Barrier compression and its contribution to both classical and quantum mechanical aspects of enzyme catalysis

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 98, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 121-128

  Hay, Sam ^a   Johannissen, Linus O ^a,b   Sutcliffe, Michael J ^a,b   Scrutton, Nigel S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINE DEHYDROGENASE;

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; COMPRESSION; ENERGY YIELD; ENZYME MECHANISM; PERMEABILITY BARRIER; PROTON TRANSPORT; QUANTUM MECHANICS;

EID: 74049100280     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: 15420086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.09.045     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Benkovic, S. J., and S. Hammes-Schiffer. 2003. A perspective on enzyme catalysis. Science. 301:1196-1202.
2. Garcia-Viloca, M., J. Gao, ..., D. G. Truhlar. 2004. How enzymes work: analysis by modern rate theory and computer simulations. Science. 303:186-195.
3. Gladstone, S., K. J. Laidler, and H. Eyring. 1941. The Theory of Rate Processes. McGraw-Hill, New York.
4. Nagel, Z. D., and J. P. Klinman. 2006. Tunneling and dynamics in enzymatic hydride transfer. Chem. Rev. 106:3095-3118.
5. Antoniou, D., J. Basner, ..., S. D. Schwartz. 2006. Computational and theoretical methods to explore the relation between enzyme dynamics and catalysis. Chem. Rev. 106:3170-3187.
6. Marcus, R. A., and N. Sutin. 1985. Electron transfers in chemistry and biology. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 811:265-322.
7. Hay, S., C. Pudney, ..., N. S. Scrutton. 2008. Atomistic insight into the origin of the temperature-dependence of kinetic isotope effects and H-tunneling in enzyme systems is revealed through combined experimental studies and biomolecular simulation. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 36:16-21.
8. Truhlar, D. G., J. L. Gao, ..., J. Villà. 2002. The incorporation of quantum effects in enzyme kinetics modeling. Acc. Chem. Res. 35:341-349.
9. Hammes-Schiffer, S. 2006. Hydrogen tunneling and protein motion in enzyme reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 39:93-100.
10. Warshel, A., P. K. Sharma, ..., M. H. Olsson. 2006. Electrostatic basis for enzyme catalysis. Chem. Rev. 106:3210-3235.
11. Kohen, A., R. Cannio, ..., J. P. Klinman. 1999. Enzyme dynamics and hydrogen tunneling in a thermophilic alcohol dehydrogenase. Nature. 399:496-499.
12. Maglia, G., and R. K. Allemann. 2003. Evidence for environmentally coupled hydrogen tunneling during dihydrofolate reductase catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125:13372-13373.
13. Basran, J., R. J. Harris, ..., N. S. Scrutton. 2003. H-tunneling in the multiple H-transfers of the catalytic cycle of morphinone reductase and in the reductive half-reaction of the homologous pentaerythritol tetranitrate reductase. J. Biol. Chem. 278:43973-43982.
14. Hothi, P., S. Hay, ..., N. S. Scrutton. 2008. Driving force analysis of proton tunneling across a reactivity series for an enzyme-substrate complex. ChemBioChem. 9:2839-2845.
15. Liu, H., and A. Warshel. 2007. Origin of the temperature dependence of isotope effects in enzymatic reactions: the case of dihydrofolate reductase. J. Phys. Chem. B. 111:7852-7861.
16. Mincer, J. S., and S. D. Schwartz. 2004. Rate-promoting vibrations and coupled hydrogen-electron transfer reactions in the condensed phase: a model for enzymatic catalysis. J. Chem. Phys. 120:7755-7760.
17. Cui, Q. A., and M. Karplus. 2002. Promoting modes and demoting modes in enzyme-catalyzed proton transfer reactions: a study of models and realistic systems. J. Phys. Chem. B. 106:7927-7947.
18. Knapp, M. J., K. Rickert, and J. P. Klinman. 2002. Temperature-dependent isotope effects in soybean lipoxygenase-1: correlating hydrogen tunneling with protein dynamics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124:3865-3874.
19. Johannissen, L. O., S. Hay, ..., M. J. Sutcliffe. 2007. Proton tunneling in aromatic amine dehydrogenase is driven by a short-range sub-picosecond promoting vibration: consistency of simulation and theory with experiment. J. Phys. Chem. B. 111:2631-2638.
20. Hay, S., and N. S. Scrutton. 2008. Incorporation of hydrostatic pressure into models of hydrogen tunneling highlights a role for pressure-modulated promoting vibrations. Biochemistry. 47:9880-9887.
21. Hatcher, E., A. V. Soudackov, and S. Hammes-Schiffer. 2004. Proton-coupled electron transfer in soybean lipoxygenase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126:5763-5775.
22. Antoniou, D., and S. D. Schwartz. 1997. Large kinetic isotope effects in enzymatic proton transfer and the role of substrate oscillations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:12360-12365.
23. Kuznetsov, A. M., and J. Ulstrup. 1999. Proton and hydrogen atom tunneling in hydrolytic and redox enzyme catalysis. Can. J. Chem. 77:1085-1096.
24. Borgis, D., and J. T. Hynes. 1996. Curve crossing formulation for proton transfer reactions in solution. J. Phys. Chem. 100:1118-1128.
25. Saen-Oon, S., S. Quaytman-Machleder, ..., S. D. Schwartz. 2008. Atomic detail of chemical transformation at the transition state of an enzymatic reaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 105:16543-16548.
