Emerging perspectives on the structure and function of attitude strength

European Review of Social Psychology

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 165-201

  Eaton, Asia A ^a   Majka, Elizabeth A ^a   Visser, Penny S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Attitude strength; Attitudes; Persuasion; Social networks; Social power

Indexed keywords

EID: 68049114622     PISSN: 10463283     EISSN: 1479277X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10463280802383791     Document Type: Article

References (121)

1. Abelson, R. P., 1988. Conviction. American Psychologist, 43: 267–275.
2. Armitage, C. J., and Connor, M., 2000. Attitudinal ambivalence: A test of three key hypotheses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26: 1421–1432.
3. Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., and Burrows, L., 1996. Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 71: 230–244.
4. Bass, A. R., and Rosen, H., 1969. Some potential moderator variables in attitude research. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 29: 331–348.
5. Bassili, J. N., 1996. Meta-judgemental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71: 637–653.
6. Bassili, J. N., and Roy, J. P., 1998. On the representation of strong and weak attitudes about policy in memory. Political Psychology, 19: 669–681.
7. Berger, I. E., 1992. The nature of attitude accessibility and attitude confidence: A triangulated experiment. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1: 103–123.
8. Biddle, B. J., Bank, B. J., and Slavings, R. L., 1987. Norms, preferences, identities and retention decisions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50: 322–337.
9. Boninger, D. S., Krosnick, J. A., and Berent, M. K., 1995a. Origins of attitude importance: Self-interest, social identification, and value relevance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68: 61–80.
10. Boninger, D. S., Krosnick, J. A., Berent, M. K., and Fabrigar, L. R., 1995b. “ The causes and consequences of attitude importance ”. In Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences, Edited by: Petty, R. E., and Krosnick, J. A., Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
11. Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., Valle, C., Rucker, D. D., and Becerra, A., 2007. The effects of message recipients' power before and after persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93: 1040–1053.
12. Budd, R. J., 1986. Predicting cigarette use: The need to incorporate measures of salience in the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16: 633–685.
13. Burt, R. S., 1980. Models of network structure. Annual Review of Sociology, 6: 79–141.
14. Byrne, D. E., London, O., and Griffitt, W., 1968. The effect of topic importance and attitude similarity–dissimilarity on attraction in an intrastranger design. Psychonomic Science, 11: 303–304.
15. Chaiken, S., 1987. “ The heuristic model of persuasion ”. In Social influence: The Ontario Symposium, Edited by: Zanna, M. P., Olson, J. M., and Herman, C. P., Vol. 5, 3–9. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
16. Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A. Y., and Bargh, J. A., 2001. Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 80: 173–187.
17. Clore, G. L., and Baldridge, B., 1968. Interpersonal attraction: The role of agreement and topic interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9: 340–346.
18. Dasgupta, N., and Greenwald, A. G., 2001. On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81: 800–814.
19. Deutsch, M., and Gerard, H. B., 1955. A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51: 629–636.
20. Eagly, A. H., and Chaiken, S., 1993. The psychology of attitudes, Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
21. Eagly, A. H., Kulesa, P., Brannon, L. A., Shaw, K., and Hutson-Comeaux, S., 2000. Why counterattitudinal messages are as memorable as proattitudinal messages: The importance of active defense against attack. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26: 1392–1408.
22. Eaton, A., 2005. Social power and attitude change across the life course, Unpublished master's thesis, University of Chicago.
23. Eaton, A. A., and Visser, P. S., The effects of social power on susceptibility to attitude change. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association. Chicago, IL, USA. May.
24. Eaton, A. A., and Visser, P. S., How high-power role norms affect resistance to persuasion: A biased-processing account. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association. Chicago. May.
25. Emerson, R., 1962. Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27: 31–41.
26. Fazio, R. H., 2000. “ Accessible attitudes as tools for object appraisal: Their costs and benefits ”. In Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes, Edited by: Maio, G., and Olson, J., 1–36. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
27. Fazio, R. H., Chen, J., McDonel, E. C., and Sherman, S. J., 1982. Attitude accessibility, attitude–behavior consistency, and the strength of the object–evaluation association. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18: 339–357.
28. Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., and Kardes, F. R., 1986. On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50: 229–238.
29. Festinger, L., 1950. Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57: 271–282.
30. Festinger, L., Schacter, S., and Back, K. W., 1950. Social pressures in informal groups, New York: Harper.
31. Fine, B. J., 1957. Conclusion-drawing, communicator credibility, and anxiety as factors in opinion change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 5: 369–374.
32. Fiske, S. T., 1993. Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48: 621–628.
