The role of neighbourhood density in transposed-letter priming

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 506-526

  Kinoshita, Sachiko ^a   Castles, Anne ^a   Davis, Chris ^b  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Lexical decision task; Lexical tuning hypothesis; Neighbourhood density; Same different match task; Transposed letter (TL) priming

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; LETTER; LEXICAL DECISION TASK; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; NEIGHBOR JOINING METHOD; NEIGHBOURHOOD DENSITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRANSPOSED LETTER PRIMING; VERBAL MEMORY; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 70450284440     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: 14640732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960802289213     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 439-461.
2. Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R. (2002). The English Lexicon Project: A web-based repository of descriptive and behavioral measures for 40,481 English words and nonwords, available at http://elexicon.wustl.edu/.
3. Castles, A., Davis, C, Cavalot, P., & Forster, K. (2007). Tracking the acquisition of orthographic skills in developing readers: Masked priming effects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 97, 165-182.
4. Castles, A., Davis, C, & Letcher, T. (1999). Neighbourhood effects on masked form priming in developing readers. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 201-224.
5. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and Performance, VI (pp. 535-555). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
6. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C, Ziegler, J., & Langdon, R. (2001). DRC: Dual Route Cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
7. Davis, C. J. (1999). The self-organizing lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, Australia.
8. Davis, C. J. (2001). Match calculator. [Computer software available at http://www.pc.rhul.ac.uk/staff/c.davis/Utilities/]
9. Davis, C. J. (2003). Factors underlying masked priming effects in competitive network models of visual word recognition. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 121-170). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
10. Davis, C. J. (2006). Orthographic input coding: A review of behavioral evidence and current models. In S. Andrews (Ed.), From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 180-206). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
11. Davis, C. J., & Lupker, S. J. (2006). Masked inhibitory priming in English: Evidence for lexical inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 668-687.
12. Dunabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2007). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for morpho-orthographic decomposition. Cognition, 105, 691-703.
13. Forster, K. I. (1989). Basic issues in lexical processing. In W. D. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 75-107). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory and Cognition, 10, 680-698.
15. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments. and Computers, 35, 116-124.
16. Forster, K. I., Davis, C, Schoknecht, C, & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 211-251.
17. Forster, K. I., & Taft, M. (1994). Bodies, antibodies, and neighborhood density effects in masked form priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory and Cognition, 20, 844-863.
18. Grainger, J. (2008). Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction to the special issue on orthographic processes in reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1-35.
19. Grainger, J, Granier, J.-P., Farioli, F, & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2006). Letter position information in printed word perception: The relative-position priming constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 865-884.
20. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition. A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
21. Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), The mental lexicon (pp. 1-23). New York: Nova Science.
22. Guerrera, C, & Forster, K. I. (2008). Masked form priming with extreme transposition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 117-142.
23. Jacobs, A. M., & Grainger, J. (1992). Testing a semistochastic variant of the interactive activation model in different word recognition experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1174-1188.
24. Kinoshita, S. (2006). Additive and interactive effects of frequency and masked repetition in the lexical decision task. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 668-673.
25. Kinoshita, S., & Norris, D. (2008). Transposed-letter priming of pre-lexical orthographic representations. Paper submitted for publication.
26. Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
27. Lupker, S. J., Davis, C. J., & Perry, J. R. (2007). Masked priming of orthographic neighbors: An examination of the lexical competition assumption. Paper presented at the 48th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society. Longbeach, CA.
28. Masson, M. E. J., & Bodner, G. E. (2003). A retrospective view of masked priming: Toward a unified account of masked and long-term repetition priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 57-96). New York: Psychology Press.
29. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
30. Norris, D. (2006). The Bayesian Reader: Explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. Psychological Review, 113, 327-357.
31. Norris, D., & Kinoshita, S. (in press). Perception as evidence accumulation and Bayesian inference: Insights from masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
32. Norris, D., Kinoshita, S., & van Casteren, M. (2008). A stimulus sampling theory of letter identity and order. Paper submitted for publication.
33. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003a). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 97-120). New York: Psychology Press.
34. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003b). Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming. Memory and Cognition, 31, 829-841.
35. th Annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Minneapolis, MN
36. Perea, M., & Rosa, E. (2000). Repetition and form priming interact with neighborhood density at a brief stimulus-onset asynchrony Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 668-677.
37. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59-108.
38. Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333-367.
39. Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 221-243.
40. Whitney, C, & Cornelissen, P. (2005). Letter-position encoding and dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 28, 274-301.
41. Whitney, C, & Cornelissen, P. (2008). SERIOL reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 143-164.
42. Yarkoni, T, Balota, D., & Yap, M. (in press). Moving beyond Coltheart's N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review.