Exploring the Latent Structure of Strength-related Attitude Attributes

Advances in Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 38, Issue , 2006, Pages 1-67

  Visser, Penny S ^a   Bizer, George Y ^a   Krosnick, Jon A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646165486     PISSN: 00652601     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38001-X     Document Type: Review

References (160)

1. Abelson R.P. Conviction. American Psychologist 43 (1988) 267-275
2. Abelson R.P. Attitude extremity. In: Petty R.E., and Krosnick J.A. (Eds). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 25-41
3. Allport G.W. Attitudes. In: Murchinson C.A. (Ed). A handbook of social psychology Vol. 2 (1935), Clark University Press, Worcester, MA 798-844
4. Alwin D.F., and Krosnick J.A. The measurement of values in surveys: A comparison of ratings and rankings. Public Opinion Quarterly 49 (1985) 535-552
5. Andrews F.M. Construct validity and error components of survey measures: A structural modeling approach. Public Opinion Quarterly 48 (1984) 409-442
6. Apsler R., and Sears D.O. Warning, personal involvement, and attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9 (1968) 162-166
7. Bass A.R., and Rosen H. Some potential moderator variables in attitude research. Educational and Psychological Measurement 29 (1969) 331-348
8. Bassili J.N. Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 (1996) 637-653
9. Bassili J.N. The how and why of response latency measurement in telephone surveys. In: Schwarz N., and Sudman S. (Eds). Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research (1996), Jossey-Bass Inc. Publishers, San Francisco, CA 319-346
10. Bassili J.N., and Krosnick J.A. Does attitude strength moderate susceptibility to response effects? New evidence using response latency, attitude extremity, aggregate indices, and continuous measures. Political Psychology 21 (2000) 107-132
11. Bassili J.N., and Roy J.P. On the representation of strong and weak attitudes about policy in memory. Political Psychology 19 (1998) 669-681
12. Bem D.J. Self-perception theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 6 (1972) 150-157
13. Bentler P.M. Semantic space is (approximately) bipolar. Journal of Psychology 71 (1969) 33-40
14. Berent M.K. Attitude importance and the recall of attitude-relevant information (1990), Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio Unpublished Master's Thesis
15. Berent M.K., and Krosnick J.A. Attitude importance and selective exposure to attitude-relevant information (1993), Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio Unpublished Manuscript
16. Berger I.E. The nature of attitude accessibility and attitude confidence: A triangulated experiment. Journal of Consumer Psychology 1 (1992) 103-123
17. Berger I.E., and Mitchell A.A. The effect of advertising on attitude accessibility, attitude confidence, and the attitude-behavior relationship. Journal of Consumer Research 16 3 (1989) 269-279
18. Biek M., Wood W., and Chaiken S. Working knowledge, cognitive processing, and attitudes: On the determinants of bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22 (1996) 547-556
19. Bishop G.F. Issue involvement and response effects in public opinion surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly 54 (1990) 209-218
20. Bizer G.Y., and Krosnick J.A. Exploring the structure of strength-related attitude features: The relation between attitude importance and attitude accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (2001) 566-586
21. Boninger D.S., Krosnick J.A., and Berent M.K. Origins of attitude importance: Self-interest, social identification, and value relevance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68 (1995) 61-80
22. Boninger D.S., Krosnick J.A., Berent M.K., and Fabrigar L.R. The causes and consequences of attitude importance. In: Petty R.E., and Krosnick J.A. (Eds). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 159-190
23. Borgida E., and Howard-Pitney B. Personal involvement and the robustness of perceptual salience effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 (1983) 560-570
24. Brady H.E. Statistical consistency and hypothesis testing for nonmetric multidimensional scaling. Psychometrika 50 (1985) 509-537
25. Brim O.G. Attitude content-intensity and probability expectations. American Sociological Review 20 (1955) 68-76
26. Brown D.W. Adolescent attitudes and lawful behavior. Public Opinion Quarterly 38 (1974) 98-106
