What's different in second-language processing? Evidence from event-related brain potentials

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 251-266

  Hahne, Anja ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

ERPs; Second language learning; Semantics; Sentence processing; Syntax

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADULT; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0035345844     PISSN: 00906905     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1010490917575     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Ardal, S., Donald, M. W., Meuter, R., Muldrew, S., & Luce, M. (1990). Brain responses to semantic incongruity in bilinguals. Brain and Language, 39, 187-205.
2. Brown, C., Hagoort, P., & Kutas, M. (2000). Postlexical integration processes in language comprehension: Evidence from brain-imaging research. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (pp. 881-895). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Chee, M. W. L., Caplan, D., Soon, C. S. Sriram, N., Tan, E. W. L., Thiel, T., & Weekes, B. (1999a). Processing of visually presented sentences in Mandarin and English studied with fMRI. Neuron, 23, 127-137.