Five-year follow-up of treated patients with glaucoma using resolution perimetry

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 22-26

  Martin, Lene ^a   Wanger, Peter ^b  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b ST ERIK S EYE HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Glaucoma; High pass resolution perimetry; Treatment follow up

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SLIT LAMP; TONOMETRY; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 0031891940     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00061198-199802000-00005     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Rosetti L, Marchetti I, Orzalesi N, Scorpiglione N, Torri V, Liberati A. Randomized clinical trials on medical treatment of glaucoma. Are they appropriate to guide clinical practice? Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:96-103.
2. Crick R, Newson R, Shipley M, Blackmore H, Bulpitt C. The progress of the visual field in chronic simple glaucoma and ocular hypertension treated topically with pilocarpine and with timolol. Eye 1990;4:563-71.
3. Messmer C, Rammer J, Stümpfig D. Influence of betaxolol and timolol on the visual fields of patients with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1991;111:678-81.
4. Mao LK, Stewart WC, Schields MB. Correlation between intraocular pressure control and progressive glaucomatous damage in primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1991;111:51-5.
5. O'Brien C, Schwartz B, Takamoto T, Da Ching Wu. Intraocular pressure and the rate of visual field loss in chronic open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1991;111:491-500.
6. Schulzer M, Drance SM, Douglas GR. A comparison of treated and untreated glaucoma suspects. Ophthalmology 1991;98:301-7.
7. Chauhan B, Drance S. The relationship between intraocular pressure and visual field progression in glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1992;230:521-6.
8. Vogel R, Crick R, Mills K, Reynolds P, Sass W, Clineschmidt C, Tipping R. Effect of timolol versus pilocarpine on visual field progression in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1992;99:1505-11.
9. Migdal C, Gregory W, Hitchings R. Long-term functional outcome after early surgery compared with laser and medicine in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1993;101:1651-7.
10. Weber J, Koll W, Kriegelstein G. Intraocular pressure and visual field decay in chronic glaucoma. Ger J Ophthalmol 1993;2:165-9.
11. Zeyen TG, Caprioli J. Progression of disc and field damage in early glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:62-5.
12. Ruben ST, Hitchings RA, Fitzke R, Arden GB. Electrophysiology and psychophysics in ocular hypertension and glaucoma: evidence for different pathomechanisms in early glaucoma. Eye 1994;8: 516-20.
13. Larena C, Gironella R, Motos PJ, Pita D. Rate of campimetric improvement during medical treatment of simple chronic glaucoma. Chibret International Journal of Ophthalmology 1992;9:6-13.
14. Hitchings RA, Migdal CS, Wormald R, Poinooswamy D, Fitzke F. The primary treatment trial: changes in the visual field analysis by computer-assisted perimetry. Eye 1994;8:117-20.
15. Wilensky JT, Joondeph BC. Variation in visual field measurements with an automated perimeter. Am J Ophthalmol 1984;97: 328-31.
16. Lewis RA, Johnson CA, Keltner JL, Labermeier PK. Variability of quantitative automated perimetry in normal observers. Ophthalmology 1986;93:878-81.
17. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J. Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field. Arch Ophthalmol 1987;105:1544-9.
18. Chauhan BC, House PH. Intratest variability in conventional and high-pass resolution perimetry. Ophthalmology 1991;98:79-83.
19. Sommer A, Katz J, Quigley HA, et al. Clinically detectable nerve fiber atrophy precedes the onset of glaucomatous field loss. Arch Ophthlamol 1991;109:77-83.
20. Airaksinen PJ, Tuulonen A, Alanko HI. Rate and pattern of neuroretinal rim area decrease in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1992;110:206-10.
21. Graham S, Drance SM, Chanhan BL, Swindale NV, Hnik P, Mikelberg FS, Douglas GR. Comparison of phsychophysical and electrophysiological testing in early glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996;37:2651-62
22. Johnson CA, Brandt JD, Khong AM, Adams AJ. Short-wavelength automated perimetry in low-, medium- and high-risk ocular hypertensive eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:70-6.
23. Wanger P, Persson HE. Pattern-reversal electroretinograms in unilateral glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1983;24:749-53.
24. Wanger P, Persson HE. Pattern-reversal electroretinograms from normotensive, hypertensive and glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmologica 1987;195:205-8.
25. Ruben ST, Arden GB, O'Sullivan F, Hitchings R. Pattern electroretinogram and peripheral color contrast thresholds in ocular hypertension and glaucoma: comparison and correlation of results. Br J Ophthalmol 1995;79:326-31.
26. Wu J, Fitzke F, Poinooswamy D, Hitchings R. Four years follow-up of the fellow eye of unilateral glaucoma patients using motion sensitivity [Abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994;35:2185.