33. Fiske, S. T., and Dépret, E., 1996. “ Control interdependence and power: Understanding social cognition in its social context ”. In European review of social psychology, Edited by: Stroebe, W., and Hewstone, M., Vol. 7, 31–61. New York: Wiley.
34. Fleming, M. A., and Petty, R. E., 2000. “ Identity and persuasion: An elaboration likelihood approach ”. In Attitudes, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership, Edited by: Terry, D. J., and Hogg, M. A., 171–199. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
35. French, J. R. P., and Raven, B., 1959. “ The bases of social power ”. In Studies in social power, Edited by: Cartwright, D., Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
36. Goodwin, S. A., Gubin, A., Fiske, S. T., and Yzerbyt, V. Y., 2000. Power can bias impression processes: Stereotyping subordinates by default and by design. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3: 227–256.
37. Gorn, G. J., 1975. The effects of personal involvement, communication discrepancy, and source prestige on reactions to communications on separatism. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 7: 369–386.
38. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., and Schwartz, J. L. K., 1998. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74: 1464–1480.
39. Gross, S. R., Holtz, R., and Miller, N., 1995. “ Attitude certainty ”. In Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences, Edited by: Petty, R. E., and Krosnick, J. A., 215–245. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
40. Haddock, G., Rothman, A. J., Reber, R., and Schwarz, N., 1999. Forming judgements of attitude certainty, intensity, and importance: The role of subjective experiences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25: 771–782.
41. Haddock, G., Rothman, A. J., and Schwarz, N., 1996. Are (some) reports of attitude strength context dependent. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science Revue Canadienne des Sciences du comportement, 28: 313–316.
42. Haslam, S. A., McGarty, C., and Turner, J. C., 1996. “ Salient group memberships and persuasion: The role of social identity in the validation of beliefs ”. In What's social about social cognition? Research on shared cognition in small groups, Edited by: Nye, J. L., and Brower, A. M., 29–56. London: Sage Publications.
43. Hodson, G., Maio, G. R., and Esses, V. M., 2001. The role of attitudinal ambivalence in susceptibility to consensus information. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23 (3): 197–205.
44. Hogg, M. A., 2006. “ Social identity theory ”. In Contemporary social psychological theories, Edited by: Burke, P. J., 111–136. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
45. Hogg, M. A., and Reid, S. A., 2006. Social identity, self-categorisation, and the communication of group norms. Communication Theory, 16: 7–30.
46. Hogg, M. A., and Smith, J. R., 2007. Attitudes in social context: A social identity perspective. European Review of Social Psychology, 18: 89–131.
47. Holland, R. W., Verplanken, B., and van Knippenberg, A., 2002. On the nature of attitude–behavior relations: The strong guide, the weak follow. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32: 869–876.
48. Hu, L., and Bentler, P. M., 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6 (1): 1–55.
49. Huckfeldt, R., Morehouse Mendez, J., and Osborn, T., 2004. Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: The political consequences of heterogeneous networks. Political Psychology, 25: 65–95.
50. Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., and Anderson, C., 2003. Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110: 265–284.
51. Kipnis, D., 1976. The powerholders, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52. Krosnick, J. A., 1988a. The role of attitude importance in social evaluation: A study of policy preferences, presidential candidate evaluations, and voting behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55: 196–210.
53. Krosnick, J. A., 1988b. Attitude importance and attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24: 240–255.
54. Krosnick, J. A., 1989. Attitude importance and attitude accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15: 297–308.
55. Krosnick, J. A., Boninger, D. S., Chuang, Y. C., Berent, M. K., and Carnot, C. G., 1993. Attitude strength: One construct or many related constructs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65: 1132–1151.
56. Krosnick, J. A., Jarvis, B., Strathman, A., and Petty, R. E., 1994. Relations among dimensions of attitude strength: Insights from induced variable models, Columbus, OH: Ohio State University. Unpublished manuscript
57. Lavine, H., Huff, J. W., Wagner, S. H., and Sweeney, D., 1998. The moderating influence of attitude strength on the susceptibility to context effects in attitude surveys. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75: 359–373.
58. Levitan, L. C., Kwong, J., and Visser, P. S., 2006. The social network composition's impact on individuals' attitude strength: How is our attitude strength affected as we jump from one branch of our social network to another?, Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago.
59. Levitan, L. C., and Visser, P. S., 2007. Social network composition and attitude strength: Exploring the dynamics within newly formed social networks, Manuscript submitted for publication.
60. Levitan, L. C., and Visser, P. S., 2008. The impact of the social context on resistance to persuasion: Effortful versus effortless responses to counter-attitudinal information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44: 640–649.
61. Mackie, D. M., Gastardo-Conaco, M. C., and Skelly, J. J., 1992. Knowledge of the advocated position and the processing of in-group and out-group persuasive messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18: 145–151.
