Identification of progressive glaucomatous visual field loss

Survey of Ophthalmology

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 158-173

  Spry, Paul G D ^a   Johnson, Chris A ^b  

^a BRISTOL EYE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b DEVERS EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Glaucoma; Perimetry; Progression; Variability; Visual field

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE COURSE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; VISION TEST; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT;

EID: 0036201237     PISSN: 00396257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0039-6257(01)00299-5     Document Type: Review

References (122)

1. Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability
2. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 1. Study design and methods and baseline characteristics of study patients
3. Criteria for progression of glaucoma in clinical management and in outcome studies
4. Frequency distribution of early glaucomatous visual field defects
5. Image processing of perimetric threshold data for detection of progressive visual field loss
6. Static perimetry: Strategies
7. Static perimetry: Accuracy and fluctuations
8. Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma
9. SITA Fast, a new rapid perimetric threshold test. Description of methods and evaluation in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma
10. Evaluation of a new threshold visual field strategy, SITA, in normal subjects. Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm
11. Perimetric probability maps to separate change caused by glaucoma from that caused by cataract
12. Determining progressive visual field loss in serial Humphrey visual fields
13. Evaluating sources of variability for standard and SWAP visual fields in glaucoma patients, suspects and normals
14. Comparison of long-term variability for standard and short-wavelength automated perimetry in stable glaucoma patients
15. Long-term fluctuation of the visual field in glaucoma
16. The normal visual field on the Humphrey field analyzer
17. Comparison of clinician judgment with digitized image analysis in the detection of induced optic disk change in monkey eyes
18. Short-term fluctuation as an estimate of variability in visual field data
19. The use of visual field indices in detecting changes in the visual field in glaucoma
20. Visual field damage in normal-tension and high-tension glaucoma
21. Intratest variability in conventional and high-pass resolution perimetry
22. Comparison of conventional and high-pass resolution perimetry in a prospective study of patients with glaucoma and healthy controls
23. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects
24. Effect of the number of threshold determinations on short-term fluctuation in automated perimetry
25. Characteristics of frequency-of-seeing curves in normal subjects, patients with suspected glaucoma, and patients with glaucoma
26. The frequency distribution of early visual field defects in glaucoma
27. Predicting long-term visual field outcome in progressive glaucoma using different lengths of field series
28. Improving the prediction of visual field progression in glaucoma using spatial processing
29. The glaucomatous visual field defect
30. Psychophysics 1. Discrimination and detection
31. Threshold fluctuations in the Humphrey Field Analyzer and in the Octopus automated perimeter
32. Programs SARGON and DELTA: Two new principles for the automated analysis of the visual field
33. Image processing of computerised visual field data
34. Analysis of visual field progression in glaucoma
35. The concept of visual field indices
36. Quantification of glaucomatous visual field defects with automated perimetry
37. Differential light threshold. Short- and long-term fluctuation in patients with glaucoma, normal controls, and patients with suspected glaucoma
38. Evaluation of FASTPAC, a new strategy for threshold estimation with the Humphrey Field Analyzer, in a glaucomatous population
39. Early stage progression in glaucomatous visual field changes
40. Simulations for FASTPAC and the standard 4-2 dB full-threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyzer
41. Interpretation of automated perimetry for glaucoma by neural network
42. Influence of age on the visual fields of normal subjects
43. The onset and evolution of glaucomatous visual field defects
44. The Humphrey field analyzer, construction and concepts
45. Glaucoma follow-up when converting from long to short perimetric threshold tests
46. Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields
47. Extended empirical statistical package for evaluation of single and multiple fields in glaucoma: Statpac 2
48. Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field
49. A package for the statistical analysis of visual fields
50. Visual field interpretation with empiric probability maps
51. The frequency distribution of earliest glaucomatous visual field defects documented by automatic perimetry
52. Response variability in the visual field: Comparison of optic neuritis, glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal eyes
53. The relationship between sensitivity and variability in normal and glaucomatous visual fields
54. Influence of fixation accuracy on threshold variability in patients with open angle glaucoma
55. Fixation accuracy of patients with glaucoma during full threshold perimetry