26. Caratzoulas, S., and S. D. Schwartz. 2001. A computational method to discover the existence of promoting vibrations for chemical reactions in condensed phases. J. Chem. Phys. 114:2910-2918.
27. Caratzoulas, S., J. S. Mincer, and S. D. Schwartz. 2002. Identification of a protein-promoting vibration in the reaction catalyzed by horse liver alcohol dehydrogenase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124:3270-3276.
28. Olsson, M. H., W. W. Parson, and A. Warshel. 2006. Dynamical contributions to enzyme catalysis: critical tests of a popular hypothesis. Chem. Rev. 106:1737-1756.
29. Hay, S., C. Pudney, ..., N. S. Scrutton. 2009. Barrier compression enhances an enzymatic H-transfer reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48:1452-1454.
30. Hay, S., M. J. Sutcliffe, and N. S. Scrutton. 2007. Promoting motions in enzyme catalysis probed by pressure studies of kinetic isotope effects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 104:507-512.
31. Pang, J., S. Hay, ..., M. J. Sutcliffe. 2008. Deep tunneling dominates the biologically important hydride transfer reaction from NADH to FMN in morphinone reductase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130:7092-7097.
32. Miller, W. H. 1986. Semiclassical methods in chemical physics. Science. 233:171-177.
33. Basran, J., S. Patel, ..., N. S. Scrutton. 2001. Importance of barrier shape in enzyme-catalyzed reactions. Vibrationally assisted hydrogen tunneling in tryptophan tryptophylquinone-dependent amine dehydrogenases. J. Biol. Chem. 276:6234-6242.
34. Pu, J. Z., J. L. Gao, and D. G. Truhlar. 2006. Multidimensional tunneling, recrossing, and the transmission coefficient for enzymatic reactions. Chem. Rev. 106:3140-3169.
35. Johannissen, L. O., N. S. Scrutton, and M. J. Sutcliffe. 2008. The enzyme aromatic amine dehydrogenase induces a substrate conformation crucial for promoting vibration that significantly reduces the effective potential energy barrier to proton transfer. J.R. Soc. Interface. 5 (Suppl 3):S225-S232.
36. Govindaraj, S., E. Eisenstein, ..., S. L. Edwards. 1994. Aromatic amine dehydrogenase, a second tryptophan tryptophylquinone enzyme. J. Bacteriol. 176:2922-2929.
37. Sutcliffe, M. J., L. Masgrau, ..., N. S. Scrutton. 2006. Hydrogen tunneling in enzyme-catalyzed H-transfer reactions: flavoprotein and quinoprotein systems. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 361:1375-1386.
38. Masgrau, L., A. Roujeinikova, ..., D. Leys. 2006. Atomic description of an enzyme reaction dominated by proton tunneling. Science. 312:237-241.
39. Masgrau, L., K. E. Ranaghan, ..., M. J. Sutcliffe. 2007. Tunneling and classical paths for proton transfer in an enzyme reaction dominated by tunneling: oxidation of tryptamine by aromatic amine dehydrogenase. J. Phys. Chem. B. 111:3032-3047.
40. Barroso, M., L. G. Arnaut, and S. J. Formosinho. 2009. The role of reaction energy and hydrogen bonding in the reaction path of enzymatic proton transfers. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 22:254-263.
41. Bell, R. 1980. The Tunnel Effect in Chemistry. Chapman and Hall, New York.
42. Dybala-Defratyka, A., P. Paneth, and D. G. Truhlar. 2009. Quantum catalysis in enzymes. In Quantum Tunneling in Enzyme-Catalyzed Reactions. R. K. Allemann and N. S. Scrutton, editors. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK. 36-78.
43. Frisch, M. J., G. W. Trucks, ..., J. A. Pople. 2003. Gaussian 03. Gaussian, Wallingford, CT.
44. Huskey, W. P., and R. L. Schowen. 1983. Reaction-coordinate tunneling in hydride-transfer reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 105:5704-5706.
45. Kikuta, Y., T. Ishimoto, and U. Nagashima. 2008. Geometrical and kinetic isotope effects on R-H(D)R-... type intramolecular hydrogen bonds (R = CH2, NH, and O) using a multi-component molecular orbital method. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 81:820-825.
46. Doering, W. E., and X. Zhao. 2006. Effect on kinetics by deuterium in the 1,5-hydrogen shift of a cisoid-locked 1,3(Z)-pentadiene, 2-methyl-10- methylenebicyclo[4.4.0]dec-1-ene: evidence for tunneling? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128:9080-9085.
47. Benderskii, V. A., D. E. Makarov, and C. A. Wight. 1994. Chemical dynamics at low temperatures. Adv. Chem. Phys. 88:1-385.
48. Aqvist, J., and A. Warshel. 1993. Simulation of enzyme-reactions using valence-bond force-fields and other hybrid quantum-classical approaches. Chem. Rev. 93:2523-2544.
49. Olsson, M. H., P. E. Siegbahn, and A. Warshel. 2004. Simulations of the large kinetic isotope effect andthe temperature dependence of the hydrogen atom transfer in lipoxygenase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126:2820-2828.
50. Meyer, M. P., D. R. Tomchick, and J. P. Klinman. 2008. Enzyme structure and dynamics affect hydrogen tunneling: the impact of a remote side chain (I553) in soybean lipoxygenase-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 105:1146-1151.
51. Meyer, M. P., and J. P. Klinman. 2005. Modeling temperature dependent kinetic isotope effects for hydrogen transfer in a series of soybean lipoxygenase mutants: the effect of anharmonicity upon transfer distance. Chem. Phys. 319:283-296.