A Visual Field Index for Calculation of Glaucoma Rate of Progression

American Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 145, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 343-353

  Bengtsson, Boel ^a   Heijl, Anders ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CATARACT; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DISEASE COURSE; GLAUCOMA; GLAUCOMA PROGRESSION INDEX; HUMAN; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEAN DEVIATION INDEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CATARACT; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; PILOT PROJECTS; PROBABILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 38349107673     PISSN: 00029394     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.09.038     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Fitzke F.W., Hitchings R.A., Poinoosawmy D., McNaught A.I., and Crabb D.P. Analysis of visual field progression in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 80 (1996) 40-48
2. Heijl A., Lindgren G., Lindgren A., et al. Extended empirical statistical package for evaluation of single and multiple fields: Statpac 2. In: Mills R.P., and Heijl A. (Eds). Perimetry update 1990/1 (1991), Kugler and Ghedini, New York, New York 303-315
3. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study Investigators. Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability. Ophthalmology 101 (1994) 1445-1455
4. Musch D.C., Lichter P.R., Guire K.E., and Standardi C.L. The Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study: study design, methods, and baseline characteristics of enrolled patients. Ophthalmology 106 (1999) 653-662
5. Leske M.C., Heijl A., Hyman L., and Bengtsson B. Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial: design and baseline data. Ophthalmology 106 (1999) 2144-2153
6. Leske C., Heijl A., Hyman L., Bengtsson B., Dong L., Yang Z., and EMGT Group. Predictors of long-term progression in the early manifest glaucoma trial. Ophthalmology 114 (2007) 1965-1972
7. Holmin C., and Krakau C.E.T. Regression analysis on the central visual field in chronic glaucoma cases. A follow-up study using automatic perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol 60 (1982) 267-274
8. Weijland A., Fankhauser F., Bebie H., and Flammer J. Automated perimetry, visual field digest. 5th ed. (2004), Haag-Streit AG, Switzerland 120
9. Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group. Natural history of normal-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology 108 (2001) 247-253
10. Heijl A., Leske M.C., Bengtsson B., and Hussein M. Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 81 (2003) 286-293
11. Nouri-Mahdavi K., Hoffman D., Gaasterland D., and Caprioli J. Prediction of visual field progression in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45 (2004) 4346-4351
12. Klein B.E., Klein R., and Jensen S.C. Visual sensitivity and age-related eye disease: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 3 (1996) 47-55
13. Smith S.D., Katz J., and Quigley H.A. Effect of cataract extraction on the results of automated perimetry in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 115 (1997) 1515-1519
14. Chen P.P., and Budenz D.L. The effects of cataract extraction on the visual field of eyes with chronic open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 125 (1998) 325-333
15. Kim Y.Y., Kim J.S., Shin D.H., Kim C., and Jung H.R. Effect of cataract extraction on blue-on-yellow visual field. Am J Ophthalmol 132 (2001) 217-220
16. Koucheki B., Nouri-Mahdavi K., Patel G., Gaasterland D., and Caprioli J. Visual field changes after cataract extraction: the AGIS experience. Am J Ophthalmol 138 (2004) 1022-1028
17. Heijl A., Lindgren G., and Olsson J. A package for the statistical analysis of visual fields. In: Greve E.L., and Heijl A. (Eds). Seventh international visual field symposium, Amsterdam 1986. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 49 (1987), Martinus Nijhof/Dr W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands 153-168
18. Bengtsson B., and Heijl A. False negative responses in glaucoma perimetry: indicators of patient performance or test reliability?. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41 (2000) 2201-2204
19. Heijl A., Lindgren G., Olsson J., and Åsman P. Visual field interpretation with empirical probability maps. Arch Ophthalmol 107 (1989) 204-208
20. Levi D.M., Klein S.A., and Aitsebaomo A.P. Vernier acuity, crowding, and cortical magnification. Vision Res 25 (1985) 963-977
21. Weijland A., Fankhauser F., Bebie H., and Flammer J. Automated Perimetry. Visual field digest. 5th ed. (2004), Haag-Streit AG, Switzerland 100
22. Soliman M.A., de Jong L.A., Ismaeil A.A., van den Berg T.J., and de Smet M.D. Standard achromatic perimetry, short wavelength automated perimetry, and frequency doubling technology for detection of glaucoma damage. Ophthalmology 109 (2002) 444-454
23. Johnson C.A., Wall M., Fingeret M., and Lalle P. In A primer for frequency doubling technology (1998), Welch Allyn, Skaneateles, New York, New York 10
24. Åsman P., Wild J.M., and Heijl A. Appearance of the pattern deviation map as a function of change in area of localized field loss. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45 (2004) 3099-3106
25. Vingrys A.J., and Zele A.J. Robust indices of clinical data: meaningless means. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46 (2005) 4353-4357
26. Åsman P., and Heijl A. Diffuse visual field loss and glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol 72 (1994) 303-308
27. Chauhan B.C., LeBlanc R.P., Shaw A.M., Chan A.B., and McCormick T.A. Repeatable diffuse visual field loss in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 104 (1997) 532-538
28. Weber J.T. Topographie der funktionellen Schädigung beim chronishen glaukom (1992), Kaden Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany 81
29. Artes P.H., Nicolela M.T., LeBlanc R.P., and Chauhan B.C. Visual field progression in glaucoma: total versus pattern deviation analyses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46 (2005) 4600-4606
30. Manassakorn A., Nouri-Mahdavi K., Kouecheki B., Law S.K., and Caprioli J. Pointwise linear regression analysis for detection of visual field progression with absolute versus corrected threshold sensitivities. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47 (2006) 2896-2903
31. Stewart W.C., Kolker A.E., Sharpe E.D., et al. Factors associated with long-term progression or stability in primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 130 (2000) 274-279
32. Leske M.C., Heijl A., Hussein M., Bengtsson B., Hyman L., and Komaroff E. Factors for progression and the effect of treatment: the early manifest glaucoma trial. Arch Ophthalmol 121 (2003) 48-56
33. Nouri-Mahdavi K., Hoffman D., Coleman A.L., et al. Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. Predictive factors for glaucomatous visual field progression in the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. Ophthalmology 111 (2004) 1627-1635
34. Jonas J.B., Martus P., Horn F.K., Junemann A., Korth M., and Budde W.M. Predictive factors of the optic nerve head for development or progression of glaucomatous visual field loss. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45 (2004) 2613-2618
35. Mikelberg F.S., Sculzer M., Drance S.M., and Lau W. The rate of progression of scotomas in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 101 (1986) 1-6
36. Kwon Y.H., Kim C.S., Zimmerman M.B., Alward W.L., and Hayreh S.S. Rate of visual field loss and long-term visual outcome in primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 132 (2001) 47-56
37. McNaught A.I., Crabb D.P., Fitzke F.W., and Hitchings R.A. Modelling series of visual fields to detect progression in normal-tension glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 233 (1995) 750-755