Conformity and Independence in Groups: Majorities and Minorities

Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 209-234

  Martin, Robin ^a   Hewstone, Miles ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Advertisements; Conformity; Group behavior; Research traditions; Theoretical developments

Indexed keywords

EID: 84954088795     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470998458.ch9     Document Type: Chapter

References (133)

1. Aebischer, V., Hewstone, M., & Henderson, M. (1984). Minority influence and musical preference: Innovation by conversion not coercion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 23-33.
2. Allen, V. L. (1965). Situational factors in conformity. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 133-175). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3. Allen, V. L. (1975). Social support for nonconformity. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 1-43). New York: Academic Press.
4. Alvaro, E. M., & Crano, W. D. (1997). Indirect minority influence: Evidence for leniency in source evaluation and counterargumentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 949-964.
5. Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzhow (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men (pp. 177-190). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press.
6. Baker, S. M., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Majority and minority influence: Source-position imbalance as a determinant of message scrutiny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 5-19.
7. Bohner, G., Erb, H. P., Reinhard, M. A., & Frank, E. (1996). Distinctiveness information in minority and majority influence: An attributional analysis and preliminary data. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 27-46.
8. Bohner, G., Frank, S., & Erb, H. P. (1998). Heuristic processing of distinctiveness information in minority and majority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 855-860.
9. Brandstätter, V., Ellmers, N., Gaviria, E., Giosue, F., Huguet, P., Kroon, M., Morchain, P., Pujal, M., Rubini, M., Mugny, G., & Pérez, J. A. (1991). Indirect majority and minority influence: An exploratory study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 199-211.
10. Butera, F., & Mugny, G. (1995). Conflict between incompetencies and influence of a lowexpertise source in hypothesis testing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 457-462.
11. Butera, F., Mugny, G., Legrenzi, P., & Pérez, J. A. (1996). Majority and minority influence, task representation and inductive reasoning. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 123-136.
12. Campbell, J. D., Tesser, A., & Fairley, P. J. (1986). Conformity and attention to the stimulus: Some temporal and contextual dynamics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 315-324.
13. Chaiken, S., & Stangor, C. (1987). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 575-630.
14. Clark, R. D., III (1998). Minority influence: The role of the rate of majority defection and persuasive arguments. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 787-796.
15. Clark, R. D., III, & Maass, A. (1988a). Social categorization in minority influence: The case of homosexuality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 347-364.
16. Clark, R. D., III, & Maass, A. (1988b). The role of social categorization and perceived source credibility in minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 381-394.
17. Crano, W. D., & Alvaro, E. M. (1998). The context/comparison model of social influence: Mechanisms, structure, and linkages that underlie indirect attitude change. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 175-202). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
18. Crano, W. D., & Chen, X. (1998). The leniency contract and persistence of majority and minority influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1437-1450.
19. Crano, W. D., & Hannula-Bral, K. A. (1994). Context/categorization model of social influence: Minority and majority influence in the formation of a novel response norm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 247-276.
20. Cramer, D. (1975). A critical note on two studies of minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 257-260.
21. Crutchfield, R. S. (1955). Conformity and character. American Psychologist, 10, 191-198.
22. David, B., & Turner, J. C. (1996). Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion: Is being a member of the outgroup an advantage? British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 179-199.
23. David, B., & Turner, J. C. (1999). Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion: The ingroup minority in intragroup and intergroup contexts. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 115-134.
24. de Dreu, C. K. W., & de Vries, N. K. (1993). Numerical support, information processing, and attitude change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 647-663.
25. de Dreu, C. K. W., & de Vries, N. K. (1996). Differential processing and attitude change following majority and minority arguments. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 77-90.
26. de Dreu, C. K. W., & de Vries, N. K. (1997). Minority dissent in organizations. In C. K. W. de Dreu & E. Van de Vliert (Eds.), Using conflict in organizations (pp. 72-86). London: Sage.
27. de Dreu, C. K. W., de Vries, N. K., Gordijn, E., & Schuurman, M. (1999). Convergent and divergent processing of majority and minority arguments: Effects on focal and related attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 329-348.
28. De Vries, N. K., & de Dreu, C. K. W. (in press), Group consensus and innovation. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
29. De Vries, N. K., de Dreu, C. K. W., Gordijn, E., & Schuurman, M. (1996). Majority and minority influence: A dual interpretation. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 145-172). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
30. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. G. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influence upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.
31. Doms, M. (1983). The minority influence effect: An alternative approach. In W. Doise & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Current issues in European social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 1-31). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32. Doms, M., & van Avermaet, E. (1980). Majority influence, minority influence, and conversion behavior: A replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 283-292.
