The role of floor control and of ontology in argumentative activities with discussion-based tools

Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005: The Next 10 Years - Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005, CSCL 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 170-179

  Glassner, Amnon ^a   Schwarz, Baruch B ^b  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

(a)synchronous e discussions; Argumentation; Knowledge building

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; FLOORS; GRAPHIC METHODS;

(A)SYNCHRONOUS E-DISCUSSIONS; ARGUMENTATION; FLOOR CONTROL; GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATIONS; KNOWLEDGE BUILDING; TURN-TAKING;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 34748887074     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1149293.1149315     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Andriessen, J., Erkens, G., van de Laak, C., Peters, N., & Coirier, N. (2003). Argumentation as negotiation in electronic collaborative writing. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, and D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning environments (pp. 227-260). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2. Baker, M. (2003). Computer-mediated argumentative interactions for the co-elaboration of scientific notions. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, and D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer- Supported Collaborative Learning environments (pp. 47-78). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
3. Bell, P. (1997). Using argument representations to make thinking visible for individuals and groups. In R. Hall, N. Miyake, N. Enyedy (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCL -97: The Second International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. 10-19). Toronto. University of Toronto Press.
4. de Vries, E. Lund, C., & Baker, M. (2002). Computer-mediated epistemic dialogue: explanation and argumentation as vehicles for understanding scientific notions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 63-103. (Pubitemid 36618810)
5. Edelson, D. C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 105-121. (Pubitemid 36618811)
6. Pilkington, R., & Walker, A. (2003). Using CMC to develop argumentation skills in children with a 'literacy deficit-. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, and D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning environments (pp. 144-175). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
7. Rogoff, B. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process. In D. S. Kuhn, R. (Eds) (Ed.), Cognition, perception and language (W. Damon (Ed) 5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 679-744). New York: Wiley.
8. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 185-213.
9. Schwarz, B. B., Neuman, Y. & Gil, J., & Ilya, M. (2003). Construction of collective and individual knowledge in argumentative activity: An empirical study. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 221-258.
10. Schwarz, B. B., & Glassner, A. (2003). The blind and the paralytic: fostering argumentation in everyday and scientific issues. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, and D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning environments (pp. 227-260). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11. Schwarz, B. B., & Glassner, A. (in press). Designing CSCL argumentative environments for broadening and deepening understanding of the space of debate. In R. Säljö (Ed.), Information and Communication Technology and the Transformation of Learning Practices. Pergamon.
12. Suthers, D. D. (2002). Representational guidance for collaborative inquiry. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, and D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning environments (pp. 27-46). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
13. Suthers, D. D., & Weiner, A. (1995). Groupware for developing critical discussion skills. http://wwwcscl95. indiana.edu/suthers.html.
14. van Bruggen, J. M., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2002). External representation of argumentation in CSCL and the management of cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 12, 121-138. (Pubitemid 39659599)
15. van Bruggen, J. M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2003). Designing external representations to support solving wicked problems. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, and D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning environments (pp. 177-204). Kluwer Academic Publishers.