Are transposition effects specific to letters?

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 63, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1603-1618

  García Orza, Javier ^a   Pera, Manuel ^b   Muñoz, Samara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÁLAGA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Letter position coding; Masked priming; Same different task; Transposition

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VISION; PROCEDURES;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VOCABULARY;

EID: 77954648653     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210903474278     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Acha, J., & Perea, M. (in press). Does kaniso activate CASINO? Input coding schemes and phonology in visual-word recognition. Experimental Psychology.
2. Baker, C. I., Liu, J., Wald, L. L., Kwong, K. K., Benner, T., & Kanwisher, N. (2007). Visual word processing and experiential origins of functional selectivity in human extrastriate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 104, 9087-9092.
3. Beringer, J. (1999). Experimental Run Time System (ERTS) (Version 3.28) [Computer software]. Frankfurt, Germany: Berisoft.
4. Carreiras, M., Vergara, M., & Perea, M. (2009). ERP correlates of transposed-letter priming effects: The role of vowels versus consonants. Psychophysiology, 46,34-42.
5. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
6. Davis, C. J. (1999). The self-organizing lexical acquisition andrecognition(SOLAR)modelofvisualwordrecognition. Dissertation Abstracts International, 62, 594.
7. Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Sigman, M., & Vinckier, F. (2005). The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 335-341.
8. Frankish, C., & Turner, E. (2007). SIGHT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 189-211.
9. Friedmann, N., & Gvion, A. (2001). Letter position dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 673-696.
10. Frost, R., Kugler, T., & Forster, K. I. (2005). Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: Principles of lexical organization in a given language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 31, 1293-1326.
11. Gómez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115, 577-601.
12. Goswami, U., & Ziegler, J. (2006). A developmental perspective on the neural code for written words. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(4), 142-143.
13. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
14. Grainger, J., Kiyonaga, K., & Holcomb, P. J. (2006). The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation. Psychological Science, 17, 1021-1026.
15. Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W.J. B. (2003). Modelling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), Mental lexicon: Some words to talk about words (pp. 1-23). Hauppauge, NY: NOVA Science Publishers.
16. Guerrera, C., & Forster, K. I. (2007). Masked form priming with extreme transposition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 117-142.
17. Johnson, R. L., Perea, M., & Rayner, K. (2007). Transposed-letter effects in reading: Evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 209-229.
18. Kinoshita, S., Castles, A., & Davis, C. (2009). The role of neighbourhood density in transposed-letter priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 506-526.
19. Kinoshita, S., & Norris, D. (2009). Transposed-letter priming of pre-lexical orthographic representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 35, 1-18.
20. Logan, G. D. (1996). The CODE theory of visual attention: An integration of space-based and object-based attention. Psychological Review, 103, 603-649.
21. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
22. McCloskey, M., & Rapp, B. (2000). A visually based developmental reading deficit. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 157-181.
23. Norris, D. (2006). The Bayesian reader: Explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. Psychological Review, 113, 327-357.
24. Norris, D., & Kinoshita, S. (2008). Perception as evidence accumulation and Bayesian inference: Insights from masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 434-455.
25. O'Connor, R. E., & Forster, K. I. (1981). Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 9, 78-92.
26. Pammer, K., Lavis, R., Cooper, C., Hansen, P. C., & Cornelissen, P. L. (2005). Symbol-string sensitivity and adult performance in lexical decision. Brain and Language, 94, 278-296.
27. Pammer, K., Lavis, R., Hansen, P. C., & Cornelissen, P. L. (2004). Symbol-string sensitivity and children's reading. Brain and Language, 89, 601-610.
28. Perea, M., & Acha, J. (2009). Does letter position coding depend on consonant/vowel status? Evidence with the masked priming technique. Acta Psychologica, 130, 127-137.
29. Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2006). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a prelexical phonological level? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1600-1613.
30. Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2008). Do orthotactics and phonology constrain the transposed-letter effect? Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 69-92.
31. Perea, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2008a). R34D1NG W0RD5 W1TH NUMB3R5. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 237-241.
32. Perea, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2008b). Transposed-letter priming effects for close vs. distant transpositions. Experimental Psychology, 55, 397-406.
33. Perea, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., Pollatsek, A., & Carreiras, M. (2009). Does the brain regularize digits and letters to the same extent? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1881-1888.
34. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003a). Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked associative priming. Memory & Cognition, 31, 829-841.
35. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003b). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: State of the art (pp. 97-120). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
36. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231-246.
37. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2007). La posición de las letras externas en el reconocimiento visual de palabras [The role of external letter positions in visual word recognition]. Psicothema, 19, 559-564.
38. Perea, M., & Pérez, E. (2009). Beyond alphabetic orthographies: The role of form and phonology in transposition effects in katakana. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 67-88.
39. Perea, M., Rosa, E., & Gómez, C. (2005). The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task. Perception and Psychophysics, 67, 301-314.
40. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP{thorn} model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114, 273-315.
41. Pollatsek, A., & Well, A. (1995). On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: A suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 785-794.
42. Ratinckx, E., Brysbaert, M., & Fias, W. (2005). Naming two-digit Arabic numerals: Evidence from masked priming studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 1150-1163.
43. Tydgat, I., & Grainger, J. (2009). Serial position effects in the identification of letters, digits and symbols. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 480-498.
44. Vinckier, F., Dehaene, S., Jobert, A., Dubus, J. P., Sigman, M., & Cohen, L. (2007). Hierarchical coding of letter strings in the ventral stream: Dissecting the inner organisation of the visual word-form system. Neuron, 55, 143-156.
45. Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 221-243.
46. Whitney, C., & Cornelissen, P. (2005). Letter-position encoding and dyslexia. Journal and Research in Reading, 28, 274-301.