33. Easterbrook, J. A. (1959). The effect of emotion on the utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychological Review, 66, 183-201.
34. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
35. Erb, H. P., Bohner, G., Schmaelzle, K., & Rank, S. (1998). Beyond conflict and discrepancy: Cognitive bias in minority and majority influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 620-633.
36. Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271-282.
37. Fischer, L. J. (1997). Process d'influence dans la situation de médiation et modèle de la conversion minoritaire. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 35, 12-29.
38. Gerard, H. B., Wilhelmy, R. A., & Connolley, E. S. (1968). Conformity and group size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 79-82.
39. Guillon, M., & Personnaz, B. (1983). Analyse de la dynamique des représentations des conflits minoritaire et majoritaire. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 3, 65-87.
40. Hart, J. W., Stasson, M. F., & Karau, S. J. (1999). Effects of source expertise and physical distance on minority influence. Group Dynamics, 3, 81-92.
41. Hollander, E. P. (1960). Competence and conformity in the acceptance of influence. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 361-365.
42. Jones, E. E., & Gerard, H. B. (1967). Foundations of social psychology. New York: Wiley.
43. Joule, R. V., Mugny, G., & Pérez, J. A. (1988). When a compliance without pressure strategy fails due to a minority dissenter. A case of "behavioral conversion." European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 531-535.
44. Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 192-241). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
45. Kelly, C. (1990). Social identity and levels of influence: When a political minority fails. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 289-301.
46. Kelvin, P. (1979). Review of Moscovici (1976) "Social influence and social change." European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 441-446.
47. Kent, M. V. (1994). Conformity. In A. P. Hare & H. H. Blumberg (Eds.), Small group research: A handbook (pp. 107-137). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
48. Kruglanski, A. W., & Mackie, D. M. (1990). Majority and minority influence: A judgmental process analysis. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 229-261). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
49. Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36, 343-356.
50. Latané, B. (1996). Strength from weakness: The fate of opinion minorities in spatially distributed groups. In E. H. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior, Vol. 1: Consensual action by small groups (pp. 193-219). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Latané, B., Liu, J. H., Nowak, A., & Bonevento, M. (1995). Distance matters: Physical space and social impact. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 795-805.
52. Latané, B., & Wolf, S. (1981). The social impact of majorities and minorities. Psychological Review, 88, 438-453.
53. Legrenzi, P., Butera, F., Mugny, G., & Pérez, J. A. (1991). Majority and minority influence in inductive reasoning: A preliminary study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 359- 363.
54. Levine, J. M. (1980). Reaction to opinion deviance in small groups. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (pp. 375-429). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Levine, J. M., & Russo, E. M. (1987). Majority and minority influence. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Group processes: Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 13-54). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
56. Maass, A., & Clark, R. D., III (1983). Internalization versus compliance: Differential processes underlying minority influence and conformity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 197-215.
57. Maass, A., & Clark, R. D., III (1984). Hidden impact of minorities: Fifteen years of minority influence research. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 428-450.
58. Maass, A., Clark, R. D., III, & Haberkorn, G. (1982). The effects of differential ascribed category membership and norms on minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 89-104.
59. Maass, A., West, S., & Cialdini, R. B. (1987). Minority influence and conversion. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Group processes: Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 55-79). Newbury Park, CA.: Sage.
60. Mackie, D. M. (1987). Systematic and nonsystematic processing of majority and minority persuasive communications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 41-52.
61. Mackie, D. M., & Hunter, S. B. (1999). Majority and minority influence: The interactions of social identity and social cognition mediators. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 332-353). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
62. Maheswaran, D., & Chaiken, S. (1991). Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: Effects of incongruent information on processing and judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 13-25.
63. Martin, R. (1988a). Ingroup and outgroup minorities: Differential impact upon public and private responses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 39-52.
64. Martin, R. (1988b). Minority influence and social categorization: A replication. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 369-373.
65. Martin, R. (1995). Majority and minority influence using the afterimage paradigm: A replication with an unambiguous blue slide. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 373-381.
66. Martin, R. (1996). Minority influence and argument generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 91-103.
67. Martin, R. (1998). Majority and minority influence using the afterimage paradigm: A series of attempted replications. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 1-26.
68. Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (1999). Minority influence and optimal problem solving. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 825-832.
69. Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (2000). Majority versus minority influence: When, not whether, source status instigates heuristic or systematic processing. Manuscript under review.
70. Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (in press). Afterthoughts on afterimages: A review of the color perception paradigms used in majority and minority influence. In N. K. de Vries & C. K. W. de Dreu (Eds.), Group consensus and innovation. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
71. McLeod, P. L., Baron, R. S., Marti, M. W., & Yoon, K. (1997). The eyes have it: Minority influence in face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 706-718.
