Glaucoma detection with matrix and standard achromatic perimetry

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 91, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 933-938

  Burgansky Eliash, Zvia ^a   Wollstein, Gadi ^a   Patel, Avni ^a   Bilonick, Richard A ^a   Ishikawa, Hiroshi ^a   Kagemann, Larry ^a   Dilworth, William D ^a   Schuman, Joel S ^a  

^a University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBERS; OPTIC DISK; PERIMETRY; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 34347354335     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2006.110437     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Sommer A, Miller NR, Pollack I, et al. The nerve fiber layer in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1977;95:2149- 56.
2. Harwerth RS, Carter-Dawson L, Shen F, et al. Ganglion cell losses underlying visual field defects from experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:2242-50.
3. Quigley HA, Addicks EM, Green WR. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. III. Quantitative correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic neuropathy, papilledema, and toxic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol 1982;100:135-46.
4. Lewis RA, Johnson CA, Keltner JL, et al. Variability of quantitative automated perimetry in normal observers. Ophthalmology 1986;93:878-81.
5. Heijl A, Lindgren A, Lindgren G. Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. Am J Ophthalmol 1989;108:130-5.
6. Cello KE, Nelson-Quigg JM, Johnson CA. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:314-22.
7. Quigley HA. Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology. Am J Ophthalmol 1998;125:819-29.
8. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, et al. Comparison of the GDx VCC scanning laser polarimeter, HRT II confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, and stratus OCT optical coherence tomograph for the detection of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:827-37.
9. Bayer AU, Erb C. Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1009-17.
10. Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, et al. Frequency doubling technology perimetry with the Humphrey Matrix 30-2 test. J Glaucoma 2006;15:77-83.
11. Patel A, Wollstein G, Ishikawa H, et al. Comparison of visual field defects using matrix perimetry and standard achromatic perimetry. Ophthalmology 2007;114:480-7.
12. Budenz DL, Michael A, Chang RT, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the StratusOCT for perimetric glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2005;112:3-9.
13. R development core team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org (accessed 13 April 2007).
14. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837-45.
15. Adams CW, Bullimore MA, Wall M, et al. Normal aging effects for frequency doubling technology perimetry. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76:582-7.
16. Anderson AJ, Johnson CA. Effect of dichoptic adaptation on frequency-doubling perimetry. Optom Vis Sci 2002;79:88-92.
17. Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;137:863-71.
18. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J. The effect of perimetric experience in normal subjects. Arch Ophthalmol 1989;107:81-6.
19. Kulze JC, Stewart WC, Sutherland SE. Factors associated with a learning effect in glaucoma patients using automated perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh), 1990;68:681-6.
20. Werner EB, Krupin T, Adelson A, et al. Effect of patient experience on the results of automated perimetry in glaucoma suspect patients. Ophthalmology 1990;97:44-8.
21. Iester M, Capris P, Pandolfo A, et al. Learning effect, short-term fluctuation, and long-term fluctuation in frequency doubling technique. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;130:160-4.
22. Horani A, Frenkel S, Yahalom C, et al. The learning effect in visual field testing of healthy subjects using frequency doubling technology. J Glaucoma 2002;11:511-16.
23. Fujimoto N, Minowa K, Miyauchi O, et al. Learning effect for frequency doubling perimetry in patients with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;133:269-70.
24. Matsuo H, Tomita G, Suzuki Y, et al. Learning effect and measurement variability in frequency-doubling technology perimetry in chronic open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2002;11:467-73.
25. Gordon MO, Kass MA. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: design and baseline description of the participants. Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:573-83.
26. Krupin T, Liebmann JM, Greenfield DS, et al. The Low-pressure Glaucoma Treatment Study (LoGTS) study design and baseline characteristics of enrolled patients. Ophthalmology 2005;112:376- 85.
27. Newkirk MR, Gardiner SK, Demirel S, et al. Assessment of false positives with the Humphrey Field Analyzer II perimeter with the SITA Algorithm. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:4632-7.
28. Zangwill LM, Williams J, Berry CC, et al. A comparison of optical coherence tomography and retinal nerve fiber layer photography for detection of nerve fiber layer damage in glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2000;107:1309-15.
29. Cullinane AB, Waldock A, Diamond JP, et al. Optic disc cup slope and visual field indices in normal, ocular hypertensive and early glaucomatous eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:555-9.
30. Gupta N, Ang LC, Noel de Tilly L, et al. Human glaucoma and neural degeneration in intracranial optic nerve, lateral geniculate nucleus, and visual cortex. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:674-8.
31. Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Berry CC, et al. Detecting early glaucoma by assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and visual function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:1993-2003.