A three-level analysis of collaborative learning in dual-interaction spaces

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 289-317

  Lonchamp, Jacques ^a  

^a LORIA   (France)

Author keywords

Dual interaction spaces; Generic analysis approach; Generic environment; Interaction analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350074654     PISSN: 15561607     EISSN: 15561615     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11412-009-9068-6     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Alonso, M., Py, D., & Lemeunier, T. (2008). A learning environment for object-oriented modeling, supporting metacognitive regulations. In Proceedings 8th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 69-73). IEEE Computer Society.
2. Amelsvoort, M. A. A., Andriessen, J. E. B., & Kanselaar, G. (2008). How students structure and relate argumentative knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1293-1313.
3. Arvaja, M., Salovaara, H., Häkkinen, P., & Järvelä, S. (2007). Combining individual and group-level perspectives for studying collaborative knowledge construction in context. Learning and Instruction, 17, 448-459.
4. Avouris N., Margaritis M., & Komis V. (2004). Modelling interaction during small-group synchronous problem-solving activities: The Synergo approach. 2nd International Workshop on Designing Computational Models of Collaborative Learning Interaction, 7th Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 13-18). Maceio, Brazil.
5. Baghaei, N., & Mitrovic, A. (2006). A constraint-based collaborative environment for learning UML class diagrams. In M. Ikeda, K. Ashley & T.-W. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems 2006, LNCS 4053 (pp. 176-186). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag.
6. Baker, M., & Lund, K. (1996). Flexibly structuring the interaction in a CSCL environment. In P. Brna, A. Paiva & J. Self (Eds.), Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 401-407). Lisbon, Portugal: Edicôes Colibri.
7. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning.
8. Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., Kirschner, P. A., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2007). The analysis of negotiation of common ground in CSCL. Learning and Instruction, 17, 427-435.
9. Çakir, M. P., Zemel, A., & Stahl, G. (2007). The organization of collaborative math problem solving activities across dual interaction spaces. In C. Hmelo-Silver & A. O'Donnell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 107-109). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Clark, H., & Schaefer, E. (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13, 259-294.
11. Constantino-Gonzales, M. A., & Suthers, D. (2001). Coaching collaboration by comparing solutions and tracking participation. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), European perspectives on computer-supported collaborative learning, proceedings of the first European conference on computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 173-180). Maastricht, NL: Universiteit Maastricht.
12. Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2008). A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(2), 105-122.
13. De Chiara, R., Di Matteo, A., Manno, I., & Scarano, V. (2007). CoFFEE: Cooperative Face2Face Educational Environment. In Proceedings of the 3 rd International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom 2007). New York, NY.
14. De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & van Keer, H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers & Education, 46, 6-28.
15. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1-19). Oxford, U.K: Elsevier.
16. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL? (pp. 61-91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.
17. Dimitracopoulou, A., & Komis, V. (2005). Design principles for the support of modelling and collaboration in a technology-based learning environment. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning, 15(1/2), 30-55.
18. Erkens, G., & Janssen, J. (2008). Automatic coding of communication in collaboration protocols. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(4), 447-470.
19. Farnham, S., Chesley, H. R., McGhee, D. E., Kawal, R., & Landau, J. (2000). Structured online interactions: Improving the decision-making of small discussion groups. In Proceedings of ACM Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2000 (pp. 299-308). New York, NY: ACM Press.
20. Fidas, C., Komis, V., Avouris, N., & Dimitracopoulou, A. (2002). Collaborative problem solving using an open modeling environment. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community, Proceedings of International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning CSCL 2002 (pp. 654-655). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Fischer, G. (2003). Meta-design-beyond user-centered and participatory design. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI 2003), Crete, Greece, 88-92.
22. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23.
23. Glassner, A., & Schwarz, B. (2005). The role of floor control and of ontology in argumentative activities with discussion-based tools. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers & T. Chan (Eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning 2005: The next 10 years (pp. 170-179). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Gogoulou, A., Gouli, E., Grigoriadou, M., & Samarakou, M. (2005). ACT: A web-based adaptive communication tool. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers & T. W. Chan (Eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning 2005: The next 10 years (pp. 180-189). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers (pp. 117-136). London: Springer Verlag.
26. Hernández-Leo, D., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., Dimitriadis, Y., Bote-Lorenzo, M. L., Jorrín-Abellán, I. M., & Villasclaras-Fernández, E. D. (2005). Reusing IMS-LD formalized best practices in collaborative learning structuring. Advanced Technology for Learning, 2(3), 223-232.
27. Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
28. Jermann, P. (2004). Computer support for interaction regulation in collaborative problem-solving. Geneva: Dissertation, University of Geneva.
29. Jones, C., Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., & Lindström, B. (2006). A relational, indirect, meso-level approach to CSCL design in the next decade. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(1), 35-56.
30. Klausmeier, H. J. (1992). Concept learning and concept teaching. Educational Psychologist, 27(3), 267-286.
31. Kumpulainen, K., & Mutanen, M. (1999). The situated dynamics of peer group interaction: An introduction to an analytic framework. Learning and Instruction, 9, 449-474.