56. Frequency distribution of early glaucomatous visual field defects
57. Spatial classification of glaucomatous visual field loss
58. Perimetry - Back to the future?
59. Regression analysis of the central visual field in chronic glaucoma cases. A follow-up study using automatic perimetry
60. Visual field decay in normal subjects and in cases of chronic glaucoma
61. The long-term fluctuation of the visual field in stable glaucoma
62. Age-related changes of the normal visual field
63. The benefit of early trabeculectomy versus conventional management in primary open angle glaucoma relative to severity of disease
64. The rate of visual field loss in untreated primary open angle glaucoma
65. Selective versus non-selective losses in glaucoma
66. Progression of early glaucomatous visual field loss as detected by blue-on-yellow and standard white-on-white automated perimetry
67. Properties of staircase procedures for estimating thresholds in automated perimetry
68. On the definition of age-related norms for visual function testing
69. Scoring systems for measuring progression of visual field loss in clinical trials of glaucoma treatment
70. Methodological variations in estimating apparent progressive visual field loss in clinical trials of glaucoma treatment
71. Estimating progression of visual field loss in glaucoma
72. Asymmetry and variation in the normal hill of vision
73. Comparison of visual field defects in normal-tension glaucoma and high- tension glaucoma
74. The different effects of aging on normal sensitivity in flicker and light-sense perimetry
75. Comparison of visual field progression algorithms
76. Early manifest glaucoma trial: Design and baseline data
77. Variability of quantitative automated perimetry in normal observers
78. Variability of expert observers in evaluating the optic disc
79. Neural networks for visual field analysis: How do they compare with other algorithms?
80. Intraocular pressure and progression of glaucomatous visual field loss
81. Visual field progression: Comparison of Humphrey Statpac2 and pointwise linear regression analysis
82. Modelling series of visual fields to detect progression in normal-tension glaucoma
83. The mode of progression of visual field defects in glaucoma
84. The rate of progression of scotomas in glaucoma
85. The Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study: Study design, methods, and baseline characteristics of enrolled patients
86. Regression analysis of visual field progression in low tension glaucoma
87. Comparison of methods to detect visual field progression in glaucoma
88. Intraocular pressure and the rate of visual field loss in chronic open-angle glaucoma
89. Evaluation of the Humphrey FASTPAC threshold program in glaucoma
90. The visual field in chronic open angle glaucoma: The rate of change in different regions of the field
91. Point by point linear regression analysis of automated visual fields in primary open angle glaucoma
92. When does visual aging begin?
93. Rate of progression in open-angle glaucoma estimated from cross-sectional prevalence of visual field damage
94. Rate of visual field loss in progressive glaucoma
95. The effect of age on normal human optic nerve fiber number and diameter
96. Errors in the diagnosis of visual field progression in normal-tension glaucoma
97. Probability maps for evaluating automated visual fields
98. Decrease in retinal nerve fibre layer thickness with progressive visual field loss in open-angle glaucoma
99. Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma
100. Visual field analysis using artificial neural networks
101. Simulation of longitudinal threshold visual field data
102. Quantitative comparison of static perimetric strategies in early glaucoma: Test-retest variability
103. The Bristol Shared Care Glaucoma Study: Reliability of community optometric and hospital eye service test measures
104. Senescent changes of the visual field: An age-old problem
105. Spatial and temporal processing of threshold data for detection of progressive glaucomatous visual field loss
106. Variability components of standard automated perimetry and frequency doubling technology perimetry
107. The statistical reliability of signals in single neurons in cat and monkey visual cortex
108. Early detection of visual field progression in glaucoma: A comparison of PROGRESSOR and STATPAC 2
109. How often do patients need visual field tests?
110. Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli
111. The properties of perimetric thresholds in normal and glaucomatous eyes
112. A comparison of experienced clinical observers and statistical tests in detection of progressive visual field loss in glaucoma using automated perimetry
113. Early visual field disturbances in glaucoma
114. Regression techniques in the analysis of visual field loss
115. Pointwise topographical and longitudinal modeling of the visual field in glaucoma
116. Pointwise univariate linear regression of perimetric sensitivity against follow-up time in glaucoma
117. The statistical interpretation of blue-on-yellow visual field loss
118. Variation in visual field measurements with an automated perimeter
119. Risk factors for rate of progression of glaucomatous visual field loss: A computer-based analysis
120. Serial examination of the normal visual field using Octopus automated projection perimetry. Evidence for a learning effect
121. Trend analyses of automated visual fields