyzer and the Ring Perimeter in glaucoma patients and normal subjects. In: Mills RP, ed. Perimetry Update 1992/1993. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Kugler Publications: 1993:20-23.
31. Chauhan BC, Mohandas RN, Whelan JH, McCormick TA. Comparison of reliability indices in conventional and high-pass resolution perimetry. Ophthalmology. 1993;100:1089-1094.
32. Heijl A, Krakau CE. A note of fixation during perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1977;55:854-861.
33. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Lindgren A, et al. Extended empirical statistical package for evaluation of single and multiple fields: Statpac 2. In: Mills RP, Heijl A, eds. Perimetry Update 1990/1991. New York. NY: Kugler & Ghedini: 1991:303-315.
34. Heijl A. Lindgren A. Lindgren G. Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;108:130-135.
35. Drance SM, Douglas GR, Schulzer M, Wijsman CS. The learning effect of the Frisén high pass resolution perimeter. In: Heijl A, ed. Perimetry Update 1988/89. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Kugler & Ghedini: 1989:199-201.
36. House PH, Schulzer M. Drance SM, Douglas GR. The effect of lens opacity on the resolution visual field in normal subjects. Doc Ophthalmol. 1993;83:27-32.
37. House PH, Drance SM, Schulzer M, Wijsman K. The effect of refractive blur on the visual field using the ring perimeter. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1990;63: 87-90.
38. Martin L. Cataract and high-pass resolution perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1997;75:174-177.
39. Chauhan BC. McCormick TA, Whelan JH. Mohandas RN. Variability of normal visual fields in a prospective study. In: Mills RP. Wall M. eds. Perimetry Update 1994/1995. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Kugler; 1995:27-30.
40. Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Casson EJ. Brandt JD. Progression of early glaucomatous visual field loss for blue-on-yellow and standard white-on-white automated perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:651-656.
41. Sample PA. Taylor JDN. Martinez GA. Lusky M. Weinreb RN. Short-wavelength color visual fields in glaucoma suspects at risk. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115: 225-233.
42. Johnson CA, Samuels SJ. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:413-425.
43. Bengtsson B. Olsson J, Heijl A, Rootzen H. A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry: SITA. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1997;75: 368-375.
44. Bengtsson B, Heijl A, Olsson J. Evaluation of a new threshold visual field strategy, SITA. in normal subjects: Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998:76:165-169.