The CODE theory of visual attention: an integration of space-based and object-based attention

Psychological Review

Volumn 103, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 603-649

  Logan, Gordon D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REVIEW;

ATTENTION; HUMANS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

EID: 0030266134     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.4.603     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Allport, D. A. (1980). Attention and performance. In G. Claxton (Ed.), Cognitive psychology (pp. 112-153). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
2. Andersen, G. J. (1990). Focused attention in three-dimensional space. Perception and Psychophysics, 47, 112-120.
3. Ashby, F. G., Prinzmetal, W., Ivry, R., & Maddox, W. T. (1996). A formal theory of feature binding in object perception. Psychological Review: 103, 165-192.
4. Attneave, F. (1960). In defense of homunculi. In W. A. Rosenblith (Ed.), Sensory communication (pp. 777-782). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Banks, W. P., & Prinzmetal, W. (1976). Configurational effects in visual information processing. Perception and Psychophysics. 19, 361-367.
6. Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1992). Visual parsing and response competition: The effects of grouping. Perception and Psychophysics. 51, 145-162.
7. Ullman, S. (1984). Visual routines. Cognition, 18, 97-159.
8. Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. W. J. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549-586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Vandaloise, C. (1991). Spatial prepositions: A case study from French. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.