27. Yo TC, Falcao-Reis FM, Spileers W, Arden GB. Peripheral colour contrast: a new screening test for pre-glaucomatous visual loss. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;32:2779-89.
28. Wanger P, Persson HE. Pattern-reversal electroretinograms and high-pass resolution perimetry in suspected or early glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1987;94:1098-1103.
29. Lindblom B. High-pass resolution perimetry: a new method for the early detection of visual field defects. Chibret International Journal of Ophthalmology 1990;1:33-41.
30. Martin-Boglind LM, Wanger P. The effect of treatment on the results of high-pass resolution perimetry in glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol 1994;72:423-8.
31. Martinez GA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Comparison of high-pass resolution perimetry and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1995;119:195-201.
32. Frisén L. Resolution theory and high-pass resolution perimetry (HRP). In: Mills RP, ed. Perimetry Update 1992/1993. Amsterdam, New York: Kugler Publications, 1993:419-27.
33. Frisén L. High-pass resolution targets in peripheral vision. Ophthalmology 1987;94:1104-8.
34. Sample PA, Ahn DS, Lee PC, Weinreb RN. High-pass resolution perimetry in eyes with ocular hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1992;113:309-16.
35. Kono Y, Maeda M, Yamamoto T, Kitazawa Y. A comparative study between high-pass resolution perimetry and differential light sensitivity perimetry in glaucoma patients. In: Mills RP, ed. Perimetry Update 1992/1993. Amsterdam, New York: Kugler Publications, 1993:409-13.
36. Graham SL, Drance SM. Interpretation of high-pass resolution perimetry with a probability plot. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1995;233:140-9.
37. Airaksinen PJ, Tuulonen A, Välimäki J, Alanko HI. Retinal nerve fiber layer abnormalities and high-pass resolution perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol 1990;68:687-9.
38. Tomita G, Maeda M, Sogano S, Kitazawa Y. An analysis of the relationship between high-pass resolution perimetry and neuroretinal rim area in normal-tension glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol 1993; 71:196-200.
39. Iester M, Rolando M, Mochi B, Semino E, Traverso CE, Zingirian M. Optic disk features and "neural capacity" of high-pass resolution perimetry. In: Mills RP, Wall M, eds. Perimetry Update 1994/1995. Amsterdam, New York: Kugler Publications 1995:211-6.
40. Kono Y, Chi Q, Tomita G, Yamamoto T, Kitazawa Y. Relationship between quadrants of neuroretinal rim area of glaucomatous optic disk and both "neural capacity" of high-pass resolution perimetry and mean deviation in HFA: a comparative study [Abstract]. In: Mills RP, Wall M, eds. Perimetry Update 1994/1995. Amsterdam, New York: Kugler Publications, 1995:209.
41. Martin-Boglind LM, Wanger P. The influence of feed-back devices, learning and cheating on the results of high-pass resolution perimetry. In: Heijl A, ed. Perimetry Update. Proceedings of the VIIIth International Perimetric Society Meeting 1988/89. Amstelveen: Kugler and Ghedini Publications, 1989:393-8.
42. Drance SM, Douglas GR, Schulzer M, Wijsman CS. The learning effect of the Frisén high-pass resolution perimeter. In: Heijl A, ed. Perimetry Update. Proceedings of the VIIIth International Perimetric Society Meeting 1988/89. Amstelveen: Kugler and Ghedini Publications, 1989:199-201.
43. Martin-Boglind LM, Wanger P. Computer-assisted evaluation of the results from high-pass resolution perimetry; a knowledge-based system. In: Mills RP, Heijl A, eds. Perimetry Update 90/91. Amsterdam, New York:Kugler Publications, 1991:297-301.
44. Wanger P, Martin-Boglind LM. High-pass resolution perimetry: comparison between mean dB score and neural capacity in glaucoma diagnosis and follow-up. In: Mills RP, Heijl A, eds. Perimetry Update 1992/1993. Amsterdam, New York:Kugler Publications, 1992:415-8.
45. Frisén L. A computer graphics visual field screener using high-pass spatial frequency resolution targets and multiple feedback devices. Doc Ophthalmol 1987;49:441-6.
46. Frisén L. High-pass resolution perimetry. A clinical review. Doc Ophthalmol 1993;83:1-25.
47. House PH, Schultzer M, Drance SM, Douglas GR. The effect of lens opacity on the resolution visual field in normal subjects. Doc Ophthalmol 1993;83:27-32.
48. Martin L. Cataract and high-pass resolution perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1997;75:174-7.
49. Douglas GR, Drance SM, Mickelberg FS, Schultzer M, Wijsman K. Variability of the Frisén ring perimeter. In: Heijl A. ed. Perimetry Update, Proceedings of the VIIIth International Perimetric Society Meeting 1988/89. Amstelveen:Kugler and Ghedini Publications, 1989:197-8.
50. House PH, Cooper RL, Bulsara M. Comparing long-term variability using the Humphrey field analyzer and the ring perimeter in glaucoma patients and normal subjects. In: Mills RP, Heijl A, eds. Perimetry Update 1992/1993. Amsterdam/New York: Kugler Publications, 1992:63-77.
51. Hayreh SS. Progress in the understanding of the vascular etiology of glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 1994;5:26-35.
52. Schumer RA, Podos SM. The nerve of glaucoma! Arch Ophthalmol 1994;112:37-44.
53. Schwartz M, Belkin M, Yoles E, Solomon A. Potential treatment modalities for glaucomatous neuropathy: neuroprotection and neuroregeneration. J Glaucoma 1996;5:427-32.