Erratum to "How should gaps be treated in parsimony? A comparison of approaches using simulation" [Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 42 (2007) 817-826] (DOI:10.1016/j.ympev.2006.07.021);How should gaps be treated in parsimony? A comparison of approaches using simulation

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 817-826

  Ogden, T Heath ^a,b   Rosenberg, Michael S ^b  

^a Nucl Eng Idaho State University   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Clustal; DNA sequence alignment; Evolutionary distance; Gap character coding; Homology; Indel; Parsimony; Simulation; Tree reconstruction

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847312692     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.01.007     Document Type: Erratum

References (65)

1. Aagesen L., Petersen G., and Seberg O. Sequence length variation, indel costs, and congruence in sensitivity analysis. Cladistics 21 (2005) 15-30
2. Baldwin B.G., Sanderson M.J., Porter J.M., Wojciechowski M.F., Campbell C.S., and Donoghue M.J. The Its region of nuclear ribosomal dna-a valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Ann. MO Bot. Garden (1995) 247-277
3. Barriel V. Molecular phylogenies and how to code insertion/deletion events. Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences-Serie III 317 (1994) 693-701
4. Baum D.A., Sytsma K.J., and Hoch P.C. A phylogenetic analysis of Epilobium (Onagraceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA-sequences. Syst. Bot. 19 (1994) 363-388
5. Blanchette M., Green E.D., Miller W., and Haussler D. Reconstructing large regions of an ancestral mammalian genome in silico. Genome Res. 14 (2004) 2412-2423
6. Blanchette M., Kent W.J., Riemer C., Elnitski L., Smit A.F.A., Roskin K.M., Baertsch R., Rosenbloom K., Clawson H., Green E.D., Haussler D., and Miller W. Aligning multiple genomic sequences with the threaded blockset aligner. Genome Res. 14 (2004) 708-715
7. Consortium T.C.S.A. Initial sequence of the chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome. Nature 436 (2005) 69-87
8. Crandall K.A., and Fitzpatrick Jr. J.F. Crayfish molecular systematics: Using a combination of procedures to estimate phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 45 (1996) 1-26
9. Fleissner R., Metzler D., and Haeseler A. Simultaneous statistical multiple alignment and phylogeny reconstruction. Syst. Biol. 54 (2005) 548-561
10. Ford V.S., Thomas B.R., and Gottlieb L.D. The same duplication accounts for the PgiC genes in Clarkia xantiana and C. lewisii (Onagraceae). Syst. Bot. 20 (1995) 147-160
11. Freudenstein J.V., and Chase M.W. Analysis of mitochondrial nad1b-c intron sequences in Orchidaceae: utility and coding of length-change characters. Syst. Bot. 26 (2001) 643-657
12. Geiger D.L. Stretch coding and block coding: two new strategies to represent questionably aligned DNA sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 54 (2002) 191-199
13. Gillespie J.J., Yoder M.J., and Wharton R.A. Predicted secondary structure for 28S and 18S rRNA from Ichneumonoidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Apocrita): impact on sequence alignment and phylogeny estimation. J. Mol. Evol. 61 (2005) 114-137
14. Giribet G., and Wheeler W.C. On Gaps. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 13 (1999) 132-143
15. Golenberg E.M., Clegg M.T., Durbin M.L., Doebley J., and Ma D.P. Evolution of a noncoding region of the chloroplast genome. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2 (1993) 52-64
16. Gonzalez D. Codificación de las inserciones-deleciones en el análisis filogenético de secuencias genéticas. Boleti{dotless}́n de la Sociedad Botánica de México 59 (1996) 115-129
17. Graham S.W., Reeves P.A., Burns A.C.E., and Olmstead R.G. Microstructural changes in noncoding chloroplast DNA: interpretation, evolution, and utility of indels and inversions in basal angiosperm phylogenetic inference. Int. J. Plant Sci. 161 (2000) S83-S86
18. Hall B.G. Comparison of the accuracies of several phylogenetic methods using protein and DNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22 (2005) 792-802
19. Hasegawa M., Kishino K., and Yano T. Dating the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 22 (1985) 160-174
20. Hennequin S., Ebihara A., Ito M., Iwatsuki K., and Dubuisson J.-Y. Molecular systematics of the fern genus Hymenophyllum s.l. (Hymenophyllaceae) based on chloroplastic coding and noncoding regions. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 27 (2003) 283-301
21. Hibbett D.S., Fukumasanakai Y., Tsuneda A., and Donoghue M.J. Phylogenetic diversity in Shiitake inferred from nuclear ribosomal DNA-sequences. Mycologia 87 (1995) 618-638
22. Holmes I. Using evolutionary Expectation Maximization to estimate indel rates. Bioinformatics 21 (2005) 2294-2300
23. Holmes I., and Bruno W.J. Evolutionary HMMs: a Bayesian approach to multiple alignment. Bioinformatics 17 (2001) 803-820
24. Kawakita A., Sota T., Ascher J.S., Ito M., Tanaka H., and Kato M. Evolution and phylogenetic utility of alignment gaps within intron sequences of three nuclear genes in bumble bees (Bombus). Mol. Biol. Evol. 20 (2003) 87-92
25. Keightley P.D., and Johnson T. MCALIGN: stochastic alignment of noncoding DNA sequences based on an evolutionary model of sequence evolution. Genome Res. 14 (2004) 442-450
26. Kelchner S.A. The evolution of non-coding chloroplast DNA and its application in plant systematics. Ann. MO Bot. Garden 87 (2000) 482-498
27. Kelchner S.A. Group II introns as phylogenetic tools: structure, function, and evolutionary constraints. Am. J. Bot. 89 (2002) 1651-1669
