TOWARD A NEW NATIVISM

Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 621-633

  O'Grady, William ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937181049     PISSN: 02722631     EISSN: 14701545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0272263199004040     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Chomsky, N. (1973). Conditions on transformations. In S. Anderson & P. Kiparsky (Eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle (pp. 232-286). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
2. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
3. Chomsky, N. (1986). Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Collins, C. (1994). Economy of derivation and the Generalized Proper Binding Condition. Linguistic Inquiry, 25, 45-61.
6. Crain, S., & Thornton, R. (1998). Investigating Universal Grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431-469.
8. Eckman, F., Bell, L., & Nelson, D. (1988). On the generalization of relative clause instruction in the acquisition of English as a second language. Applied Linguistics, 9, 1-13.
9. Ellis, N. (1996). Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 91-126.
10. Elman, J., Bates, E., Johnson, M., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Fox, B. (1987). The noun phrase accessibility hierarchy reinterpreted: Subject primacy or the absolutive hypothesis. Language, 63, 856-870.
12. Fukui, N. (1996). On the nature of economy in language. Ninti Kagaku, 3, 51-71.
13. Gass, S. (1979). Language transfer and universal grammatical relations. Language Learning, 29, 327-344.
14. Gass, S. (1980). An investigation of syntactic transfer in adult second language learners. In R. Scarcella & S. Krashen (Eds.), Research in second language acquisition (pp. 132-141). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
15. Gass, S. (1982). From theory to practice. In M. Hines & W. Rutherford (Eds.), On TESOL 81 (pp. 129-139). Washington, DC: TESOL.
16. Hawkins, R. (1989). Do second language learners acquire restrictive relative clauses on the basis of relational or configurational information The acquisition of French subject, direct object and genitive restrictive clauses by second language learners. Second Language Research, 5, 156-188.
17. Hildebrand, J. (1984). Markedness, acquisition, and preposition stranding: What are children born with Unpublished masters thesis, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
18. Lee, M. (in press). The comparative difficulty of subject and dative relative clauses in Korean. Hawaii Working Papers in Linguistics.
19. Lempert, H., & Kinsbourne, M. (1980). Preschool childrens sentence comprehension: Strategies with respect to word order. Journal of Child Language, 7, 371-379.
20. OGrady, W. (1987). Principles of grammar and learning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. OGrady, W. (1996). Language acquisition without Universal Grammar: A proposal for L2 learning. Second Language Research, 12, 374-397.
22. OGrady, W. (1997). Syntactic development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Pienemann, M. (1989). Is language teachable Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 10, 52-79.
24. Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
26. Slobin, D. (1985). Cross-linguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In D. Slobin (Ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition. Vol. 2: Theoretical issues (pp. 1157-1256). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Stromswold, K. (1995). The acquisition of subject and object wh questions. Language Acquisition, 4, 5-48.
28. Tarallo, F., & Myhill, J. (1983). Interference and natural language processing in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 33, 55-76.
29. Tavakolian, S. (1978). The conjoined-clause analysis of relative clauses and other structures. In H. Goodluck & L. Solan (Eds.), Papers in the structure and development of child language (pp. 37-83). Amherst, MA: UMass Graduate Linguistic Student Association.
30. Wolfe-Quintero, K. (1992). Learnability and the acquisition of extraction in relative clauses and wh questions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 39-70.
31. Yoshinaga, N. (1996). Wh-questions: A comparative study of their form and acquisition in English and Japanese. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii at Manoa.