Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss

American Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 129, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 314-322

  Cello, Kimberly E ^a   Nelson Quigg, Jacqueline M ^a   Johnson, Chris A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b DEVERS EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; TECHNOLOGY; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MIDDLE AGED; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PERIMETRY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0034000981     PISSN: 00029394     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9394(99)00414-6     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Kelly D.H. Frequency doubling in visual responses. J Opt Soc Am. 56:1966;1628-1633.
2. Kelly D.H. Nonlinear visual responses to flickering sinusoidal gratings. J Opt Soc Am. 71:1981;1051-1055.
3. Tyler C.W. Observations on spatial frequency doubling. Perception. 3:1974;81-86.
4. Maddess T., Henry G.H. Performance of nonlinear visual units in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Clin Vision Sci. 7:1992;371-383.
5. Maddess T., Goldberg I., Dobinson J., Wine S., James A.C. Clinical trials of the frequency doubling illusion as an indicator of glaucoma. (ARVO abstracts) Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 36:(suppl):1995;S335.
6. Chaturvedi N., Hedley-White E.T., Dreyer E.B. Lateral geniculate nucleus in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 116:1993;182-188.
7. Dandona L., Hendrickson A., Quigley H.A. Selective effects of experimental glaucoma on axonal transport by retinal ganglion cells in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 32:1991;1593-1599.
8. Quigley H.A., Dunkelberger G.R., Green W.R. Chronic human glaucoma causing selectively greater loss of large optic nerve fibers. Ophthalmology. 95:1988;357-363.
9. Quigley H.A., Sanchez R.M., Dunkelberger G.R., Henaut N.L., Baginsky T.A. Chronic glaucoma selectively damages large optic nerve fibers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 28:1987;913-918.
10. Johnson C.A., Samuels S.J. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 28:1997;413-425.
11. Johnson CA, Demirel S. The role of spatial and temporal factors in frequency doubling perimetry. In: Heijl A, Wall M, editors. Perimetry update, 1996/1997. Amsterdam: Kugler Publishers, 1997:13-19.
12. Sponsel W.E., Arango S., Trigo Y., Menash J. Clinical classification of glaucomatous visual field loss by frequency doubling perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 125:1998;830-836.
13. Kondo Y., Yamamoto T., Sato Y., Matsubara M., Kitizawa Y. A frequency-doubling perimetric study in normal-tension glaucoma with hemifield defect. J Glaucoma. 7:1998;261-265.
14. Chauhan B.C., Johnson C.A. Test-retest variability characteristics of frequency doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal controls. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 40:1999;648-656.
15. Quigley H.A. Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology. Am J Ophthalmol. 125:1998;819-829.
16. Johnson CA, Cioffi GA, Van Buskirk EM. Evaluation of two screening tests for frequency doubling technology perimetry. In: Wall M, Wild J, editors. Perimetry Update 1998/1999. Amsterdam: Kugler Publishers. Forthcoming.
17. Adams C.W., Bullimore M.A., Wall M., Fingeret M., Johnson C.A. Normal aging effects for frequency doubling technology perimetry. Optom Vis Sci. 76:1999;582-587.
18. Tyrrell R.A., Owens D.A. A rapid technique to assess the resting states of the eyes and other threshold phenomena the modified binary search (MOBS) . Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 20:1988;137-141.
19. Johnson CA, Shapiro LR. A comparison of MOBS (modified binary search) and staircase test procedures in automated perimetry. In: Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System Technical Digest Series. Washington: Optical Society of America Press, 1989:84-87.
20. Hart W.M., Yablonnski M., Kass M.A., Becker B. Multivariate analysis of the risk of glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol. 97:1979;1455-1458.
21. Massof R.W., Emmel T.C. Criterion-free parameter-free distribution-independent index of diagnostic test performance. Appl Opt. 26:1987;1395-1408.
22. Bengtsson B., Olsson J., Heijl A., Rootzen H. A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 75:1997;368-375.
23. Bengtsson B., Heijl A., Olsson J. Evaluation of a new threshold visual field strategy, SITA, in normal subjects Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm . Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 76:1998;165-169.
24. Bengtsson B., Heijl A. Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 76:1998;268-272.