72. Moscovici, S. (1975). Reply to a critical note on two studies of minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 261-263.
73. Moscovici, S. (1976). Social influence and social change. London: Academic Press.
74. Moscovici, S. (1979). Rejoinder to Kelvin's (1979) review of Moscovici (1976) "Social influence and social change." European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 446-451.
75. Moscovici, S. (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 209-239). New York: Academic Press.
76. Moscovici, S. (1985). Social influence and conformity. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 3rd Ed., pp. 347-412). New York: Random House.
77. Moscovici, S., & Faucheux, C. (1972). Social influence, conformity bias, and the study of active minorities. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 149-202). New York: Academic Press.
78. Moscovici, S., Lage, E., & Naffrechoux (1969). Influence of a consistent minority on the responses of a majority in a color perception task. Sociometry, 32, 365-380.
79. Moscovici, S., & Mugny, G. (1983). Minority influence. In P. B. Paulhus (Ed.), Basic group processes (pp. 41-64). New York: Springer-Verlag.
80. Moscovici, S., Mugny, G., & Papastamou, S. (1981). "Sleeper effect" et/ou effet minoritaire? Etude théorique et expérimentale de l'influence sociale à retardement. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 1, 199-221.
81. Moscovici, S., Mugny, G., & van Avermaet, E. (Eds.). (1984). Perspectives on minority influence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
82. Moscovici, S., & Nemeth, C. (1974). Social influence II: Minority influence. In C. Nemeth (Ed.), Social psychology: Classic and contemporary integrations (pp. 217-249). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
83. Moscovici, S., & Personnaz, B. (1980). Studies in social influence: V. Minority influence and conversion behavior in a perceptual task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 270-282.
84. Moscovici, S., & Personnaz, B. (1986). Studies on latent influence using the spectrometer method I: Psychologization effect upon conversion by a minority and majority. European Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 345-360.
85. Moscovici, S., & Personnaz, B. (1991). Studies in social influence VI: Is Lenin orange or red? Imagery and social influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 101-118.
86. Moskowitz, G. B. (1996). The mediational effect of attributions and information processing in minority social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 47-66.
87. Mucchi-Faina, A., Maass, A., & Volpato, C. (1991). Social influence: The role of originality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 183-197.
88. Mugny, G. (1976). Quelle influence majoritaire? Quelle influence minoritaire? Revue Suisse de Psychologie Pure et Appliqué, 35, 225-268.
89. Mugny, G. (1982). The power of minorities. London: Academic Press.
90. Mugny, G. (1984). The influence of minorities: Ten years later. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension: European developments in social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 498-517). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press/Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.
91. Mugny, G., Butera, F., Sanchez-Mazas, M., & Pérez, J. A. (1995). Judgments in conflict: The conflict elaboration theory of social influence. In B. Boothe, R. Hirsig, A. Helminger, B. Meier, & R. Volkart (Eds.), Perception-evaluation-interpretation (pp. 160-168). Göttingen: Hogrefe and Huber.
92. Mugny, G., Kaiser, C., & Papastamou, S. (1983). Influence minoritaire, identification et relations entre groupes: Etude expérimentale autour d'une votation. Cahiers de Psychologie Sociale, 19, 1-30.
93. Mugny, G., & Pérez, J. (1991). The social psychology of minority influence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
94. Mullen, B. (1983). Operationalizing the effect of the group on the individual: A self-attention perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 295-322.
95. Nemeth, C. J. (1975). Understanding minority influence: A reply and digression. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 265-267.
96. Nemeth, C. J. (1976). A comparison between conformity and minority influence. Paper presented to the International Congress of Psychology, France, Paris. Quoted in C. Nemeth (1995). Dissent as driving cognition, attitudes, and judgments. Social Cognition, 13, 273-291.
97. Nemeth, C. J. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93, 23-32.
98. Nemeth, C. J. (1995). Dissent as driving cognition, attitudes, and judgments. Social Cognition, 13, 273-291.
99. Nemeth, C. J., & Kwan, J. (1985). Originality of word associations as a function of majority and minority influence. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 277-282.
100. Nemeth, C. J., & Kwan, J. (1987). Minority influence, divergent thinking, and detection of correct solutions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 788-799.
101. Nemeth, C., Mosier, K., & Chiles, C. (1992). When convergent thought improves performance: Majority vs. minority influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 139-144.
102. Nemeth, C., Mayseless, O., Sherman, J., & Brown, Y. (1990). Exposure to dissent and recall of information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 429-437.