27. Budd R.J. Predicting cigarette use: The need to incorporate measures of salience in the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 16 (1986) 633-685
28. Byrne D.E., London O., and Griffitt W. The effect of topic importance and attitude similarity-dissimilarity on attraction in an intrastranger design. Psychonomic Science 11 (1968) 303-304
29. Campbell D.T., and Fiske D.W. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin 56 (1959) 81-105
30. Cantril H. Gauging public opinion (1944), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
31. Cantril H. The intensity of attitude. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 41 (1946) 1-12
32. Celsi R.L., and Olson J.C. The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes. Journal of Consumer Research 15 (1988) 210-224
33. Chaiken S., Pomerantz E.M., and Giner-Sorolla R. Structural consistency and attitude strength. In: Petty R.E., and Krosnick J.A. (Eds). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 387-412
34. Clore G.L., and Baldridge B. Interpersonal attraction: The role of agreement and topic interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9 (1968) 340-346
35. Converse P.E. Comment: The status of nonattitudes. American Political Science Review 68 (1974) 650-660
36. Cooke N.J., Atlas R.S., Lane D.M., and Berger R.C. Role of high-level knowledge in memory for chess positions. American Journal of Psychology 106 (1993) 321-351
37. Costner H.L. Theory, deduction, and rules of correspondence. American Journal of Sociology 75 (1969) 245-263
38. Davidson A.R. From attitudes to actions to attitude change: The effects of amount and accuracy of information. In: Petty R.E., and Krosnick J.A. (Eds). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 315-336
39. Dawson E., Gilovich T., and Regan D.T. Motivated reasoning and performance on the Wason selection task. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28 (2002) 1379-1387
40. DiClemente R., Forrest K., Mickler S., and Principal Site Investigators. College students' knowledge and attitudes about AIDS. AIDS Education and Prevention 2 (1990) 201-212
41. Eagly A.H., and Chaiken S. Attitude structure and function. In: Gilbert D.T., Fiske S.T., and Lindzey G. (Eds). The handbook of social psychology (1998), McGraw Hill, New York 269-322
42. Eagly A.H., Kulesa P., Brannon L.A., Shaw K., and Hutson-Comeaux S. Why counterattitudinal messages are as memorable as proattitudinal messages: The importance of active defense against attack. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26 (2000) 1392-1408
43. Eckhardt B.B., Wood M.R., and Jacobvitz R.S. Verbal ability and prior knowledge: Contributions to adults' comprehension of television. Communication Research 18 (1991) 636-649
44. Edwards K., and Smith E.E. A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 1 (1996) 5-24
45. Engle R.W., Nations J.K., and Cantor J. Is "working memory capacity" just another name for word knowledge?. Journal of Educational Psychology 82 (1990) 799-804
46. Erber M.W., Hodges S.D., and Wilson T.D. Attitude strength, attitude stability, and the effects of analyzing reasons. In: Petty R.E., and Krosnick J.A. (Eds). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 433-454
47. Fazio R.H. A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. In: Hendrick C., and Clark M.S. (Eds). Research methods in personality and social psychology Vol. 11 (1990), Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA 74-97
48. Fazio R.H. Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In: Petty R.E., and Krosnick J.A. (Eds). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 247-282
49. Fazio R.H., and Towles-Schwen T. The MODE model of attitude-behavior processes. In: Chaiken S., and Trope Y. (Eds). Dual process theories in social psychology (1999), Guilford, New York 97-116
50. Fazio R.H., and Zanna M.P. Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 14 (1981) 161-202
51. Fazio R.H., Chen J., McDonel E.C., and Sherman S.J. Attitude accessibility, attitude-behavior consistency, and the strength of the object-evaluation association. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 18 (1982) 339-357
52. Fine B.J. Conclusion-drawing, communicator credibility, and anxiety as factors in opinion change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 5 (1957) 369-374
53. Fisher J.D., and Fisher W.A. Changing AIDS risk behavior. Psychological Bulletin 111 (1992) 455-474
54. Fiske S.T., Lau R.R., and Smith R.A. On the varieties and utilities of political expertise. Social Cognition 8 (1990) 31-48