62. Mackie, D. M., and Queller, S., 2000. “ The impact of group membership on persuasion: Revisiting “who says what to whom with what effect?”. In Attitudes, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership, Edited by: Terry, D. J., and Hogg, M. A., 135–155. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
63. Mackie, D. M., Worth, L. T., and Asuncion, A. G., 1990. Processing of persuasive in-group messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58: 812–822.
64. Martin, R., and Hewstone, M., 2001. “ Conformity and independence in groups: Majorities and minorities ”. In Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes, Edited by: Hogg, M. A., and Tindale, R. S., Vol. 1, 209–234. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
65. Martin, R., and Hewstone, M., 2003. Majority versus minority influence: When, not whether, source status instigates heuristic or systematic processing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33: 313–330.
66. Martin, R., Hewstone, M., and Martin, P. Y., 2003. Resistance to persuasive messages as a function of majority and minority source status. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39: 585–593.
67. McGarty, C., Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., and Haslam, S. A., 1993. The creation of uncertainty in the influence process: The roles of stimulus information and disagreement with similar others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23: 17–38.
68. McGrath, C., Haslam, S. A., Hutchinson, K. J., and Turner, J. C., 1994. The effects of salient group memberships on persuasion. Small Group Research, 25: 267–293.
69. Mutz, D. C., 2002. The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46: 838–855.
70. Overbeck, J. R., and Park, B., 2001. When power does not corrupt: Superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80: 549–565.
71. Overbeck, J. R., and Park, B., 2006. Powerful perceivers, powerless objects: Flexibility of powerholders' social attention. Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99 (2): 227–243.
72. Parker, H. A., Perry, R. W., and Gillespie, D. F., 1974. Prolegomenon to a theory of attitude–behavior relationships. Pakistan Journal of Psychology, 7: 21–39.
73. Petrocelli, J. V., Tormala, Z. L., and Rucker, D. D., 2007. Unpacking attitude certainty: Attitude clarity and attitude correctness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92: 30–41.
74. Petty, R. E., and Cacioppo, J. T., 1981. Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches, Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
75. Petty, R. E., and Cacioppo, J. T., 1986. Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change, New York: Springer-Verlag.
76. Petty R., E. Krosnick J., A. 1995 Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc
77. Petty, R. E., and Wegener, D. T., 1999. “ The Elaboration Likelihood Model: Current status and controversies ”. In Dual process theories in social psychology, Edited by: Chaiken, S., and Trope, Y., 41–72. New York: Guilford Press.
78. Pomerantz, E. M., Chaiken, S., and Tordesillas, R. S., 1995. Attitude strength and resistance processes. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 69: 408–419.
79. 2 Model: The influence of attitudes and attitude strength on consideration and choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 30: 574–587.
80. Priester, J. R., and Petty, R. E., 2001. Extending the bases of subjective attitudinal ambivalence: Interpersonal and intrapersonal antecedents of evaluative tension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80: 19–34.
81. Prislin, R., 1996. Attitude stability and attitude strength: One is enough to make it stable. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26: 447–477.
82. Prislin, R., Brewer, M., and Wilson, D. J., 2002. Changing majority and minority positions within a group versus an aggregate. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28: 640–647.
83. Prislin, R., Limbert, W. M., and Bauer, E., 2000. From majority to minority and vice versa: The asymmetrical effects of losing and gaining majority position within a group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79: 385–397.
84. Rasinski, K. A., Visser, P. S., Zagatsky, M., and Rickett, E. M., 2005. Using implicit goal priming to improve the quality of self-report data. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41: 321–327.
85. Roese, N. J., and Olson, J. M., 1994. Attitude importance as a function of repeated attitude expression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30: 39–51.
86. Rokeach, M., and Kliejunas, P., 1972. Behavior as a function of attitude-toward-object and attitude-toward-situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22: 194–201.
87. Rudman, L. A., 2004. Sources of implicit attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13: 80–83.
88. Rudman, L. A., and Goodwin, S. A., 2004. Gender differences in automatic ingroup bias: Why do women like women more than men like men. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87: 494–509.
89. Schachter, S., 1951. Deviation, rejection, and communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46: 190–207.
90. Smith, J. R., Terry, D. J., Crosier, T., and Duck, J. M., 2005. The importance of the relevance of the issue to the group in attitude-intention consistency. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27: 163–170.
91. Terry, D. J., and Hogg, M. A., 1996. Group norms and the attitude–behavior relationships: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22: 776–793.
92. Terry, D. J., Hogg, M. A., and White, K. M., 1999. The theory of planned behavior: Self-identity, social identity and group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38: 225–244.
