The role of external letter positions in visual word recognition;La posición de las letras externas en el reconocimiento visual de palabras

Psicothema

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 559-564

  Perea, Manuel ^a   Lupker, Stephen J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; RECOGNITION; VISION; VISUAL FIELD;

HUMANS; LANGUAGE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VOCABULARY;

EID: 35348958933     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Alija, M., y Cuetos, F. (2006). Efectos de las variables léxico semánticas en el reconocimiento visual de palabras. Psicothema, 18, 485-491.
2. Álvarez, C.J., de Vega, M., y Carreiras, M. (1998). La sílaba como unidad de activación léxica en la lectura de palabras trisílabas. Psicothema, 10, 371-386.
3. Caramazza, A., Chialant, D., Capasso, D., y Miceli, G. (2000). Separable processing of consonants and vowels. Nature, 403, 428-430.
4. Carreiras, M., Álvarez, C.J., y de Vega, M. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 766-780.
5. Chambers, S.M. (1979). Letter and order information in lexical access. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 225-241.
6. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Ziegler, J., y Langdon, R. (2001). DRC: A Dual-Route Cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
7. Davis, C.J. (1999). The Self-Organising Lexical Acquisition and Recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
8. Davis, C.J., y Perea, M. (2005). BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguists indices in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 665-671.
9. Forster, K.I., y Forster, J.C. (2003), DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 35, 116-124.
10. Forster, K.I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., y Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 39A, 211-251.
11. Garcia, J.N., y González, L. (2006). Diferencias en la conciencia morfoló gica, la escritura y el lenguaje en función del desarrollo y el nivel educativo del niño. Psicothema, 18, 171-179.
12. Gómez, P., Ratcliff, R., y Perea, M. (2007). A model of letter position coding: The overlap model. Enviado para publicación.
13. Grainger, J., y Jacobs, A.M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
14. Grainger, J., y Whitney, C. (2004). Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 58-59.
15. Humphreys, G.W., Evett, L.J., y Quinlan, PT. (1990). Orthographic processing in visual word identification. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 517-560.
16. Johnson, R.L., Perea, M., y Rayner, K. (2007). Transposed-letter effects in reading: Evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 209-229.
17. Lee, H.-W., Rayner, K., y Pollatsek, A. (2001). The relative contribution of consonants and vowels to word identification during reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 189-205.
18. Lima, S.D., e Inhoff, A.W. (1985). Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word-initial letter sequence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 272-285.
19. Marín, J., Pagán, A., y Avilés, A. (2005). Anagram solution as a function of status of orthographic cues and structure of lexical representations. Póster presentado en el VII Simposio of Psicolingüística, Valencia.
20. McClelland, J.L., y Rumelhart, D.E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
21. O'Connor, R.E., y Forster, K.I. (1981). Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 9, 78-92.
22. Perea, M. (1998). Orthographic neighbours are not all equal: Evidence using an identification technique. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 77-90.
23. Perea, M., y Carreiras, M. (1998). Effects of syllable frequency and syllable neighborhood frequency in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 134-144.
24. Perea, M., y Carreiras, M. (2006a). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a prelexical phonological level? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1600-1613.
25. Perea, M., y Carreiras, M. (2006b). Do transposed-letter effects occur across lexemes? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 418-422.
26. Perea, M., y Fraga, I. (2006). Transposed-letter and laterality effects in lexical decision. Brain and Language, 97, 102-109.
27. Perea, M., y Lupker, S.J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231-246.
28. Perea, M., Gotor, A., y Nácher, M.J. (1997). Efectos de facilitación asociativa vs semántica en la tarea de decisión léxica. Psicothema, 9, 509-517.
29. Perea, M., Rosa, E., y Gómez, C. (2005). The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task. Perception and Psychophysics, 67, 301-314.
30. Rayner, K., White, S., Johnson, R.L., y Liversedge, S. (2006). Raeding wrods with jubmled lettres: There's a cost. Psychological Science, 17, 192-193.
31. Schoonbaert, S., y Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333-367.