55. Gorn G.J. The effects of personal involvement, communication discrepancy, and source prestige on reactions to communications on separatism. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science 7 (1975) 369-386
56. Granberg D., and Holmberg S. Political perception among voters in Sweden and the US: Analyses of issues with specific alternatives. Western Political Quarterly 39 (1986) 7-28
57. Green D.P. On the dimensionality of public sentiment toward partisan and ideological groups. American Journal of Political Science 32 (1988) 758-780
58. Green D.P., and Citrin J. Measurement error and the structure of attitudes: Are positive and negative judgments opposites?. American Journal of Political Science 64 (1994) 256-281
59. Green D.P., Goldman S.L., and Salovey P. Measurement error masks bipolarity in affect ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64 (1993) 1029-1041
60. Gross S.R., Holtz R., and Miller N. Attitude certainty. In: Petty R.E., and Krosnick J.A. (Eds). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 215-246
61. Guttman L., and Schuman E.A. Intensity and a zero point for attitude analysis. American Sociological Review 12 (1947) 57-67
62. Haddock G., Rothman A.J., Reber R., and Schwarz N. Forming judgments of attitude certainty, intensity, and importance: The role of subjective experiences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25 (1999) 771-782
63. Haddock G., Rothman A.J., and Schwarz N. Are (some) reports of attitude strength context dependent?. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 28 (1996) 313-316
64. Hansen J. The role of prior knowledge in content area learning. Learning and Learning Disabilities 3 (1984) 66-72
65. Helweg-Larsen M., and Collins B.E. A social psychological perspective on the role of knowledge about AIDS in AIDS prevention. Current Directions in Psychological Science 6 (1997) 23-26
66. Hippler H.J., and Schwarz N. Not forbidding isn't allowing: The cognitive basis of the forbid-allow assymmetry. Public Opinion Quarterly 50 (1986) 87-96
67. Hodson G., Maio G.R., and Esses V.M. The role of attitudinal ambivalence in susceptibility to consensus information. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 23 (2001) 197-205
68. Hoelter J.W. The structure of self-conception: Conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49 (1985) 1392-1407
69. Holbrook A.L. Operative and meta-psychological strength-related attitude features: A study of knowledge volume, ambivalence, and accessibility (2003), Ohio State University Unpublished doctoral dissertation
70. Holland R.W., Verplanken B., and van Knippenberg A. On the nature of attitude-behavior relations: The strong guide, the weak follow. European Journal of Social Psychology 32 (2002) 869-876
71. Howard-Pitney B., Borgida E., and Omoto A.M. Personal involvement: An examination of processing differences. Social Cognition 4 (1986) 39-57
72. Hyman H.H., and Sheatsley P.B. The current status of American public opinion. In: Payne J.C. (Ed). The teaching of contemporary affairs: Twenty-first yearbook of the national council of social studies (1950), National Council for the Social Studies, Washington, DC 11-34
73. Jackman M.R. Prejudice, tolerance, and attitudes toward ethnic groups. Social Science Research 6 (1977) 145-169
74. Jackson T.H., and Marcus G.E. Political competence and ideological constraint. Social Science Research 4 (1975) 93-111
75. Jarvis W.B.G., and Petty R.E. The need to evaluate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 (1996) 172-194
76. Johnson B.T., and Eagly A.H. Effects on involvement on persuasion: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 106 (1989) 290-314
77. Judd C.M., and Johnson J.T. Attitudes, polarization, and diagnosticity: Exploring the effect of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41 (1981) 26-36
78. Judd C.M., and Krosnick J.A. The structural bases of consistency among political attitudes: Effects of political expertise and attitude importance. In: Pratkanis A.R., Breckler S.J., and Greenwald A.T. (Eds). Attitude structure and function (1989), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ 99-128
79. Katz D. The measurement of intensity. In: Cantril H. (Ed). Gauging public opinion (1944), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ 51-65
80. Kenny D.A. Correlation and causality (1979), Wiley, New York
81. Kokkinaki F. Attitudes toward European Monetary Union in Greece: Antecedents, strength and consequences. Journal of Economic Psychology 19 (1998) 775-796
