Modelling heterotachy in phylogenetic inference by reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 363, Issue 1512, 2008, Pages 3955-3964

  Pagel, Mark ^a   Meade, Andrew ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^b ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Covarion; Heterotachy; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Mixture model; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; MARKOV CHAIN; MODELING; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 57149106289     PISSN: 09628436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0178     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Akaike, H. 1974 A new look at the statistical model identification. Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on 19, 716-723.
2. Ane, C., Burleigh, J. G., McMahon, M. M. & Sanderson, M. J. 2005 Covarion structure in plastid genome evolution: a new statistical test. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 914-924.
3. Blackburne, B. P., Hay, A. J. & Goldstein, R. A. 2008 Changing selective pressures during antigenic changes in Human influenza H3. PLoS Pathog. 4, e1000058.
4. Boys, R. J. & Henderson, D. A. 2001 A comparison of reversible jump MCMC algorithms for DNA sequence segmentation using hidden Markov models. Comput. Sci. Stat. 33, 35-49.
5. Buchheim, M. A., Michalopulos, E. A. & Buchheim, J. A. 2001 Phylogeny of the Chlorophyceae with special reference to the Sphaeropleales: a study of 18S and 26S rDNA data. J. Phycol. 37, 819-835.
6. Felsenstein, J. 2004 Inferring phylogenies. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
7. Fitch, W. M. 1971 Rate of change of concomitantly variable codons. J. Mol. Evol. 1, 84-96.
8. Fitch, W. M. & Markowitz, E. 1970 An improved method for determining codon variability in a gene and its application to the rate of fixation of mutations in evolution. Biochem. Genet. 4, 579-593.
9. Galtier, N. 2001 Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analysis under a covarion-like model. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18, 866-873.
10. Gascuel, O. 2005 In Mathematics of evolution and phylogeny, (ed. O. Gascuel). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11. Gelman, A. 2003 Bayesian data analysis. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
12. Gilks, W. R., Richardson, S. & Spiegelhalter, D. J. 1996 Introducing Markov chain Monte Carlo. In Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice (eds W. R. Gilks, S. Richardson & D. J. Spiegelhalter), pp. 1-19. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall.
13. Green, P. J. 1995 Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination. Biometrika 82, 711-732.
14. Hastings, W. 1970 Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika 57, 97-109.
15. Huelsenbeck, J. P. 2002 Testing a covariotide model of DNA substitution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 698-707.
16. Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Nielsen, R. 1999 Variation in the pattern of nucleotide substitution across sites. J. Mol. Evol. 48, 86-93.
17. Huelsenbeck, J. P., Larget, B. & Alfaro, M. E. 2004 Bayesian phylogenetic model selection using reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1123-1133.
18. Kiontke, K., Gavin, N. P., Raynes, Y., Roehrig, C., Piano, F.& Fitch, D. H. A. 2004 Caenorhabditis phylogeny predicts convergence of hermaphroditism and extensive intron loss. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 9003-9008.
19. Kolaczkowski, B. & Thornton, J. 2004 Performance of maximum parsimony and likelihood phylogenetics when evolution is heterogeneous. Nature 431, 980-984.
20. Kolaczkowski, B. & Thornton, J. W. 2008 A mixed branch length model of heterotachy improves phylogenetic accuracy. Mol. Biol. Evol 25, 1054-1066.
21. Koshi, J. M. & Goldstein, R. A. 1998 Models of natural mutations including site heterogeneity. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 32, 289-295.
22. Lartillot, N. & Philippe, H. 2004 A Bayesian mixture model for across site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1095-1105.
23. Lopez, P., Casane, D. & Philippe, H. 2002 Heterotachy, an important process of protein evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 1-7.
24. Meade, A. & Pagel, M. 2008 A phylogenetic mixture model for heterotachy. In Evolutionary biology from concept to application (ed. P. Pontarotti), pp. 29-41. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag.
25. Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H. & Teller, E. 1953 Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087-1092.
26. Mueller, R. L., Macey, J. R., Jaekel, M., Wake, D. B. & Boore, J. L. 2004 Morphological homoplasy, life history evolution, and historical biogeography of plethodontid salamanders inferred from complete mitochondrial genomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 13 820-13 825.
27. Pagel, M. 1999 Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401, 877-884.
28. Pagel, M. & Meade, A. 2004 A phylogenetic mixture model for detecting pattern-heterogeneity in gene sequence or character-state data. Syst. Biol. 53, 571-581.
29. Pagel, M. & Meade, A. 2005 Mixture models in phylogenetic inference. In Mathematics of evolution and phylogeny (ed. O. Gascuel), pp. 121-142. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
30. Pagel, M. & Meade, A. 2006 Bayesian analysis of correlated evolution of discrete characters by reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo. Am. Nat. 167, 808-825.
31. Penny, D., McComish, B. J., Charleston, M. A. & Hendy, M. D. 2001 Mathematical elegance with biochemical realism: the covarion model of molecular evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 53, 711-723.
32. Philippe, H., Zhou, Y., Brinkmann, H., Rodrigue, N. & Delsuc, F. 2005 Heterotachy and long-branch attraction in phylogenetics. BMC Evol. Biol. 5, 50.
33. Piel, W. H., Donoghue, M., Sanderson, M. & Netherlands, L. U. T. 2002 TREEBASE: a database of phylogenetic information. Research report from the National Institute for Environmental Studies, pp. 41-47.
34. Rambaut, A. & Grassly, N. C. 1997 Seq-Gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. Comput. Appl. Biosci., 235-238.
35. Rydin, C., Kallersjo, M. & Friist, E. M. 2002 Seed plant relationships and the systematic position of Gnetales based on nuclear and chloroplast DNA: conflicting data, rooting problems, and the monophyly of conifers. Int. J. Plant Sci. 163, 197-214.
36. Schwarz, G. 1978 Estimating the dimensions of a model. Ann. Stat. 6, 461-464.
37. Specht, C. D. 2006 Systematics and evolution of the tropical monocot family Costaceae (Zingiberales): a multiple dataset approach. Syst. Bot. 31, 89-106.
38. Spencer, M., Susko, E. & Roger, A. J. 2005 Likelihood, parsimony, and heterogeneous evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. SMBE 22, 1161-1164.
39. Suchard, M. A., Weiss, R. E. & Sinsheimer, J. S. 2001 Bayesian selection of continuous-time Markov chain evolutionary models. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18, 1001-1013.
40. Swofford, D. L., Olsen, G. J., Waddell, P. J., Hillis, D. M., Moritz, C. & Mable, B. K. 1996 Phylogeny reconstruction. In Molecular Systematics, pp. 407-514. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
41. Taylor, M. S., Kai, C., Kawai, J., Carninci, P., Hayashizaki, Y. & Semple, C. A. 2006 Heterotachy in mammalian promoter evolution. PLoS Genet 2, e30.
42. Tuffley, C. & Steel, M. 1998 Modeling the covarion hypothesis of nucleotide substitution. Math. Biosci. 147, 63-91.
43. Venditti, C., Meade, A. & Pagel, M. 2008 Phylogenetic mixture models can reduce the node-density artifact. Syst. Biol. 58, 286-293.
44. Wang, H. C., Spencer, M., Susko, E. & Roger, A. J. 2007 Testing for covarion-like evolution in protein sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 294-305.
45. Yang, Z. 1994 Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J. Mol. Evol. 39, 306-314.
46. Zhou, Y., Rodrigue, N., Lartillot, N. & Philippe, H. 2007 Evaluation of models handling heterotachy in phylogenetic inference. BMC Evol. Biol. 7, 206.