32. Landsman, S., & Alterman, R. (2003). Building Groupware on THYME. Technical Report CS-03-234. Waltham, MA: Brandeis University.
33. Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
34. Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education. New York: Cambridge Education.
35. Lonchamp, J. (2006). Supporting synchronous collaborative learning: a generic, multi-dimensional model. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(2), 247-276.
36. Lonchamp, J. (2007a). Floor control in complex CSCL synchronous environments, In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technology (pp. 397-402). Barcelona, Spain.
37. Lonchamp, J. (2007b). Linking conversation and task objects in complex synchronous CSCL environments. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technology (pp. 281-288). Barcelona, Spain.
38. Lonchamp, J. (2008). Interaction analysis supporting participants' self-regulation in a generic CSCL system. In P. Dillenbourg & M. Specht (Eds.), Times of convergence, Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, LNCS 5192 (pp. 262-273). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer Verlag.
39. ndACM International Conference on Object-oriented Programming Systems, Languages and Applications (pp. 147-155). Orlando, Florida.
40. Morris, C. (1938). Foundations of the theory of signs. Chicago University Press.
41. Mühlenbrock, M. (2001). Action-based collaboration analysis for group learning. Amsterdam: Dissertations in Artificial Intelligence, IOS.
42. Mühlpfordt, M., & Stahl, G. (2007). The integration of synchronous communication across dual interaction spaces. In C. Hmelo-Silver & A. O'Donnell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 525-534). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. Nonaka, I., & Takeushi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation (pp. 61-85). New York: Oxford University.
44. Nosofsky, R. (1988). Exemplar-based accounts of relations between classification, recognition, and typicality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 700-708.
45. Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2002). Epistemological foundations for CSCL: A comparison of three models of innovative knowledge communities. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL community, Proceedings of International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning CSCL 2002 (pp. 24-32). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
46. Pfister, H.-R., & Mühlpfordt, M. (2002). Supporting discourse in a synchronous learning environment: The learning protocol approach. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL community, Proceedings of International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning CSCL 2002 (pp. 581-589). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
47. Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures. New York: The Viking.
48. Pinkwart, N. (2003). A plug-in architecture for graph based collaborative modeling systems. In U. Hoppe, F. Verdejo & J. Kay (Eds.), Shaping the future of learning through intelligent technologies: Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 535-536). Amsterdam, NL: IOS.
49. Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge: towards a post critical philosophy. London: Routledge.
50. Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R., et al. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 337-386.
51. Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 273-304.
52. Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 192-233.
53. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14, 51-70.
54. Schegloff, E. A. (2006). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
55. Schrire, S. (2006). Knowledge building in asynchronous discussion groups: Going beyond quantitative analysis. Computers & Education, 46, 49-70.
56. Soller, A., Wiebe, J., & Lesgold, A. (2002). A machine learning approach to assessing knowledge sharing during collaborative learning activities. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL community, Proceedings of International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning CSCL 2002 (pp. 128-137). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
57. Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
58. Stahl, G. (2007). Social practices of group cognition in virtual math teams. In S. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, & R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning in social practices. ICT and new artifacts-transformation of social and cultural practices: Pergamon.
59. Strijbos, J.-W., & Stahl, G. (2007). Methodological issues in developing a multi-dimensional coding procedure for small-group chat communication. Learning and Instruction, 17, 394-404.
60. Strijbos, J.-W., Martens, R. L., Prins, F. J., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2006). Content analysis: What are they talking about? Computers & Education, 46, 29-48.
61. Suthers, D. D. (2006). A qualitative analysis of collaborative knowledge construction through shared representations. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(2), 1-28.
62. Suthers, D. D., Dwyer, N., Vatrapu, R., & Medina, R. (2007). An abstract transcript notation for analyzing interactional construction of meaning in online learning. In Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on the Systems Science (CD-ROM). IEEE Computer Society Press.
63. Topping, K. (1998). Peer-assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276.
64. Trausan-Matu, S., Stahl, G., & Sarmiento, J. (2006). Polyphonic Support for Collaborative Learning. In Y. Dimitriadis, I. Zigurs, & E. Gómez-Sánchez (Eds.) Groupware: Design, Implementation, and Use, 12th International Workshop CRIWG 2006 (pp.132-139), LNCS 4154, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag.
65. van Joolingen, W., de Jong, T., Lazonder, A., Savelsbergh, E., & Manlove, S. (2005). Co-Lab: research and development of an online learning environment for collaborative scientific discovery learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 671-688.
66. Webb, N. M. (1982). Student interaction and learning in small groups. Review of Educational Research, 52(3), 421-445.
67. Wee, J. D., & Looi, C. K (2007). Meaning-making paths as a unit of analysis in synchronous chat environments: Application of the collaboration interaction model. In Proceedings of the Redesigning Pedagogy: Culture, Knowledge and Understanding Conference, Singapore, May 2007.
68. Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33(1), 1-30.
69. Zumbach, J., Muehlenbrock, M., Jansen, M., Reimann, P., & Hoppe, H.-U. (2002). Multidimensional tracking in virtual learning teams. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL community, Proceedings of International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning CSCL 2002 (pp. 650-651). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.