82. Krosnick J.A. The role of attitude importance in social evaluations: A study of policy preferences, presidential candidate evaluations, and voting behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55 (1988) 196-210
83. Krosnick J.A. Attitude importance and attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 24 (1988) 240-255
84. Krosnick J.A. Attitude importance and attitude accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 15 (1989) 297-308
85. Krosnick J.A. Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Applied Cognitive Psychology 5 (1991) 213-236
86. Krosnick J.A., and Abelson R.P. The case for measuring attitude strength in surveys. In: Tanur J. (Ed). Questions about survey questions (1992), Russell Sage, New York 177-203
87. Krosnick J.A., and Petty R.E. Attitude strength: An overview. In: Petty R.E., and Krosnick J.A. (Eds). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 1-24
88. Krosnick J.A., and Schuman H. Attitude intensity, importance, and certainty and susceptibility to response effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 (1988) 940-952
89. Krosnick J.A., and Telhami S. Public attitudes toward Israel: A study of the attentive and issue publics. International Studies Quarterly 39 (1995) 535-554
90. Krosnick J.A., Boninger D.S., Chuang Y.C., Berent M.K., and Carnot C.G. Attitude strength: One construct or many related constructs?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66 (1993) 1132-1151
91. Krosnick J.A., Jarvis B., Strathman A., and Petty R.E. Relations among dimensions of attitude strength: Insights from induced variable models (1994), Ohio State University, Columbus Unpublished Manuscript
92. Kyllonen P.C., Tirre W.C., and Christal R.E. Knowledge and processing speed as determinants of associative learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 120 (1991) 57-79
93. Lampron S.F., Krosnick J.A., Shaeffer E., Petty R.E., and See M. Different types of involvement moderate persuasion (somewhat) differently: Contrasting outcome-based and value-based involvement. Paper presented at the Society for Personality and Social Psychology Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, California (2003)
94. Lastovicka J.L., and Gardner D.M. Components of involvement. In: Maloney J.C., and Silverman B. (Eds). Attitude research plays for high stakes (1979), American Marketing Association, Chicago 53-73
95. Lavine H., Huff J.W., Wagner S.H., and Sweeney D. The moderating influence of attitude strength on the susceptibility to context effects in attitude surveys. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75 (1998) 359-373
96. Lemon N.F. A model of the extremity, confidence and salience of an opinion. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 7 (1968) 106-114
97. Lord C.G., Ross L., and Lepper M.R. Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 (1979) 2098-2109
98. Mann J.M., Tarantola D.J., and Netter T.W. AIDS in the world: A global report (1992), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
99. Marks L.J., and Kamins M.A. The use of product sampling and advertising: Effects of sequence of exposure and degree of advertising claim exaggeration on consumers' belief strength, belief confidence, and attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research 25 (1988) 266-281
100. McDill E.L. A comparison of three measures of attitude intensity. Social Forces 38 (1959) 95-99
101. McGraw K.M., Lodge M., and Stroh P.K. On-line processing in candidate evaluation: The effects of issue order, issue salience, and sophistication. Political Behavior 12 (1990) 41-58
102. McGraw K.M., and Pinney N. The effects of general and domain-specific expertise on political memory and judgment. Social Cognition 8 (1990) 9-30
103. McGuire W.J. The myth of massive media impact: Savagings and salvagings. In: Comstock G. (Ed). Public communication and behavior Vol. 1 (1986), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 173-257
104. Miller A.G., McHoskey J.W., Bane C.M., and Dowd T.G. The attitude polarization phenomenon: Role of response measure, attitude extremity, and behavioral consequences of reported attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64 (1993) 561-574
105. Miller N.E. Involvement and dogmatism as inhibitors of attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1 (1965) 121-132
106. Mokdad A.H., Marks J.S., Stroup D.F., and Gerberding J.L. Actual causes of death in the U.S., 2000. Journal of the American Medical Association 291 (2004) 1238-1245
