Transposed-letter priming effects for close versus distant transpositions

Experimental Psychology

Volumn 55, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 384-393

  Perea, Manuel ^a   Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni ^b   Carreiras, Manuel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE LA LAGUNA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Masked priming; Perceptual similarity; Word recognition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; PERCEPTION; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VISION;

DISTANCE PERCEPTION; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VOCABULARY;

EID: 57849083137     PISSN: 16183169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.55.6.384     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Acha, J., & Perea, M. (2008). The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: Evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 245-264.
2. Christianson, K., Johnson, R. L., & Rayner, K. (2005). Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 1327-1339.
3. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Ziegler, J., & Langdon, R. (2001). DRC: A Dual-Route Cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
4. Davis, C. J. (1999). The Self-Organising Lexical Acquisition and Recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. University of. New South Wales: Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
5. Davis, C. J., & Perea, M. (2005). BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 665-671.
6. Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2007). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for ortho-morphological decomposition. Cognition, 105, 691-703.
7. Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 21.1-251.
8. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116-124.
9. Gómez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (in press). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115.
10. Grainger, J. (2008). Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1-35.
11. Grainger, J., Granier, J. P., Farioli, F., Van Assche, E., & van Heuven, W. (2006). Letter position information and printed word perception: The relative-position priming constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 865-884.
12. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
13. Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), The mental lexicon (pp. 1-23). New York: Nova Science.
14. Grainger, J., & Whitney, C. (2004). Does the huamn mind raed wrods as a wlohe? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 58-59.
15. Guerrera, C., & Forster, K. (2008). Masked form priming with extreme transposition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 117-142.
16. Humphreys, G. W., Evett, L. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (1990). Early orthographic processing in visual word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 517-560.
17. Johnson, R. L. (2007). The flexibility of letter coding: Nonadjacent letter transposition effects in the parafovea. In R. van Gompel, M. Fisher, W. Murray, & R. L. Hill (Eds.). Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 425-440). Oxford: Elsevier.
18. Johnson, R. L., Perea, M., & Rayner, K. (2007). Transposed-letter effects in reading: Evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 209-229.
19. Lupker, S. J., Perea, M., & Davis, C. J. (2005). An investigation of the nature of input coding and lexical selection: Evidence from the masked priming paradigm. Paper presented at the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour and Cognitive Science, Montréal, Canada.
20. Lupker, S. J., Perea, M., & Davis, C. J. (2008). Transposed letter priming effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 93-116.
21. Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2006a). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a prelexical phonological level? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1600-1613.
22. Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2006b). Do transposed-letter effects occur across lexeme boundaries? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 418-422.
23. Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2006c). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a syllable level? Experimental Psychology, 53, 308-315.
24. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003a). Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming. Memory & Cognition, 31, 829-841.
25. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003b). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.). Masked priming: State of the art (pp. 97-120). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
26. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231-246.
27. Rayner, K., White, S., Johnson, R. L., & Liversedge, S. (2006). Raeding wrods with jubmled lettres: There's a cost. Psychological Science, 17, 192-193.
28. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89, 60-94.
29. Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333-367.
30. Welvaert, M., Farioli, F., & Grainger, J. (2008). Graded effects of number of inserted letters in superset priming. Experimental Psychology, 55, 54-63.
31. Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 221-243.
32. Whitney, C. (in press). A comparison of the SERIOL and SOLAR theories of letter-position encoding. Brain and Language.
33. Whitney, C., & Cornelissen, P. L. (2008). SERIOL reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 143-164.