Too Smart for Their Own Good: The Disadvantage of a Superior Processing Capacity for Adult Language Learners

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 30-58

  Cochran, Barbara Pitts ^a   McDonald, Janet L ^a   Parault, Susan J ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Critical period hypothesis; adult language acquisition; processing capacity and language acquisition

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002296787     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2633     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Baddeley A. D., Papagno C., Vallar G. When long-term learning depends on short-term storage. Journal of Memory and Language. 27:1988;586-595.
2. Bellugi U., Lillo-Martin D., O'Grady L., van Hoek K. The development of spatialized syntactic mechanisms in American Sign Language. Edmondson W. H., Karlsson F. SLR '87: Papers from the fourth international symposium on sign language research. 1987;16-25 Signum Press, Hamburg.
3. Bialystok E. The structure of age: In search of barriers to second language acquisition. Second Language Research. 13:1997;116-137.
4. Birdsong D. Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Language. 68:1992;706-755.
5. Coppieters R. Competence differences between native and near-native signers. Language. 63:1987;544-573.
6. Elman J. L. Learning and development in neural networks: The importance of starting small. Cognition. 48:1993;71-99.
7. Emmorey K. Processing a dynamic visual-spatial language: Psycholinguistic studies of American Sign Language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 22:1993;153-187.
8. Emmorey K., Bellugi U., Friederici A., Horn P. Effects of age of acquisition on grammatical sensitivity: Evidence from on-line and off-line tasks. Applied Psycholinguistics. 16:1995;1-23.
9. Emmorey K., Corina D. Lexical recognition in sign language: Effects of phonetic structure and morphology. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 71:1990;1227-1252.
10. Friederici A. D. Children's sensitivity to function words during sentence comprehension. Linguistics. 21:1983;717-739.
11. Friedman L. A. Space, time and person reference in American Sign Language. Language. 51:1975;940-961.
12. Goldowsky B. N., Newport E. L. Modeling the effects of processing limitations on the acquisition of morphology: The Less is More hypothesis. Clark E. V. The proceedings of the twenty-fourth annual child language research forum. 1993;124-138 Stanford Linguistics Assoc, Stanford.
13. Harrington M., Sawyer M. L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skill. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 14:1992;25-38.
14. Johnson J. S. Critical period effects in second language acquisition: The effect of written versus auditory materials on the assessment of grammatical competence. Language Learning. 42:1992;217-248.
15. Johnson J. S., Newport E. L. Critical period effects in second-language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology. 21:1989;60-99.
16. Kareev Y. Through a narrow window: Working memory capacity and the detection of covariation. Cognition. 56:1995;263-269.
17. Kareev Y., Lieberman I., Lev M. Through a narrow window: Sample size and the perception of correlation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 126:1997;278-287.
18. Krashen S. D. Lateralization, language learning and the critical period: Some new evidence. Language Learning. 23:1973;63-74.
19. Krashen S. D., Long M. A., Scarcella R. C. Age, rate and eventual attainment in second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly. 13:1979;573-582.
20. Lenneberg E. H. Biological foundations of language. 1967;Wiley, New York.
21. Liddell S. K. Four functions of a locus: Reexamining the structure of space in ASL. Lucas C. Sign language research: Theoretical issues. 1990;176-198 Gallaudet Univ. Press, Washington.
22. Mayberry R., Eichen E. The long-lasting advantage of learning sign language in childhood: Another look at the critical period for language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language. 30:1991;486-512.
23. Mayberry R., Fischer S. Looking through phonological shape to lexical meaning: The bottleneck of non-native sign language processing. Memory and Cognition. 17:1989;740-754.
24. Meier, R. P. 1982, Icons, analogues, and morphemes: The acquisition of verb agreement in American Sign Language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univ. of California, San Diego.
25. Meier R. P. Elicited imitation of verb agreement in American Sign Language: Iconically or morphologically determined? Journal of Memory and Language. 26:1987;362-376.
26. Neville H. J. Developmental specificity in neurocognitie development in humans. Gazzaniga M S. The cognitive neurosciences. 1995;219-231 MIT Press, Cambridge.
27. Neville H. J., Mills D. L., Lawson D. S. Fractionating language: Different neural subsystems with different sensitive periods. Cerebral Cortex. 2:1992;244-258.
28. Newport E. L. Constraints on learning and their role in language acquisition: Studies of the acquisition of American Sign Language. Language Sciences. 10:1988;147-172.
29. Newport E. L. Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science. 14:1990;11-28.
30. Newport, E. L. 1991, Contrasting conceptions of the critical period for language. In, S. Carey & R. Gelman, (Eds.), The epigenesis of mind, (pp, 111, - 130, ), Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum.
31. Newport E. L., Meier R. P. Acquisition of American Sign Language. Slobin D. I. The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 1: The data. 1985;881-938 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
32. Padden C. A. The relation between space and grammar in ASL verb morphology. Lucas C. Sign language research: Theoretical issues. 1990;118-132 Gallaudet Univ. Press, Washington.
33. Plunkett K., Karmiloff-Smith A., Bates E., Elman J. L. Connectionism and developmental psychology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines. 38:1997;53-80.
34. Service E. Phonology, working memory, and foreign-language learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 45A:1992;21-50.
35. Snow C. E., Hoefnagel-Höhle M. The critical period for language acquisition: Evidence from second language learning. Child Development. 49:1978;1114-1128.
36. Supalla T. Serial verbs of motion in ASL. Fischer S. D., Siple P. Theoretical issues in sign language research, Vol. 1: Linguistics. 1990;127-152 The Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
37. Weber-Fox J., Neville H. J. Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 8:1996;231-256.
38. White L., Genesee F. How native is near-native? The issue of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Research. 12:1996;233-265.
39. Wilbur R. B. American Sign Language: Linguistic and applied dimensions. 1987;College Hill Press, Boston.