107. Newby-Clark I.R., McGregor I., and Zanna M.P. Thinking and caring about cognitive inconsistency: When and for whom does attitudinal ambivalence feel uncomfortable?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82 (2002) 157-166
108. Parker H.A., Perry R.W., and Gillespie D.F. Prolegomenon to a theory of attitude-behavior relationships. Pakistan Journal of Psychology 7 (1974) 21-39
109. Paull G., and Glencross D. Expert perception and decision making in baseball. International Journal of Sport Psychology 28 (1997) 35-56
110. Payne S.L. The art of asking questions (1951), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
111. Pearson P.D., Hansen J., and Gordon C. The effect of background knowledge on young children's comprehension of explicit and implicit information. Journal of Reading Behavior 11 (1979) 201-209
112. Pelham B.W. On confidence and consequence: The certainty and importance of self-knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60 (1991) 518-530
113. Petty R.E., and Cacioppo J.T. Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 (1979) 1915-1926
114. Petty R.E., and Cacioppo J.T. Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change (1986), Springer-Verlag, New York
115. Petty R.E., and Cacioppo J.T. Involvement and persuasion: Tradition versus integration. Psychological Bulletin 107 (1990) 367-374
116. Petty R.E., Haugtvedt C.P., and Smith S.M. Elaboration as a determinant of attitude strength: Creating attitudes that are persistent, resistant, and predictive of behavior. In: Petty R.E., and Krosnick J.A. (Eds). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 93-130
117. Petty R.E., and Krosnick J.A. Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
118. Pomerantz E.M., Chaiken S., and Tordesillas R.S. Attitude strength and resistance processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69 (1995) 408-419
119. Powell J.L. Satirical persuasion and topic salience. Southern Speech Communication Journal 42 (1977) 151-162
120. Priester J.R., and Petty R.E. The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: Relating positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 3 (1996) 431-449
121. Prislin R. Attitude stability and attitude strength: One is enough to make it stable. European Journal of Social Psychology 26 (1996) 447-477
122. Raden D. Strength-related attitude dimensions. Social Psychology Quarterly 48 (1985) 312-330
123. Roberts D.F., and Maccoby N. Effects of mass communication. In: Lindzey G., and Aronson E. (Eds). Handbook of social psychology. 3rd. Vol. 2 (1985), Random House, New York 539-598
124. Roese N.J., and Olson J.M. Attitude importance as a function of repeated attitude expression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 30 (1994) 39-51
125. Rogers T.E., Singer E., and Imperio J. The polls: AIDS-an update. Public Opinion Quarterly 57 (1993) 92-114
126. Rokeach M., and Kliejunas P. Behavior as a function of attitude-toward-object and attitude-toward-situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 22 (1972) 194-201
127. Schneider W., Gruber H., Gold A., and Opwis K. Chess expertise and memory for chess positions in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 56 (1993) 328-349
128. Schuman H., and Presser S. Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording, and context (1981), Academic Press, New York
129. Schwarz N. Accessible content and accessibility experiences: The interplay of declarative and experiential information in judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2 (1998) 87-99
130. Schwarz N., Bless H., Strack F., Klumpp G., Rittenauer-Schatka H., and Simons A. Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61 (1991) 195-202
131. Stember H., and Hyman H. How interviewer effects operate through question form. International Journal of Opinion and Attitude Research 3 (1949-1950) 493-512
132. Stouffer S.A., Guttman L., Suchman E.A., Lazarsfeld P.F., Star S.A., and Clausen J.A. Measurement and prediction (1950), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
133. Suchman E.A. The intensity component in attitude and opinion research. In: Stouffer S.A., Guttman L., Suchman E.A., Lazarsfeld P.F., Star S.A., and Clausen J.A. (Eds). Measurement and prediction (1950), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ 213-276
134. Swann Jr. W.B., and Ely R.J. A battle of wills: Self-verification versus behavioral confirmation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46 (1984) 1287-1302
135. Swann Jr. W.B., Pelham B.W., and Chidester T.R. Change through paradox: Using self-verification to alter beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 (1988) 268-273