103. Nemeth, C. J., & Staw, B. M. (1989). The tradeoffs of social control and innovation in groups and organizations. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 22, pp. 175-209). New York: Academic Press.
104. Nemeth, C. J., & Wachtler, J. (1983). Creative problem solving as a result of majority versus minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 45-55.
105. Pascaline, B., Choulot, S., & Gaffie, B. (1998). Etude experimentale de la transformation de deux représentations en reseau. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 37, 97-121.
106. Pérez, J. A., & Mugny, G. (1987). Paradoxical effects of categorization in minority influence: When being an outgroup is an advantage. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 157-169.
107. Pérez, J. A., & Mugny, G. (1996). The conflict elaboration theory of social influence. In E. H. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior: Small group processes and interpersonal relations (Vol. 2, pp. 191-210). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
108. Pérez, J. A., & Mugny, G. (1998). Categorization and social influence. In S. Worchel & J. M. Francisco (Eds.), Social identity: International perspectives (pp. 142-153). London: Sage.
109. Pérez, J. A., Mugny, G., Butera, F., Kaiser, C., & Roux, P. (1991). Integrazione tra influenza magioritaria e minoritaria: Conversione, consenso e uniformita. Ricerche di Psicologia, 4, 75-102.
110. Personnaz, B. (1981). Study in social influence using the spectrometer method: Dynamics of the phenomena of conversion and covertness in perceptual responses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 431-438.
111. Personnaz, M., & Personnaz, B. (1994). Perception and conversion. In S. Moscovici, A. Mucchi- Faina, & A. Maass (Eds.), Minority influence (pp. 165-183). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
112. Peterson, R., & Nemeth, C. (1996). Focus versus flexibility: Majority and minority influence can both improve performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 14-23.
113. Petrillo, G. (1994). Collective movements and minority influence: The processes of social influence beyond the confines of experimental groups. In S. Moscovici, A. Mucchi-Faina, & A. Maass (Eds.), Minority influence (pp. 209-230). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
114. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
115. Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The "false consensus effect": An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279-301.
116. Sanchez-Mazas, M., Pérez, J. A., Navarro, E., Mugny, G., & Jovanovic, J. (1993). De la paralysie intragroupe au conflit normatif: études sur l'avortement, la contraception et la xénophobie. In J. A. Pérez & G. Mugny (Eds.), Influences sociales: La théorie de l'élaboration du conflit (pp. 121-143). Neuchâtel, Switzerland: Delachaux & Niestlé.
117. Schachter, S. (1951). Deviation, rejection, and communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,46, 190-207.
118. Schuurman, M. K., Siero, F. W., de Dreu, C. K. W., & Buunk, A. P. (1995). Differentiële verwerking van numerieke steun. In N. K. de Vries, N. E. Ellemers, R. Vonk, & C. K. W. de Dreu (Eds.), Fundamentele Sociale Psychologie (Vol. 9, pp. 1-9). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
119. Smith, C. M., Tindale, R. S., & Dugoni, B. L. (1996). Minority and majority influence in freely interacting groups: Qualitative versus quantitative differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 137-149.
120. Sorrentino, R. M., King, G., & Leo, G. (1980). The influence of the minority on perception: A note on a possible alternative explanation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 293-301.
121. Tanford, S., & Penrod, S. (1984). Social influence model: A formal integration of research on majority and minority influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 189-225.
122. Tesser, A., Campbell, J., & Mickler, S. (1983). The role of social pressure, attention to the stimulus, and self-doubt in conformity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 217-233.
123. Trost, M. R., Maass, A., & Kenrick, D. T. (1992). Minority influence: Personal relevance biases cognitive processes and reverses private acceptance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 234-254.
124. Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
125. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
126. Van Dyne, L., & Saavedra, R. (1996). A naturalistic minority influence experiment: Effects of divergent thinking, conflict and originality in work-groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 151-167.
127. Volpato, C., Maass, A., Mucchi-Faina, A., & Vitti, E. (1990). Minority influence and social categorization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 119-132.
128. Wilder, D. A. (1977). Perceptions of groups, size of opposition, and influence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 253-268.
129. Wolf, S. (1979). Behavioural style and group cohesiveness as sources of minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 381-395.
130. Wolf, S. (1985). Manifest and latent influence of majorities and minorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 899-908.
131. Wolf, S., & Latané, B. (1983). Majority and minority influence on restaurant preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 282-292.
132. Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J. A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 323-345.
133. Wood, W., Pool, G. J., Leck, K., & Purvis, D. (1996). Self-definition, defensive processing, and influence: The normative impact ofmajority and minority groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1181-1193.