Comparison of methods to predict visual field progression in glaucoma

Archives of Ophthalmology

Volumn 125, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1176-1181

  Nouri Mahdavi, Kouros ^a   Hoffman, Douglas ^a   Ralli, Monica ^a   Caprioli, Joseph ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b JULES STEIN EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVANCED GLAUCOMA INTERVENTION STUDY; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE COURSE; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GLAUCOMA; GLAUCOMA CHANGE PROBABILITY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROBABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 34548626056     PISSN: 00039950     EISSN: 00039950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.125.9.1176     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Flammer J, Drance SM, Zulauf M. Differential light threshold: short- and long-term fluctuation in patients with glaucoma, normal controls and glaucoma suspects. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102(5):704-706.
2. Flammer J, Drance SM, Augustiny L, Funkhouser A. Quantification of glaucomatous visual field defects with automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985;26(2):176-181.
3. Boeglin RJ, Caprioli J, Zulauf M. Long-term fluctuation of the visual field in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992;113(4):396-400.
4. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J, Asman P. Visual field interpretation with empiric probability maps. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107(2):204-208.
5. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L, Bengtsson B. Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial: design and baseline data. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(11):2144-2153.
6. Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, Hussein M. Measuring visual field progression in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2003;81(3):286-293.
7. Noureddin BN, Poinoosawmy D, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Regression analysis of visual field progression in low tension glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1991;75(8):493-495.
8. Birch MK, Wishart PK, O'Donnell NP. Determining progressive visual field loss in serial Humphrey visual fields. Ophthalmology. 1995;102(8):1227-1235.
9. McNaught AI, Crabb DP, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Visual field progression: comparison of Humphrey Statpac2 and pointwise linear regression analysis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1996;234(7):411-418.
10. Smith SD, Katz J, Quigley HA. Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37(7):1419-1428.
11. Nouri-Mahdavi K, Brigatti L, Weitzman M, Caprioli J. Comparison of methods to detect visual field progression in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1997;104(8):1228-1236.
12. Nouri-Mahdavi K, Caprioli J, Coleman AL, Hoffman D, Gaasterland D. Pointwise linear regression for evaluation of visual field outcomes and comparison with the advanced glaucoma intervention study methods. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(2):193-199.
13. Katz J, Gilbert D, Quigley HA, Sommer A. Estimating progression of visual field loss in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1997;104(6):1017-1025.
14. Chauhan BC, Drance SM, Douglas GR. The use of visual field indices in detecting changes in the visual field in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990;31(3):512-520.
15. Wild JM, Hussey MK, Flanagan JG, Trope GE. Pointwise topographical and longitudinal modeling of the visual field in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34(6):1907-1916.
16. Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study, 2: visual field test scoring and reliability. Ophthalmology. 1994;101(8):1445-1455.
17. Musch DC, Lichter PR, Guire KE, Standardi CL. The Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study: study design, methods, and baseline characteristics of enrolled patients. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(4):653-662.
18. Katz J. Scoring systems for measuring progression of visual field loss in clinical trials of glaucoma treatment. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(2):391-395.
19. Vesti E, Johnson CA, Chauhan BC. Comparison of different methods for detecting glaucomatous visual field progression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(9):3873-3879.
20. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS), 1: study design and methods and baseline characteristics of study patients. Control Clin Trials. 1994;15(4):299-325.
21. Holmin C, Krakau CE. Regression analysis of the central visual field in chronic glaucoma cases: a follow-up study using automatic perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1982;60(2):267-274.
22. Katz J, Congdon N, Friedman DS. Methodological variations in estimating apparent progressive visual field loss in clinical trials of glaucoma treatment. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117(9):1137-1142.
23. Lee AC, Sample PA, Blumenthal EZ, Berry C, Zangwill L, Weinreb RN. Infrequent confirmation of visual field progression. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(6):1059-1065.