136. Tannenbaum P.H. Initial attitude toward source and concept as factors in attitude change through communication. Public Opinion Quarterly 20 (1956) 413-425
137. Tedin K.L. Assessing peer and parental influence on adolescent political attitudes. American Journal of Political Science 24 (1980) 136-154
138. Theodorakis Y. Planned behavior, attitude strength, role identity, and the prediction of exercise behavior. The Sports Psychologist 8 (1994) 149-165
139. Thompson M.T., and Zanna M.P. The conflicted individual: Personality-based and domain-specific antecedents of ambivalent social attitudes. Journal of Personality 63 (1995) 259-288
140. Thompson M.T., Zanna M.P., and Griffin D.W. Let's not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In: Petty R.E., and Krosnick J.A. (Eds). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 361-386
141. Tourangeau R., and Rasinski K.A. Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychological Bulletin 103 (1988) 299-314
142. Tourangeau R., Rasinski K.A., Bradburn N., and D'Andrade R. Carryover effects in attitude surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly 53 (1989) 495-524
143. Tversky A., and Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185 (1974) 1124-1131
144. Vallone R.P., Ross L., and Lepper M.R. The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverate of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49 (1985) 577-585
145. Verplanken B. Involvement and need for cognition as moderators of beliefs-attitude-intention consistency. British Journal of Social Psychology 28 (1989) 115-122
146. Verplanken B. Persuasive communication of risk information: A test of cue versus message processing effects in a field experiment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17 (1991) 188-193
147. Visser P.S. Assessing the structure and function of attitude strength: Insights from a new approach (1998), Ohio State University Unpublished doctoral dissertation
148. Visser. P.S., Krosnick J.A., and Norris C.M. Challenging the common-factor model of strength-related attitude attributes: Contrasting the antecedents and consequences of attitude importance and attitude-relevant knowledge (2004), University of Chicago, Chicago, IL Unpublished manuscript
149. Visser P.S., Krosnick J.A., and Simmons J.P. Distinguishing the cognitive and behavioral consequences of attitude importance and certainty: A new approach to testing the common-factor hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 39 (2003) 118-141
150. Wänke M., Bless H., and Biller B. Subjective experience versus content of information in the construction of attitude judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22 (1996) 1105-1113
151. Wason P.C. Reasoning. In: Foss B.M. (Ed). New horizons in psychology (1966), Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middlesex, UK 135-151
152. Wason P.C. Reasoning about a rule. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 20 (1968) 273-281
153. Wason P.C., and Johnson-Laird P.N. Psychology of reasoning: Structure and content (1972), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
154. Willoughby T., Waller T.G., Wood E., and MacKinnon G.E. The effect of prior knowledge on an immediate and delayed associative learning task following elaborative interrogation. Contemporary Educational Psychology 18 (1993) 36-46
155. Wilson T.D., Dunn D.S., Kraft D., and Lisle D.J. Introspection, attitude change, and attitude-behavior consistency: The disruptive effects of explaining why we feel the way we do. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 22 (1989) 287-343
156. Wood W. Retrieval of attitude-relevant information from memory: Effects on susceptibility to persuasion and on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42 (1982) 798-810
157. Wood W., and Kallgren C.A. Communicator attributes and persuasion: Recipients' access to attitude-relevant information in memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 4 (1988) 172-182
158. Wood W., Rhodes N., and Biek M. Working knowledge and attitude strength: An information-processing analysis. In: Petty R.E., and Krosnick J.A. (Eds). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 283-313
159. Zaichkowsky J.L. Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research 12 (1985) 341-352
160. Zuwerink J.R., and Devine P.G. Attitude importance and resistance to persuasion: It's not just the thought that counts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 (1996) 931-944