28. Kjer K.M. Use of rRNA secondary structure in phylogenetic studies to identify homologous positions: an example of alignment and data presentation from the frogs. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 4 (1995) 314-330
29. Knudsen B., and Miyamoto M.M. Sequence alignments and pair Hidden Markov models using evolutionary history. J. Mol. Biol. 333 (2003) 453-460
30. Kretzer A., Li Y.N., Szaro T., and Bruns T.D. Internal transcribed spacer sequences from 38 recognized species of Suillus sensu lato: phylogenetic and taxonomic implications. Mycologia 88 (1996) 776-785
31. Li W.-H. Molecular Evolution (1997), Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA
32. Löytynoja A., and Goldman N. An algorithm for progressive multiple alignment of sequences with insertions. PNAS 102 (2005) 10557-10562
33. Lunter G., Miklos I., Drummond A., Jensen J., and Hein J. Bayesian coestimation of phylogeny and sequence alignment. BMC Bioinformatics 6 (2005) 83
34. Lutzoni F., Wagner P., Reeb V., and Zoller S. Integrating ambiguously aligned regions of DNA sequences in phylogenetic analyses without violating positional homology. Syst. Biol. 49 (2000) 628-651
35. Manos P.S., and Steele K.P. Phylogenetic analyses of "higher" Hamamelididae based on plastid sequence data. Am. J. Bot. 84 (1997) 1407-1419
36. McGuire G., Denham M.C., and Balding D.J. Models of sequence evolution for DNA sequences containing gaps. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18 (2001) 481-490
37. Metzler D. Statistical alignment based on fragment insertion and deletion models. Bioinformatics 19 (2003) 490-499
38. Miklos I., Lunter G.A., and Holmes I. A "Long Indel" model for evolutionary sequence alignment. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21 (2004) 529-540
39. Mitchison G.J. A probabilistic treatment of phylogeny and sequence alignment. J. Mol. Evol. 49 (1999) 11-22
40. Muller K. Incorporating information from length-mutational events into phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 38 (2006) 667-676
41. Ogden T.H., and Rosenberg M.S. Multiple sequence alignment accuracy and phylogenetic inference. Syst. Biol. 55 (2006) 314-328
42. Ogden T.H., and Whiting M. The problem with "the Paleoptera Problem": sense and sensitivity. Cladistics 19 (2003) 432-442
43. Ophir R., and Graur D. Patterns and rates of indel evolution in processed pseudogenes from humans and murids. Gene 205 (1997) 191-202
44. Petersen G., Seberg O., Aagesen L., and Frederiksen S. An empirical test of the treatment of indels during optimization alignment based on the phylogeny of the genus Secale (Poaceae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 30 (2004) 733-742
45. Pollard D., Bergman C., Stoye J., Celniker S., and Eisen M. Benchmarking tools for the alignment of functional noncoding DNA. BMC Bioinformatics 5 (2004) 6
46. Redelings B., and Suchard M. Joint Bayesian estimation of alignment and phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 54 (2005) 401-418
47. Rivas E. Evolutionary models for insertions and deletions in a probabilistic modeling framework. BMC Bioinformatics 6 (2005) 63
48. Robinson D.F., and Foulds L.R. Comparison of phylogenetic trees. Math. Biosci. 53 (1981) 131-147
49. Rosenberg M. Evolutionary distance estimation and fidelity of pair wise sequence alignment. BMC Bioinformatics 6 (2005) 102
50. Rosenberg M.S. Multiple sequence alignment accuracy and evolutionary distance estimation. BMC Bioinformatics 6 (2005) 278
51. Rosenberg M.S. MySSP: non-stationary evolutionary sequence simulation, including indels. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online 1 (2005) 51-53
52. Rosenberg M.S., and Kumar S. Heterogeneity of nucleotide frequencies among evolutionary lineages and phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20 (2003) 610-621
53. Simmons M.P., and Ochoterena H. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 49 (2000) 369-381
54. Simmons M.P., Ochoterena H., and Carr T.G. Incorporation, relative homoplasy, and effect of gap characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 50 (2001) 454-462
55. Sundstrom H., Webster M.T., and Ellegren H. Is the rate of insertion and deletion mutation male biased? Molecular evolutionary analysis of avian and primate sex chromosome sequences. Genetics 164 (2003) 259-268
56. Swofford, D.L., 1993. PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, version 3.1.1. Smithsonian Institution.
57. * and other methods), version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates.
58. Thompson J.D., Higgins D.G., and Gibson T.J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22 (1994) 4673-4680
59. Thorne J.L., Kishino H., and Felsenstein J. An evolutionary model for the maximum likelihood alignment of sequence evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 33 (1991) 114-124
60. Thorne J.L., Kishino H., and Felsenstein J. Inching toward reality: an improved likelihood model of sequence evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 34 (1992) 3-16
61. van Dijk M.A.M., Paradis E., Catzeflis F., and Jong W.W.D. The virtues of gaps: Xenarthran (Edentate) monophyly supported by a unique deletion in alpha A-crystallin. Syst. Biol. 48 (1999) 94-106
62. Vogler A.P., and DeSalle R. Evolution and phylogenetic information content of the ITS-1 region in the tiger beetle Cicindela dorsalis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11 (1994) 393-405
63. Wheeler W. Optimization alignment: the end of multiple sequence alignment in phylogenetics?. Cladistics 12 (1996) 1-9
64. Wheeler, W.C., Gladstein, D., De Laet, J., 2003. POY version 3.0.11. American Museum of Natural History.
65. Young N., and Healy J. GapCoder automates the use of indel characters in phylogenetic analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 4 (2003) 6