Frequency doubling technology perimetry using a 24-2 stimulus presentation pattern

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 76, Issue 8, 1999, Pages 571-581

  Johnson, Chris A ^a,b   Cioffi, George A ^a   Van Michael Buskirk, E ^a  

^a DEVERS EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b DEVERS EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Frequency doubling; Glaucoma; Ocular hypertension; Perimetry; Visual fields

Indexed keywords

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; VISION;

FREQUENCY DOUBLING TECHNOLOGY (FDT) PERIMETRY; GLAUCOMA; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY; VISUAL FIELD LOSS;

OPHTHALMOLOGY;

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REFERENCE VALUES; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0032773752     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199908000-00026     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Kelly, DH. Frequency doubling in visual responses. J Opt Soc Am 1966:56:1628-33.
2. Kelly DH. Nonlinear visual responses to flickering sinusoidal gratings. J Opt Soc Am 1981;71:1051-5.
3. Richards W, Feiton TB. Spatial frequency doubling: retinal or central? Vision Res 1973:13:2129-37.
4. Tyler CW. Observations on spatial-frequency doubling. Perception 1974:3:81-6.
5. Virsu V, Nyman G, Lehtio PK. Diphasic and polyphasic temporal modulations multiply apparent spatial frequency. Perception 1974; 3:323-36.
6. Tolhurst DJ. Illusory shifts in spatial frequency caused by temporal modulation. Perception 1975:4:331-5.
7. Virsu V, Laurinen P. Long-lasting afterimages caused by neural adaptation. Vision Res 1977;17:853-50.
8. Maddess T, Henry GH. Performance of nonlinear visual units in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Clin Vis Sci 1992:7:371-83.
9. Maddess T, Goldberg I, Dobinson J, Wine S, James AC. Clinical trials of the frequency doubled illusion as a indicator of glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sciencel995,36:S335.
10. Johnson CA, Samuels SJ. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997:38:413-25.
11. Johnson CA, Demirel S. The role of spatial and temporal factors in frequency doubling perimetry. In: Wall M, Heijl A, eds. Perimetry Update, 1996/1997. Amsterdam: Kugler Publishers, 1997:13-9.
12. Sponsel WE, Arango S, Trigo Y, Mensah J. Clinical classification of glaucomatous visual field loss by frequency doubling perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 1998:125:830-6.
13. Kondo Y, Yamamoto T, Sato Y, Matsubara M, Kitazawa Y. A frequency-doubling perimetric study in normal-tension glaucoma with hemifield defect. J Glaucoma 1998:7:261-5.
14. Quigley HA. Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology. Am J Ophthalmol 1998:125:819-29.
15. Sample PA, Bosworth CF, Lee BL, Ferez J, Weinreb RN. Comparison of standard, short-wavelength, frequency-doubling and motion perimetry in eyes with glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998;39:S656.
16. Tyrrell RA, Owens DA. A rapid technique to assess the resting states of the eyes and other threshold phenomena: the modified binary search (MOBS). Behav Res Meth Instr Comp 1988;20:137-41.
17. Adams CW, Bullimore MA, Wall M, Fingeret M, Johnson CA. Normal aging effects for frequency doubling technology perimetry. Optorn Vis Sci 1999:76:582-7.
18. Chauhan BC, Johnson CA. Test-retest variability characteristics of frequency doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal controls. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40:648-56.
19. Glovinsky Y, Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR. Retinal ganglion cell loss is size dependent in experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991:32:484-91.
20. Chaturvedi N, Hedley-Whyte ET, Dreyer EB. Lateral geniculate nucleus in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1993:116:182-8.
21. Johnson CA. Selective vs. non-selective losses in glaucoma. J Glaucoma 1994;3:S32-S44.