93. Terry, D. J., Hogg, M. A., and White, K. M., 2000. “ Attitude–behavior relations: Social identity and group membership ”. In Attitudes, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership, Edited by: Terry, D. J., and Hogg, M. A., 167–193. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
94. Theodorakis, Y., 1994. Planned behavior, attitude strength, role identity, and the prediction of exercise behavior. The Sports Psychologist, 8: 149–165.
95. Thibaut, J. W., and and Kelley, H. H., 1959. The social psychology of groups, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
96. Thompson, M. T., and Zanna, M. P., 1995. The conflicted individual: Personality-based and domain-specific antecedents of ambivalent social attitudes. Journal of Personality, 63: 259–288.
97. Trafimow, D., 1994. Predicting intentions to use a condom from perceptions of normative pressure and confidence in those perceptions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24: 2151–2163.
98. Turner, J. C., 1991. Social influence, Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
99. Turner, J. C., 1999. “ Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorisation theories ”. In Social identity, Edited by: Ellemers, N., Spears, R., and Doosje, B., 6–34. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
100. Turner, J. C., 2005. Explaining the nature of power: A three-process theory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35: 1–22.
101. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., and Wetherell, M. S., 1987. Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorisation theory, Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
102. van Knippenberg, D., 1999. “ Social identity and persuasion: Reconsidering the role of group. membership ”. In Social identity and social cognition, Edited by: Abrams, D., and Hogg, M. A., 315–331. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
103. van Knippenberg, D., 2000. “ Group norms, prototypicality, and persuasion ”. In Attitudes, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership, Edited by: Terry, D. J., and Hogg, M. A., 157–170. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
104. van Knippenberg, D., Lossie, N., and Wilke, H., 1994. In group prototypicality and persuasion: Determinants of heuristic and systematic message processing. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33: 289–300.
105. van Knippenberg, D., and Wilke, H., 1992. Prototypicality of arguments and conformity to ingroup norms. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22: 141–155.
106. Verplanken, B., 1989. Involvement and need for cognition as moderators of beliefs-attitude-intention consistency. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28: 115–122.
107. Verplanken, B., 1991. Persuasive communication of risk information: A test of cue versus message processing effects in a field experiment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17: 188–193.
108. Visser, P., 1998. Assessing the structure and function of attitude strength: Insights from a new approach, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University.
109. Visser, P. S., Bizer, G. Y., and Krosnick, J. A., 2006. Exploring the latent structure of strength-related attitude attributes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38: 1–67.
110. Visser, P. S., Krosnick, J. A., and Norris, C. J., 2007. Attitude importance and attitude-relevant knowledge: Motivator and enabler, Manuscript submitted for publication.
111. Visser, P. S., Krosnick, J. A., and Simmons, J. P., 2003. Distinguishing the cognitive and behavioral consequences of attitude importance and certainty: A new approach to testing the common-factor hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39: 118–141.
112. Visser, P. S., and Mirabile, R. R., 2004. Attitudes in the social context: The impact of social network composition on individual-level attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87: 779–795.
113. Wasserman, S., and Faust, K., 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
114. White, K. M, Hogg, M. A., and Terry, D. I., 2002. Improving attitude–behavior correspondence through exposure to normative support from a salient ingroup. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24: 91–103.
115. Wilder, D. A., 1990. Some determinants of the persuasive power of in-groups and outgroups: Organisation of information and attribution of independence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59: 1202–1213.
116. Wood, W., 1982. Retrieval of attitude-relevant information from memory: Effects on susceptibility to persuasion and on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42: 798–810.
117. Wood, W., 2000. Attitude change: Persuasion and social influence. Annual Review of Psychology, 51: 539–570.
118. Wood, W., and Kallgren, C. A., 1988. Communicator attributes and persuasion: Recipients' access to attitude-relevant information in memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4: 172–182.
119. Wood, W., Kallgren, C. A., and Preisler, R. M., 1985. Access to attitude-relevant information in memory as a determinant of persuasion: The role of message attributes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21: 73–85.
120. Wood, W., Rhodes, N., and Biek, M., 1995. “ Working knowledge and attitude strength: An information-processing analysis ”. In Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences, Edited by: Petty, R. E., and Krosnick, J. A., 283–313. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
121. Zuwerink, J. R., and Devine, P. G., 1996. Attitude importance and resistance to persuasion: It's not just the thought that counts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70: 931–944.