Bayesian phylogenetic model selection using reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1123-1133

  Huelsenbeck, John P ^a   Larget, Bret ^b,c   Alfaro, Michael E ^a  

^a University of California at San Diego   (United States)

^b University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian phylogenetic inference; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Maximum likelihood; Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo; Substitution models

Indexed keywords

DNA;

AKAIKE INFORMATION CRITERION; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BAYESIAN INFORMATION CRITERION; CALCULATION; DECISION MAKING; DNA SEQUENCE; DNA SUBSTITUTION; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; MONTE CARLO METHOD; MUTATION RATE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEIC ACID BASE SUBSTITUTION; NUCLEIC ACID BASE TRANSITION RATE; NUCLEIC ACID BASE TRANSVERSION RATE; PHYLOGENY; REVERSIBLE JUMP MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO METHOD; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STATISTICAL BIAS; STATISTICAL MODEL; SUBSTITUTION MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; BAYES THEOREM; CLASSIFICATION; MARKOV CHAINS; MODELS, GENETIC; MONTE CARLO METHOD; MUTATION; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 2442671519     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msh123     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Adachi, J., and M. Hasegawa. 1995. Phylogeny of whales: dependence of the inference on species sampling. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:177-179.
2. Akaike, H. 1973. Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Pp. 267-281 in B. N. Petrov and F. Csaki, eds. Second International Symposium on Information Theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest.
3. Alfaro, M. E., and S. J. Arnold. 2001. Molecular systematics and evolution of Regina and the thamnophiine snakes. Mol. Phylo. Evol. 21:408-423.
4. Amason, U., A. Gullberg, and A. Janke. 1997. Phylogenetic analyses of mitochondrial DNA suggest a sister group relationship between Xenartha (Edentata) and Ferungulates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:762-768.
5. Barns, S. M., C. F. Delwiche, J. D. Palmer, and N. R. Pace. 1996. Perspectives on archaeal diversity, thermophyly and monophyly from environmental rRNA sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:9188-9193.
6. Bell, E. T. 1934. Exponential numbers. Am. Math. Monthly 41:411-419.
7. Brower, A. V. Z. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships among the Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera) inferred from partial sequences of the wingless gene. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. B 267:1201-1211.
8. Cox, D. R. 1962. Further results on tests of families of alternate hypotheses. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 24:406-424.
9. Felsenstein, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17:368-376.
10. -. 1984. Distance methods for inferring phylogenies: a justification. Evolution 38:16-24.
11. Goldman, N. 1993. Statistical tests of models of DNA substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 36:182-198.
12. Goldman, N., and Z. Yang. 1994. A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:725-736.
13. Green, P. J. 1995. Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination. Biometrika 82:711-732.
14. Hafner, M. S., P. D. Sudman, F. X. Villablanca, T. A. Spradling, J. W. Demastes, and S. A. Nadler. 1994. Disparate rates of molecular evolution in cospeciating hosts and parasites. Science 265:1087-1090.
15. Harshman, J., C. J. Huddleston, J. P. Bollback, T. J. Parsons, and M. J. Braun. 2003. True and false Gharials: a nuclear gene phylogeny of Crocodylia. Syst. Biol. 52:386-402.
16. Hasegawa, M., T. Yano, and H. Kishino. 1984. A new molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA and the evolution of Hominoids. Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B 60:95-98.
17. Hasegawa, M., H. Kishino, and T. Yano. 1985. Dating the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 22:160-174.
18. Hastings, W. K. 1970. Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika 57:97-109.
19. Hayasaka, K., T. Gojobori, and S. Horai. 1988. Molecular phylogeny and evolution of primate mitochondrial DNA. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:626-644.
20. Huelsenbeck, J. H., and B. Rannala. 1997. Phylogenetic methods come of age: testing hypotheses in an evolutionary context. Science 276:227-232.
21. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and F. Ronquist. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754-755.
22. Huelsenbeck, J. P., B. Larget, R. E. Miller, and F. Ronquist. 2002. Potential applications and pitfalls of Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 51:673-688.
23. Hurvich, C. M., and C-L. Tsai. 1989. Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 76:297-307.
24. Jackman, T. R., A. Larson, K. de Queiroz, and J. B. Losos. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships and tempo of early diversification in Anolis lizards. Syst. Biol. 48:254-285.
25. Jeffreys, H. 1961. Theory of Probability. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
26. Jukes, T. H., and C. R. Cantor. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. Pp. 21-123 in H. N. Munro, ed. Mammalian Protein Metabolism. Academic Press, New York.
27. Kass, R. E., and A. E. Raftery. 1995. Bayes factors and model uncertainty. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90:773-795.
28. Kimura, M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16:111-120.
29. -. 1981. Estimation of evolutionary distances between homologous nucleotide sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78:454-458.
30. Larget, B., and D. Simon. 1999. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:750-759.
31. Lavine, M., and M. J. Schervish. 1999. Bayes factors: what they are and what they are not. Am. Stat. 53:119-122.
32. Lebreton, J-D., K. P. Burnham, J. Clobert, and D. R. Anderson. 1992. Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecol. Monogr. 62:67-118.
33. Losos, J. B., T. R. Jackman, A. Larson, K. de Queiroz, and L. Rodrfguez-Schettino. 1998. Contingency and determinism in replicated adaptive radiations of island lizards. Science 279: 2115-2118.
34. Mathews, S., and M. J. Donoghue. 1999. The root of angiosperm phylogeny inferred from duplicate phytochrome genes. Science 286:947-950.
35. Metropolis, N., A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. W. Teller, and E. Teller. 1953. Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 21:1087-1091.
36. Muse, S. V., and B. S. Gaut. 1994. A likelihood approach for comparing synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates with application to the chloroplast genome. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:715-724.
37. Posada, D. 2003. Using Modeltest and PAUP* to select a model of nucleotide substitution. Pp. 6.5.1-6.5.14 in A. D. Baxevanis, et al., eds. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
38. Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
39. Raftery, A. E. 1996. Hypothesis testing and model selection. Pp. 163-187 in W. R. Gilks, S. Richardson, and D. J. Spiegelhalter, eds. Markov chain Monte Carlo in Practice. Chapman & Hall, London.
40. Ronquist, F., and J. P. Huelsenbeck. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572-1574.
41. Schöniger, M., and A. von Haeseler. 1994. A stochastic model and the evolution of autocorrelated DNA sequences. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 3:240-247.
42. Schwarz, G. 1978. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Stat. 6:461-464.
43. Suchard, M. A., R. E. Weiss, and J. S. Sinsheimer, 2001. Bayesian selection of continuous-time Markov chain evolutionary models. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:1001-1013.
44. Streelman, J. T., M. E. Alfaro, M. W. Westneat, D. R. Bellwood, and S. A. Karl. 2002. Evolutionary history of the parrotfishes: biogeography, ecomorphology, and comparative diversity. Evolution 56:961-971.
45. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
46. Tamura, K., and M. Nei. 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:512-526.
47. Tavaré, S. 1986. Some probabilistic and statistical problems on the analysis of DNA sequences. Pp. 57-86 in Lectures in Mathematics in the Life Sciences, vol. 17.
48. Tierney, L. 1994. Markov chains for exploring posterior distributions. Ann. Statist. 22:1701-1762.
49. Van Den Bussche, R. A., R. J. Baker, J. P. Huelsenbeck, and D. M. Hillis. 1998. Base compositional bias and phylogenetic analyses: A test of the "flying DNA" hypothesis. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 13:408-416.
50. Verdinelli, I., and L. Wasserman. 1995. Computing Bayes factors using a generalization of the Savage-Dickey density ratio. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90:614-618.
51. Yang, Z. 1994. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J. Mol. Evol. 39:306-314.
52. Yang, Z., R. Nielsen, N. Goldman, and A. Pedersen. 2000. Codon-substitution models for heterogeneous selection pressure at amino acid sites. Genetics 155:431-449.